[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 55 KB, 615x409, nukemarsagain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11837156 No.11837156 [Reply] [Original]

/sci/ I see some crackpot conspiracy theory that says Mars was obliterated by nuclear explosions in the past, and that there is real scientific evidence to support this.

There is evidence that Mars may have been habitable for life in the past, for sure...

So, what does /sci/ think, is there any credibility to the Mars got nuked theory?? Could it have wiped out the life there?

>> No.11837162

elevated Xenon 129 levels

>> No.11837167

>>11837156
100% true, I saw it with my own I's

>> No.11837189

>>11837162
Found this.
https://podcast.sjrdesign.net/shownotes_086.php

>> No.11837287
File: 118 KB, 636x392, best abstract ever.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11837287

>>11837156
>is there any credibility to the Mars got nuked theory??
no

>> No.11837302

>>11837162
That can be explained by the fact Xenon 129 is pretty much an array of numbers.

>> No.11837320

It's most likely that the elevated xenon-129 levels are from a number of natural nuclear reactions, although even this would have been an exceptionally rare event, either way it's cool.

>> No.11837376

>>11837156
no
now git gone
>>>/x/

>> No.11838568

>>11837156
The evidence is interesting. But there is also a conflicting theory that a giant fucking lightning bolt did it. Both have convincing evidence. I doubt both are correct though.

>> No.11838570

Why are you so concerned about this? We can barely take care of Earth...

>> No.11840201

>>11837156
"Convincing" evidence huh? What is that, exactly?

>> No.11840260

>>11838568
>EU shit
>Convincing evidence
lmao no

>> No.11840283

>>11840260
>Jewish Physics
>Convincing evidence
I bet you actually believe this without understanding any of it.

>> No.11840293

>>11838568
You are retarded aren’t you

>> No.11840298

https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=6631
Here what NASA says about it no nukes.

>> No.11840452

>>11840298
>Nasa
https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/25/21302786/nasa-names-headquarters-after-mary-jackson-the-agencys-first-black-female-engineer
what does /sci/ make of this? it's venerating a calculator because of diversity points?

>> No.11840458
File: 182 KB, 1877x273, mars.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840458

>>11837156
I have the screenshot from some anon posting it 2 days ago. Here it is anon.

>> No.11840798
File: 119 KB, 1200x675, pia20847-16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11840798

>>11840452
Dude, didn't you read that article? It completely explains there are 2.6 times more Xe 129 than on post-nuclear tests Earth. It's just a silly conspiracy theory, come on. Maybe it was due to two Iodine 129 asteroids colliding in Mars atmosphere or a naturally occurring flying nuclear reactor that operated via capture instead of moderation. This stuff happens pretty much everywhere, it's nothing.

>> No.11841704

>>11840798
What the fuck is an Iodine 129 asteroid?

>> No.11842235

>>11840798
>>11841704

https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/the-behaviour-of-iodine-and-xenon-in-the-first-asteroids(eea97d0b-6cc3-4c7d-a66b-facf6dce9c03).html