/sci/ - Science & Math

>>>/x/ Is the board where you report your latest scientific discoveries, you'll find your equivalent IQs there

>>11918075
there's a difference between skepticism and rampant disregard for demonstrated results.
denying the moon landing is not "being skeptical," it's "being retarded"

>>11918075
A lot of science skeptics don't know shit about anything and are just repeating what their favorite conspiracy tuber said
Anyways if you can make a proper argument against something go for it, it's fun to argue

>>11918090
https://skepticalinquirer.org/volume/no-4-vol-44/

>>11918075
there is a difference between the question of whether dinosaurs having feathers something not easily testable and a guess based on random crap vs some retarded schizo theory that counters a well known well tested widely accepted thing. ie EU fags ie anti relativity fags ie any other retard from /x/.

>>11918095

>>11918098
is this satire? I can't even tell anymore

>Although science has never authenticated a single ghost, spirits of the dead have posed for elaborate studio portraits, strolled casually into mundane photographic scenes, and darted into the snapshots of hopeful ghost hunters—or so it seems. Initially, however, ghosts were reticent to appear before the camera.

>>11918101
Is that article even real? 90s and 2000s saw many "hottest years in recorded history"
Anyways global warming is still real, even if predictions about it were wrong

>>11918075

Op is right. I posted this derivation and the thread was deleted for being a troll post. My sin I suppose is not believing Bell.

>>11918075
>why is /sci/ so anti-septic?
because sepsis is bad

A page and a half of OP shitting his pants in rage
Which one of your sacred cows did we laugh at, OP?
>>/sci/?ghost=yes&search_filename=1568255780055

>>11918111
>predictions about it
Models from 1982 predicted 2019 accurately.
Big oil knew exactly what it was doing.
https://youtu.be/FGVW9vJ773k