/sci/ - Science & Math

like father, like son

>>11757642
How: with a bang, a big one.
Why: God had a porpoise. A sole one.

>>11757642
I hope it wasn’t some divine plan or something cause that would mean a god or civilization or whatever planned on you being a faggot and making this tard thread

>>11757642
>how the big bang happened
The first guy to build a time machine hopped in and decided to go watch the birth of the universe. He didn't take into account the scale factor and so the sudden injection of his mass and energy into a pointlike region of space caused a rapid expansion of everything.
This is also the solution to the matter-antimatter inequality we observe. That's what is left of Steve's dumb ass.

>>11757642

The origin of "the Big Bang" comes from Judeo-Christian ideas.

The Big Bang concept was originally invented by the Christian theologist Robert Grosseteste (1168-1253), first head of the university of Oxford. He had a vision that his Hebrew god Yahweh created a tiny spot of light that exploded rapidly taking the matter – which was simultaneously created by the god – with it to form a spherical universe.

Big Bang Cosmology in the modern sense was conjured up by the Christian Catholic priest Abbe Georges Lemaître.

The pioneering Nobel Prize winning plasma physicist and electrical engineer Hannes Alfvén said about Lemaître:

> "I was there when Abbe Georges Lemaître first proposed this theory. Lemaître was, at the time, both a member of the Catholic hierarchy and a scientist. He said in private that this theory was a way to reconcile science with St. Thomas Aquinas' theological dictum of creatio-ex-nihilo (creation out of nothing)."

> "There is no rational reason to doubt that the universe has existed indefinitely, for an infinite time. It is only mysticism saying the universe was created - whether four thousand or twenty billion years ago.

> "Since religion intrinsically rejects empirical methods, there should never be any attempt to reconcile scientific theories with religion. We must not confuse religion and science. An infinitely old universe, always evolving, isn't compatible with the Book of Genesis."

Lemaître is famous for his description of the beginning of the universe as "A Day without Yesterday" in reference to the Creation account in Genesis.

The Jew George Gamow, another famous Big Bang proponent, had no compunction in describing the graphs of conditions in the Big Bang as "Divine Creation Curves" and sent a copy of his book "The Creation of the Universe" to the then Pope.

[continued below...]

>>11759570

[continued]

In January 1933, the Christian priest Abbe Georges Lemaître travelled with the Jew Albert Einstein to California for a series of seminars. After the priest Lemaître detailed his Big Bang theory, the Jew Einstein stood up, applauded, and said:
> "This is the most beautiful and satisfactory explanation of Creation to which I have ever listened."

Thus Big Bang is theology and mysticism, not science. Lemaître allowed his theological convictions to predetermine the outcome of a scientific inquiry. This violates the scientific method. Furthermore, the Big Bang creatio-ex-nihilo Creationism consists of a universe that's entirely filled by a continuous indivisible distribution of mass with a monotonically decreasing macroscopic density and pressure or a finite averaged macroscopic density and zero pressure in terms of the energy-momentum tensor for a perfect fluid. Therefore it violates the Principle of Equivalence and Special Relativity as required by Einstein himself for his gravitational field model. So not only is it Creationism, it's also schizo.

Conformal cyclic cosmology

>>11759577
Way to not say anything meaningful attempting to give off the impression you did.

>>11757642
>The hole in my ass was filled with hot thick cum
>When nearly fourteen hundred nigger dicks ejaculated, um
>My ass began to fill, my tight brown rim began to spill
>Those nigger dicks they didn't chill
>They fucked my ass (they fucked my face and ass)
>Cock, cum, and hefty seed, unraveling the mysteries
>That all started with a gangbang! Hey!

>>11757661
>porpoise
What does an ocean living mammal have to do with anything?

The answers to this thread prove that /sci/ is <90 IQ.

>>11757642
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hartle%E2%80%93Hawking_state

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero-energy_universe

>>11758139
Heh Steve always wilin'

>>11759570
>>11759577
>wall-of-text schizo
errytime

>>11761964
This doesn't answer the question it's just more fancy way of saying "dont ask that question"

Probably seemed like a good idea at the time

Dunno, but I suspect the net total of the universe is zero, in that matter and anti-matter would probably cancel each other out perfectly if everything was compressed into a singularity.

>>11757642
>why it happened?
Nothing got bored of being nothing, so it something'd.
>how the big bang happened
All the dimensions were having a party at Nothing's house.

>>11760227
Good chuckle

>>11757642
>why
>>>/x/

>>11763050
No anon that's ecks, why is
>>>/y/

>>11762325
maybe it's just a suggestion that time is only a relevant concept within the context of an extant universe and whatever existed before the universe was without "time"

>>11759570
>>11759577
>>11759577
>newfag
>tripfag
>plebbitfag
>schizo
You have to go back

>>11757651
>>11757642
We need to get the scientific community to start calling it "The Big Braaap"

>>11758139
The universe is in fact recursive.

>>11763050
>why
>>>/x/
More like
>why
>>>/h/

>>11762175
Big Bang theory is schizo.

>>11757642
This image is so funny. If you rotate it, it looks like a pot with grid-like cracks. A perfect symbol for the theory it is supposed to represent.