/sci/ - Science & Math

Give me any two real numbers and I will always be able to give you a real number between them.

>>11770055
the natural numbers

>>11770076
I don't think it is a real thing.

>>11770055
>Has anyone ever observed something infinite?
Every application of calculus ever.

>>11770055

The Fibonacci Sequence / Spiral, which is an essential blueprint of and is presently visible throughout all of existence.

https://discord.gg/FFwRXKq

>>11770098
define real and infinite.
You can’t talk about a mathematical concept and exclude mathematics.

>>11770109
x-tier

>>11770055
I've observed 4chan, and 4chan is infinite, ergo I am infinite along with all other shitposters and lurkers.

>>11770109
hurr durr if I get out of my own way nothing but cool and awesome shit happens.

fascinating.

>>11770055
>Does infinity exist?
It is a limit, anon, not a number.
>Has anyone ever observed something infinite?
Leftist stupidity is nearly infinite.

>>11770173
Trite or sardonic opinions presented as a post-analytic product are infinite, retard.

>>11770173
>can't into hyperreals

>>11770055
if observation is finite, then surely it would take an infinite amount of time to observe an infinite quantity.

>>11770262
God of Time here, I am also known as the Dragon and literally everything else you could conceive the notion of time ultimately being beyond text and missive.

I am the only one spending infinity of timeon observing all that which is considered quantity or quantifiable.

How may I rub shit in your face so that you leave me and never return?

tl;dr, no. not anything is infinite.

Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.”

>>11770055
"An infinite set is a set that is not finite" I love Math

>>11770055
No, and no. Infinity is an abstract notion used to describe objects that appear to have no upper bound in terms of the value used to describe it. This can be for example a coordinate in space, where the precision of the coordinate may be increased without reaching some sort of "end" value. It may also be used to describe things such as the theoretical size of the universe, since we are not able to observe an "end" (and it would make little sense for one to exist of course). It's important to note however that this notion is only useful for mathematical purposes. It is not something that we have "discovered". There exist formal mathematical proofs that infinity exist, but of course this is merely a mathematical proof based on axioms that don't necessarily have merit in reality.

>>11770363
>>11770362
I found the eternal cum fags, Anonymous! Enjoy them!

>>11770055
Since nothing doesn't exist, everything, including infinity, exists

>>11770191
Explain what hyperreals are without pointing to external sources. Protip: you can't, because you dont know yourself.

>>11770384
Me. I'm hyperreal. Next!

>>11770375
Fierce rebuttal

>>11770430
Proclamation != rebuttal

>>11770173
limits are numbers you cumbrained retard

>>11770490
HAHA like fuck they are.

>>11770442
Yes, I was alluding to the fact that it was not a rebuttal, thanks for emphasizing my point

>>11770516
Do you need to allude because nobody respects your direct input? What a pity.

>>11770055
>Does God exist?

>>11770630
Yes. I thought I had settled this argument long ago, but it does amaze me how you humans seem to be able to present the most unique of presentations as to get my attention.

How can I help you and your disbelief in this moment, Anonymous?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6mghjqbqq5g

>>11770173
>Why yes, I did just start calc 1, how did you know?

>>11770055
You are infinite anon.

>>11770658
By virtue of your need to express it, you utter language reject.

>>11770639
pla define god, what’s your evidence for the god hypothesis, how does your model contain quantum mechanics and GR in its limits and how does it outperform current models?

>>11770055
>does zero exist? have you ever seen nothing???
Stop smoking weed

>>11770724
I define God as the center of your attention, addiction, and attribution of all that is worth continuing living for.

>How does my model contain quantum mechanics?

By not needing to ever reference or care about it because it is a cuckold theory in the face of the Alpha Aggregate Anonymous Theory! Or the Vagus Conjecture, if that matters.

>>11770743
so your theory provides... nothing?
not sure why I expected anything else from schizos.

Let me show you how it works.
The universe was pooped out of THE Galactic Buttmonster.
My theory is superior because it makes a testable prediction. As the universe turd was squeezed through the Holy Sphincter, it was compressed and should be expanding.

>>11770763
If you CONCLUDE that is has nothing and decided to set up guardians and some imaginary menagerie of bullshit to defend your frail intellect then what genuine or serious intellect would care about any other syllable you utter or character you type?

>>11770763
Also your theory would require YOU to be the Holy Sphincter.

>>11770055
>Does infinity exist?
In mathematics you give the name "infinity" to some mathematical object of your choice. It is clear that you neither like nor understand mathematics. So when you say "infinity", which kind of thing do you personally refer to?
>Has anyone ever observed something infinite?
The adjective "infinite" is used in mathematical parlor to refer to sets that are not finite. There are lots of those. You probably use the same word in a different sense, like "God is almighty and his wisdom is infinite" or similar crap. In which case how do you observe God's wisdom?

>>11770384
I am not that anon. But it is pretty easy to explain hyperreals from basic principle. Of course if starting from the reals in your view means to relate on "external sources", then you are just moving goalposts.

>>11770774
I didn’t need to conclude anything, as you provided nothing

Infinity is real but not observable. Sorry, sciencetards

>>11770055
human stupidity is infinite.

>>11770098
Fine then
The Real numbers

Does 3 exist?
Has anyone ever observed 3 of something?

>>11770362
That's literally what the word means. in-finite. Not finite. This is a case where the terminology is on point

>>11770893
In your world, "infinity" is the same as the bogeyman who is always hiding under your bed, and who is never there when you peek? Is it a huge leap in your understanding to realize that this is not how the same notion gets used in math and science?

>>11770925
Indeed. But please do not ask the brainlets about "finity" as the opposite of "infinity". It is a sure thread stopper, so we all miss out on the fun.

>>11770065
That doesn't prove infinity exists. It may just prove the reals are not a well-defined set.

>>11771092
>reals are not a well-defined set
lol, good luck with that

>>11770865
You didn't need to conclude because you chose not to find anything worth sharing with others? Oh well, I had such high hopes for your literacy as well.

>>11770055
In what context are we talking about? You can take Peannos paradox or whatever it's called. When you walk a full meter you first walk half a meter, then half the next half a meter etc, this process continues infinitely but converges because the sum converges. It's a formal realization of infinity even though I would myself say it's contrived.

>>11771092
You can do the same thing with the rational numbers. It's for the exact same reason the natural numbers is infinite.

op's gayness

>>11770055
Actual real infinity doesn't exist.
proof: left as an exercise for the reader

>>11770055
No
You can't count higher than the number of smallest discernible elements in the universe