/sci/ - Science & Math

Medium

Fooker

>>11763335
based tooker has returned to us

I went and showed this proof to my dad the other day. He was denying everything I was saying like a retard, and he even started crying when the wickedness of his lies overwhelmed him (or when the wickedness of the lies overwhelmed the body double that I was speaking with) but he would not admit it. He's probably the main one shitting on me in these threads.

>>11763335
>vixra
into the garbage

>mocks me
entire friend and family network sent into the sleep experiment or worse

Btw, if you want forgiveness then try praying to Paul. Praying to Paul can't be any less effective than praying for me to renege on the covenant.

>the Lord will blot out their names from under heaven

And you know what's an interesting in all of this? They are probably going to tell themselves that it was they Lord who was the bad guy in all of this and not the one who convinced them that they should act against the Lord.

>>11763709
Tooker for real when are you going to just kill yourself? It's been decades now of you being an indigent retard kicked out from university just peddling your shitty papers on this godforsaken website. The end of your road can be reached much more quickly by just jumping off a building.

I will never kill myself. I want to kill my enemies' servants' children, my enemies' servants, my enemies' children, and then my enemies, hearing the progressively dreadful lamentations increase along the way. My desire for that is too strong and it will always outweigh any desire I have for respite. I want the satisfaction my making my enemies know that the inheritance I intended for their children will go to their enemies' children instead. I will pay any price for it.

hey look it's that guy who thinks (-inf,inf) is definition of real numbers

>>11764137
Hey look it's a dirty nigger whose whole family is going to get disqualified from entering the kingdom of God because he said, "This is wrong," without also saying what he thinks is right.

>he actually thinks this is how real numbers work

>>11764187
If you disagree, you should have said what you think the problem is and what you think the correct alternative is. Since you didn't, I will disqualify all of your friends and relatives from shitting up the Kingdom of God by having their cunt faces reminding me of this post you made.

People who are used to Satan and like the way Satan does things will think I am a giant asshole for doing the mass exterminations in this way, but it is precisely this system of mass extermination which makes me God and Satan just some nigger. I know how to win, just like I know how to define real numbers.

>>11764206
>If you disagree, you should have said what you think the problem is
1. You haven't defined what a "1D Hausdorff space" is.
2. You haven't defined what "extending infinitely far in both directions" means.
3. You haven't defined what "line" means.
4.You haven't defined what a "cut" is. Also The definition 2.1.4. is formulated as a proposition, not a definition.

>>11764206
define "1D space"
define "extending infinitely far in both directions"
define "chart x"
define "Euclidean metric"
define "cut in a line"

Tooker, I don't understand why write such long papers when all your arguments can be summarized in a single paragraph.

let [math]\tilde{\mathbb{R}} = \mathbb{R} \cup \{ $\}[/math] where [math]$[/math] is not an element of [math]\mathbb{R}[/math]. in particular [math]$ \neq \frac{1}{2}[/math]. next we define [math]\zeta($ + i) = 0[/math]. since the real numbers were not rigorously defined when the Riemann hypothesis was formulated, we might as well take [math]\tilde{\mathbb{R}}[/math] as our definition for real numbers. therefore RH false.

>>11764279
You are completely correct. My life's work has been a mistake. I apologize to everyone for deceiving them.

>>11764344
it's ok man, it happens

>>11764279
Does this R tilde fulfill the Tarski axioms?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarski%27s_axiomatization_of_the_reals

>>11764507
Tarski lived years after Riemann so I don't really see how is it any relevant

>>11764514
By that line of argument, some set (that has historically been part of a conversation in which the word "the real numbers" was uttered) is also not
>relevant
It's not like the axioms are edgy or something

>If x < y, then not y < x. That is, "<" is an asymmetric relation. This implies that "<" is not a reflexive relationship, i.e. for all x, x < x is false.

>If x < z, there exists a y such that x < y and y < z. In other words, "<" is dense in R.

>"<" is Dedekind-complete. More formally, for all X, Y ⊆ R, if for all x ∈ X and y ∈ Y, x < y, then there exists a z such that for all x ∈ X and y ∈ Y, if z ≠ x and z ≠ y, then x < z and z < y.

>x + (y + z) = (x + z) + y.

>For all x, y, there exists a z such that x + z = y.

>If x + y < z + w, then x < z or y < w.

>1 ∈ R.

>1 < 1 + 1.

I don't even know if all of those are effective.

>>11763785
If this is the case when are you going to just get a gun and go for a rampage? There are lootings going on right now, loot a gun store.

>>11764216
>1. You haven't defined what a "1D Hausdorff space" is.
Hausdorff already did it.
>2. You haven't defined what "extending infinitely far in both directions" means.
These all appear in the dictionary and you have not defined "haven't defined"
>3. You haven't defined what "line" means.
This is the first definition
>4.You haven't defined what a "cut" is.
This is Def 2.1.4
>Also The definition 2.1.4. is formulated as a proposition, not a definition.
No, you are wrong. It's the definition of what a cut is, like a dictionary entry for "cut"

>>11764279
You didn't include the proof that some numbers are larger than any natural number, an important result

>>11764622
>If this is the case when are you going to just get a gun and go for a rampage?
As soon as I can command the military forces, I will begin my rampage that day, before the sun sets.

>>11764647
define "1D space"
define "extending infinitely far in both directions"
define "chart x"
define "Euclidean metric"
define "cut in a line"

>>11764833
I assume modest familiarity with the basics because there is no length of no pedantry to which I could go which will avoid the criticism you are using. Even if I included the entire Oxford dictionary as an appendix, you could still ask me to define the words in the definitions in the appendix. You know it too, it's just that you don't think I'm going to torture your friends and family to death.

>>11764840
that's not true. you can assume I know about rational numbers and topological spaces. now define or construct real numbers from this.

>>11764858
>>11764840
>>11764840
>>11764833
Fuck you all
This is now an ELEVEN thread
Like bedroom pop?
Like indie rock?
Like cuco/clairo/joji/billie eilish and all them niggas?
Then you'll definitely enjoy this song!
https://soundcloud.com/elevenshxt/sets/blue-skies

>>11764858
Shut up faggot
This is now an ELEVEN thread
Like bedroom pop?
Like indie rock?
Like cuco/clairo/joji/billie eilish and all them niggas?
Then you'll definitely enjoy this song!
https://soundcloud.com/elevenshxt/sets/blue-skies

>>11763335
>https://vixra.org/abs/1906.0236
The first paper says
"we show that the Riemann zeta function has infinitely many non-trivial zeros on the complex plane."
Hardy and Littlewood showed this in 1921.

Comments: 5 Pages.

>>11763335
> I invent a fictionary non-existent concept which implies RH.
> My concept implies that RH is true.
> Post to /sci/ and profit.
Nice try, summerfag.

>>11764942
Dude, why are you calling others summerfags when you are not familiar with the most basic /sci/ culture? Tooker has been posting here since forever.
>theory that most people jumping to call others newfags are newfags themselves confirmed yet again

>>11764942
>fictionary non-existent concept
what did you even mean by this?

>>11764956
>Tooker has been posting here since forever.
you say this like it's a good thing

it's fucking annoying

>>11764942
>summerfag
Retard

>>11764957
This "Tooker" dude gave links, so you can see for yourself.

>>11764975
Let's go for an exchange of insults, moron.

>>11764647
>As soon as I can command the military forces, I will begin my rampage that day, before the sun sets.

Tooker, let's snap you back into reality for one second. You are already getting old. Not only that, but your delusions about "anal implants" are probably just your schizophrenic interpretations of a severe anal infection that has been growing for years due to your bad hygiene form being a literal hobo. One day, probably sooner than you think, you'll die. And you'll die without having enacted revenge on ANYONE. Not a single soul.

All of your enemies are having sex right now. And the day you die they'll still be enjoying the pleasures of a wet tight pussy.

Going back to fantasy land: Let's say that you decide to bring retribution a day earlier by just getting a gun before your army gets. Your army will still come later, won't it? You don't need to delay.

>>11764858
You are not in the intended audience then if your a priori knowledge is so tiny.

>>11764925
I show it in a different way than they did which solves RH but I will add words there, thanks.

>>11764942
>>11764957
>>11764982
Certainly he meant "fictional."

>>11765039
I'm still much younger than Adolf Hitler was when he got control of the military.

>>11765209
>I'm still much younger than Adolf Hitler was when he got control of the military.

Adolf Hitler was in the army, and then an active politician. He wasn't shitposting on the internet.

>>11765209
>You are not in the intended audience then if your a priori knowledge is so tiny.
sounds like you can't do it

>>11765209
>younger than Adolf Hitler
Who was like 56 when he shot himself. What are your plans?

>>11764177
>kingdom of God
sorry bud, i don't worship abr*hamic deities