/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11868872
of course we can use nanomachines but obviously it is more technologically feasible to use 5G mind control. why bother with nanobots when you can use fluoride and clampumccination to do the job more cheaply?

>nanomachines
no practical examples exist
>possible
no, stat mech and thermodynamics prohibit them from being useful or viable in any meaningful way. gene therapy and eugenics are the closest we come to dealing with many of the nastier diseases people seek to "cure"

>>11868876
Funny, but if the nanomachine concept is possible it would be used can it not?
>>11868877
Shame

>>11868872
it won't necessarily be that simple fag. Tiny machines ain't magical. So how you gonna do it fag?
>>11868877
>>stat mech and thermodynamics prohibit them
prove it faggot. No, brownian motion does not prohibit really tiny machines that can move around in your body

>>11868996
>Tiny machines ain't magical.
No shit, I'm suggesting IF nanomachines are to be developed. Is it possible to cure these people by influence and supression with the help of nanomachines.

>>11868872
>Can we use nanomachines to cure these people?
No because they'll never exist, retard.

>>11868872
niggermachines

>>11869013
Question is. If they can't exist, why the fuck is research still continuing

ANNOUNCEMENT: This is a shit thread. Why are you fags even replying? We need to create a cohesive board culture of just denying answers to OPs like this.

>inb4 OP calls me a fag
Look in the mirror, smoothbrain. What the fuck kind of thread is this? You're not looking for any sort of actual discussion, otherwise you'd actually be taking the points made by others into account... As opposed to making idiotic posts like >>11869091
>Question is. If they can't exist, why the fuck is research still continuing

sage goes in all fields.

>>11869118
I have a sneaking suspicion that marxists have invaded this board

>>11869122
and /pol/tards

>>11869118
Ok then faggot. If you can't disprove my statement then consider fucking off. I want anwsers but this board is filled with IQ obessed retards at this point

>>11869286
You just couldn’t help yourself, could you?

>>11869358
Yes, fuckers ruined the board along with lefty IQ fags

>>11869364
make sure to check under your bed tonight before going to sleep to make sure the poltard isn't hiding there.

>>11869403
will do

>>11869118
I must say fuck you, I am bumping OP's thread.

>>11870291
this isn’t nanotech, brainlet. and this isn’t at the scale where noise and heat start to rape nano into uselessness

>>11870317
it isn't? Those are molecules anon.

>>11868872
>nanomachines
Don't need that.
You could probably change them with some sort of intensive hypno indoctrination.
Associate pain/discomfort/disgust with exposure to gay shit/tranny thought and associate heterosexual arousal and healthy gender behavior reward with pleasure/comfort/positiveness.

After all it's already how fetish pornography works, initially it attracts one individual around a pre-existing fetish, the content is mixed with connected fetish (increasingly extreme in general) which emerge after as a result.

>>11870330
No it isn’t, brainlet nigger.

>>11868877
>no practical examples exist

>>11868872
Nanomachines aren't actually possible fggt

>>11870719
pic related motherfucker.

op and so many other posters in this thread are fucking brainlets holy shit. you're too stupid to realize why you look stupid in asking the specific questions you're asking

>>11870782
poorly optimized garbage

>>11872425
Implying the artificial shit will be any better when we hit the capability level of an animal cell. I bet they'll be running fucking JavaScript and Python in physical containers.

>>11870782
>>11871239
So fucking stupid, techfags will never make it

>>11872445
Your post is senseless.

>>11872462
No, you guys are just absolutely riddled with brain worms and don't understand how fake and gay nanotech and all of the other vaporware trash is. Its really depressing because I know its due to stunted emotional development and certain cognitive deficits that can't be fixed. Like talking to a schizophrenic or a severely suicidal maniac they aren't going to get better but they're not necessarily stupid or evil.

>>11872425
t.retard who never studied any molecular biology

>>11872482
You replied to my post, which literally just pointed out that life is fundamentally the same as nanotechnology, except it's evolved mechanisms instead of human designed.
Nanotech is going to be made by producing a class of programmable cells. This future isn't far off, compared to the range of human history. I think we'll get there this century. The first practical application will probably be during WWIII.

>>11872425
>>11872438
planes may not be as efficient as birds, but planes can go faster than birds and move more payload than birds.
>>Implying the artificial shit will be any better
there is the possibility the artificial shit could be better in some aspects, much in the same way a plane is faster than a bird. Biology relies on a number of chemicals bumping around pretty much randomly. Tiny machines made of chemicals that aren't bumping around as randomly might be better in some aspects than biology. When you look at things like motor proteins, they take a relatively long time to bounce around into the right configuration in order to move forward.
>>11872392
>>11872445
>>11872482
you keep saying that people are stupid without giving any reasons why. As for dealing with thermal motion, the amount something swings around due to thermal motion depends on the stiffness of the material used. So by using a stiff enough material and structure, thermal motion may be reduced to acceptable levels. Of course the bigger issue with very small machines is not whether they are possible, but how to practically make them. Making very complicated structures that are better than biology will be challenging to do with synthetic chemistry. If only because yields drop exponentially with each additional reaction. There is of course the proposed method of placing individual atoms and molecules to carry out controlled chemical reactions, but it is still a question as to whether that's possible at all.