/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11817544
Only if your offspring does the same

There's no guarantee your line doesn't die out in the future.

What are you winning?

>>11817548
>>11817549

If every human is one of my kin in the future do I win?

>>11817544
Reproducing isn't the ultimate goal of life. What is important is subjective because we all have different desires. I just hope that the humankind will not disappear, I could adopt a child and love it as my own child

>>11817544
If you have high quality dna, the consciousness that will be forced by Ialdoboath to incarnate through those genes like breath through a flute by the will win. If someone with shitty genes decides to pass them on, a human who doesn’t exist yet is going to lose hard.

>>11817584
>I could adopt a child and love it as my own child
retard when were we talking about love?
fucking loser
>>11817544
yes but you need to ensure their success.
but that's surviving.
winning is curing death.
then we won't need to reproduce.

>>11817544
Only if you identify as your DNA and are willing to let your identity be diluted exponentially over time. You would essentially be participating in the ultimate cuck, with the winner being natural selection.
The only way to win is to change the game.

>>11817597
>has daughter
>gets vasectomy
>forces all future males to be my cucks
>reign as immortal patriarch dragon
WINRAR!

>>11817591
And?... Is it illegal to speak about love here? Do you just comment for no reason?

>>11817630
genetics. genes. dna. biological matter. physical world. etc.

Do you need me to explain the difference between that which is universally quantifiable vs recognizable?

>>11817544
You lose because you are reincarnated through your progeny so if one thing goes wrong, you will lead a miserable life in the future. If I indiscriminately inseminated as many women as I could, I would have a very high chance of being born to a single mother which would lead to a cycle of endless suffering. It could be even worse. Imagine impregnating a third world woman then having to manifest in the generations that follow. If you aren't prepared to rectify it when things go wrong (wayward child, divorce, etc), then you lose 100% by passing your Genes on. Your cognitive footprint manifests itself ever 15 or so generations later bt the way so you need to instruct your children of the same theory and to take the same extreme actions should things go awry.

>>11817544
It's like a relay race of infinite length. If you successfully do your part, it's not really your responsibility to win the rest of the race.

>>11817581
Mankind could go extinct so no
You can only game battles, not the war

>>11817882
If mankind doesn’t go extinct, do I win?

>>11817544
No. If you live forever, you win. If one of your descendants lives forever, you go even.

>>11818027
we all win baby.

>>11817544
>If I pass on my genes do I win?

YOU don't. Your genes do.

>>11817544
One man, no man. Even if you pass on your genes, if others like you don't then in the end you will lose when your offspring gets blacked or browned.

>>11818027
Depends on how you limit "mankind" in term of species so maybe-yes.

>>11817584
Lmao cuck

the whole concept of "passing on your genes" doesn't even make sense. in reality it's more like having diluted gene copies show up in the next generation.

and what's it even mean "my genes", as if you are over and above your biology, as a possessor of them.

also there is no winning or losing in natural selection, it has no goal or aim/teleos. those that survive and reproduce have their surviving and reproducing gene copies show in subsequent generations, those that don't, don't. whoopdy shit who gives a fuck

lifes fucking shit anyway why would you even curse another person to this gauntlet? we all fucking die in the end regardless whats the point?