[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 589 KB, 854x480, tabbys star.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11938705 No.11938705 [Reply] [Original]

is tabby's star proof aliens are real?

>> No.11938712

>>11938705
probably not

>> No.11938721

Hopefully not

>> No.11938724 [DELETED] 

>>11938705
definitely not

>> No.11938735

>>11938705
No. To think "aliens" because of that star reveals that the individual has no clue how stars work or what he's observing.

> Stars playlist:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwOAYhBuU3UdIacwIr5Scrrf5KCfvRTDC

> A Blue Supergiant Star Mysteriously Disappeared, Baffling Astronomers!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HNqAu-APqU

> The North Star is behaving in a way Scientist CANNOT explain!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=irqe5tQ3POQ

> Mysterious Flashing Star points to a PLASMA lensing effect
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbkzV99Fjgc

Stars flashing, increasing and decreasing in brightness/energy, and even disappearing from view completely, are all phenomena completely expected in the Electric model of the universe. Only within the standard mainstream model of the universe are these phenomena surprsing, mysterious and require special theories and convoluted explanations.

>> No.11938739

>>11938705
Proof? No, so far it isn't proof of anything other than dimming. Could it be an alien megastructure? Maybe but given the weirdness of the universe, a natural explanation seems more likely.

>> No.11938761
File: 168 KB, 1100x2516, Birkeland currents.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11938761

>>11938705
>>11938739
>the dyson sphere meme
No and no and yet again no. There are no dyson spheres out there, and neither will one ever be constructed. Even if it was possible to build, a dyson sphere would be an absolutely pointless construction because stars /are stars/ due to the Birkeland currents flowing to them and powering them (they are not internally powered). Building a shell around a star, enclosing the star within the shell and sealing it off, would cut off the stars power supply and cause the star to cease to exist. It wouldn't shine any longer - /it would no longer be a star/. Hence the entire dyson sphere would be utterly pointless.

You would be much better off trying to build some huge (star size or even larger) structure which can harness energy directly from the cosmic Birkeland currents.

Pic related: https://www.plasma-universe.com/birkeland-current/
Archived: https://archive.is/QYakP

>> No.11938774

>>11938761
Almost everyone who talks of a Dyson Sphere really means a Dyson Swarm, which is also what Dyson had in mind. Only IFLS and Star Trek takes it to be a literal solid sphere.

>> No.11938815

>>11938735

I'm prettt sure Flat-earthers defend the eletric theory.

>>11938705
Could be, yes, or just another phenomena.

>> No.11938817

>>11938761

Dyson sphere doesn't enclose all of the star.

Sorry to break your unbased rant.

>> No.11938833

It's dust.

>> No.11938847

>>11938833
the literal only star out of the billions in the milky way where we have seen this hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

>> No.11938861

>>11938847
Show me a source that supports this statement please

>> No.11938865

>>11938861
you double nigger prove it is dust

>> No.11938882

>>11938865
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/mysterious-dimming-of-tabbys-star-may-be-caused-by-dust
Theres a couple of papers that go into more detail on the findings if you're not too lazy to go look at them.

>> No.11938955

>>11938735
It's just dark matter sitting on front of it.

>> No.11939407

>>11938955
no it's just yo mama standing there XD