/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11933628
30

>>11933628

Is one shoe half the value of 2 shoes?

yes i asume>>11933633

>>11933633
No. In a real life scenario one shoe would be worth less than half the value of the pair, since you need both shoes to be able to actually use them

19

>>11933628
6A = 30
2A + 2B + 2C = 20
B + 5C = 13
A + BC = X
A = 5
2B + 2C = 10
B = 13 - 5C
2(13-5C) + 2C = 10
C = 2
14 + 2B = 20
B = 3
X = 11

>>11933658
Assuming the dude isn’t wearing the shoes

>>11933628
>takes away 1 whistle from the pair of whistles
>takes away one shoe from the pair of shoes
>takes the whistle from the chink
5+3*2 = 11

>>11933665
no, but compare this analysis to /pol/

>>11933671
The answer is 11 dummy

>>11933628
Different variables in last line so it is undetermined, as all of these always are

>>11933628
Oh look, it's an order of operations thread
Oh look the boy in the 3rd one isn't wearing a whistle around his neck.
Oh look OP is a massive faggot

>>11933628
Line 1. Two shoes = 10
(Assume one shoe equals 5)
Line 2. Man = 5
Line 3. Whistle equals 4

4. Observe: One shoe. Last operation is times, not adding. PEMDAS = multiply first.

5 + (5+4) = 25

>>11933683
>Oh look, it's an order of operations thread
Pretty sure no one disagrees that
a+b*c = a+(b*c)

>>11933665
>Assuming the dude isn’t wearing the shoes

It is irrelevant, because the shoes would be there for every instance of him, and thus is equal to 5 either way.

>>11933691
Those are pairs of whistles that are differently colored in line 3

>>11933628
12

>>11933714
Oh wait, thought it was a + on the last line.

Answer is 15

>>11933628
20

>>11933691
>Line 1. Two shoes = 10
>(Assume one shoe equals 5)
>Line 2. Man = 5
>Line 3. Whistle equals 4
>4. Observe: One shoe. Last operation is times, not adding. PEMDAS = multiply first.
>5 + (5x4) = 25

> Edit: Guy in last frame is not wearing a whistle. That's BS, since everything else was visible from the thumbnail.

Line 1. Two shoes = 10
(Assume one shoe equals 5)
Line 2. (Man+Whistle) = 5
Line 3. Whistle = 4
(Therefore man without whistle = 1)
4. Observe: One shoe. Man not wearing whistle. Last operation is times, not adding. PEMDAS = multiply first.

>5 + (1x4) = 9

>>11933723
Double whistle = 4. Single whistle = 2, which means man without whistle = 3.

5 + 3 * 2 = 11.

This problem is fucking retarded

>>11933723
In line 3 there are 5 whistles though

>>11933723
>>11933704

>>11933628
25
/sci/ is full of literal retards

>>11933742
Brain let detected.

The pictures on the last line are all different than the pictures above them

>>11933628
>>11933704
5.854101966
or
-0.8541019662

>>11933733
its made for facebook moms

>>11933628
26

>>11933628
In last image kid is missing whistle on his shirt.

Kid = 3+ single whistle(2)

In last image kid = 3

Therefore following PEMDAS we have 3*2 = 5
5+5
Answer = 10

>>11933628
11

>>11933794
>3*2=5
Anon

how is /sci/ so fucking retarded?

>>11933628
15

TFW the value of that guy is less than the value of a single shoe

>>11933807
well he is asian so...

>>11933798
Dammit shit

I change my answer to 11

>>11933807
Well, I mean look at him

>>11933810
He doesn’t look Asian. He looks douchy

>>11933807
>>11933810
Is he also wearing those shoes? If so then how value is actually -7

>>11933807
maybe he's chinese

>>11933821
On line #4 he isn’t wearing shoes since the soccer game is over (as evidenced by the whistle being gone)

>>11933821
no way to tell, disregard any information that you can't possibly collect

>>11933628
4 unknowns so the problem is underconstrained
NEXT PLEASE

>>11933831
the only way to tell is if you ask the artist

>>11933830
Shit. How many points were shin guards and athletic cup?

>>11933838
and what about his pants? or his underwear? socks?

>>11933836
make that 5

x = (30/3)
y = (20 - x)/2
z = (13 - y)/2

(x/2)+y(z/2) == (10/2)+5(4/2) = 20

what is wrong with this?

>>11933910
Because the variables are actually 2x, y + z, and 2z. Look at the image again

>>11933628
Look, it's one shoe and one whistle in the last part! Top ecks dee, people who don't get this are so DUMB!!

>>11933935
Assuming size, perspective, and color have no meaning as well as their vector multiplication sign is actually scalar multiplication

>>11933983
Still 25

>>11933671
The thread on /pol/ has the R in the last row removed.

11 tho.

>>11934188
Well the P is 2 so R is like P and then another almost 50%, so the R is worth 3 so without the R it would be just 5 since the guy then is worth 0

>>11933628
6x = 30
x = 5

2x + y + y = 20
2(5) + 2y = 20
2y = 10
y = 5

y + 2z + 2z = 13
5 + 4z = 13
4z = 8
z = 2

x + y * z = ?
5 + 5 * 2
5 + 10
15

What is this called? Its facebook tier. Theres always a twist like that "hidden" multiplication sign where people go "ahhhhhh gotcha!"

>>11934235
oh look another gotcha I didnt see, a whistle on his neck

>>11934235
>>11934238
11

>>11933628
Pair of shoes = 10, guy with whistle = 5, pair of whistles = 4.

Is the last line just meant to be an absolute statement?
Or are we meant to answer it as:
(10/2)+(5-(4/2))*(4/2) = 11?

Because pretty sure a pair of shoes will cost differently to two single, likely unpaired shoes[1], the guy's ability to blow can be judged regardless of the number of whistles around his neck[2], and whistles often come as a buy-one-get-one-free deal.
11/10, got me to reply.

[1] Although, judging by the pictographs on top, chances are there is only one shoe model, so probability of not pairing is reduced
[2] Evebn without any! Proof left as exercise.

>>11933628
25. Aka the number of times I made your mother squirt.

Let s = the value of a single shoe, m the value of the mexican dude, and w = the value of the whistle.

6s = 30, so s = 5.

2s+2m = 20. Therefore 2m = 10, so m = 5.

m+2w = 13, so 2w = 8. w = 4.

Order of operations is such that s + m * y = s + my = 5 + (5 * 4) = 25.

>>11933628
Variable "s" = single shoe
Variable "m" = chink
Variable "w" = single whistle
System of equations:
6s = 30
2s+2m=20
m+4w=13
Thus:
s+m+w=15

>>11933628
>3 equations, 3 variables
It is easy.

>>11933628
11

>>11933640

Thats what I thought too when I was a little bitch like 30 minutes ago. But not I am super old and wise.

>>11933628
30

>>11933632
Correct

>>11933628
[math] \displaystyle
\left [
\left .
\begin{matrix}
6 & 0 & 0 \\
2 & 2 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 4
\end{matrix}
\right |
\begin{matrix}
30 \\
20 \\
13
\end{matrix}
\right ]
\begin{matrix}
~ \div 6 \\
~ \div 2-\frac{I}{6} \\
~
\end{matrix} \\
\left [
\left .
\begin{matrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 4
\end{matrix}
\right |
\begin{matrix}
5 \\
5 \\
13
\end{matrix}
\right ]
\begin{matrix}
~ \\
~ \\
~ (III-II) \div 4
\end{matrix} \\
\left [
\left .
\begin{matrix}
1 & 0 & 0 \\
0 & 1 & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1
\end{matrix}
\right |
\begin{matrix}
5 \\
5 \\
2
\end{matrix}
\right ] \\
5+5 \cdot 2=15
[/math]

>2020
>people STILL posting variations of this meme
>HAHA R U GOOD AT MATH?
>it's never about math, it's about observation skills
>oh look the gook isn't wearing a whistle

always the same dumb tricks

19