/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11706256
dunno looks fake to me, is there any proof it wasn't put there by the devil to deceive us?

>>11706274
it's the real thing my friend

>>11706274
Are you in the wrong place anon?
Religion is over at /dumbass/

>>11706274
You think the fossil is fake but the devil is real?

I hope scientists discover DNA from preserved dinosaur to create clone.

>>11706811
>>11706828

>>11706832
You can't extract any genetic information. What keeps the information together decays over time. Unfortunately for dinosaurs the shit would have decayed by now and the information no longer bound together. Only way to mimic dinosaur DNA is by doing reverse evolution on birds.

>>11706833
Why didn't you reply to the retard who asked about the Devil testing us with fossils?

>>11706846
Obviously God is just testing us with the Devil anyway.

>>11706256
How many feathers did it have though

Did they scan it to see it’s organ make up? If so I wonder how different their organs are to current day animals.

OH NOOO WHERE'S MY FEATHERINOOOSS?

>>11706256
It's pretty unreal if you think about it. It's the first time we've actually seen what one of them look like.

>>11706861
Your assumptions are out of order.

Seriously, your god told me to tell you to fuck off.

Ignore the derail cucks and lowtier bait takers, this armored 'saur looks fucking cool.

>>11706256
Haha i wonder what its shit smelled like

>>11706833

You can always tell r*ddit kids by their inability to recognize satire when not explicitly indicated

>>11706256
my ansester :)

>>11707966
fuckin lizzard peeple

>>11707578
i think the guy who brought up the devil was being satirical, and the people who replied were. No one was being genuine. What’s your take?

>>11706274
if the devil was real and capable of doing that, it would be far more interesting that some old shitty reptile old fag virgin

>>11706256
There's always the possibility it could turn out to be fake. The Piltdown Man was thought to be genuine for nearly 40 years.

>>11706256

imagine riding on this to battle

i'd fooken slap a war elephant into half with it's mace like tail

>>11706832
>>11706837
What about this?:
>Tests were also run for DNA. A staining substance that binds to DNA was applied to the Hypacrosaurus cells, and the result was similar to what would be expected of modern cells. This is surprising as modern day thinking suggests that DNA will only survive for about a million years, but the fossils date back 75 million years.
Could they extract some genes with this and help the reverse-evolved chicken?

>>11707578 Maybe it's because it doesn't matter if you're satirical or not on the Internet. There are people who actually believe this and people who take you seriously even if you're satirical. This is why it needs serious replies to satirical posts.

>>11709554
the chickensaurus project is so fun to read about.
Didn't they analyse the fossilised microstructure of protein molecules?

>>11706256
I wish it had been something more exotic

>well preserved dinosaur
more like they had just finished sculpting the thing

>>11706256

seems much more recent than what it's said. Can it really stay intact that way for tenths of millions of years?

I do recall about ten yrs ago some grad student accidentally discovered she could melt fossils with some specific agent or acid to extract DNA from it. She was pretty hot too.

>>11706811
But the devil already put 75 "million" year old dinosaur cartilage, cells, and DNA in a fossil to deceive you, dumbass.

https://phys.org/news/2020-02-cartilage-cells-chromosomes-dna-million-year-old.html

>>11706274
I love when genuinely funny bait actually baits people

>>11706256

the video where they are excavating it and it cracks in half is pretty funny

a. fucking. pangolin.

>>11706256
It has a cute face, I want to feed it lettuce or giant slabs of meat, whatever it prefers. And pet it's cute about.

>>11711554
Snout*

>>11709586
>>11706274
>>11706287
>>11706811
>>11706828
>>11706832
>>11706833
>>11706837
>>11706846
>>11706861
>>11706872
>>11706883
>>11706918
>>11706954
>>11707578
>>11708368
>>11708459
>>11709274
>>11709554
>>11709651
>>11710177
>>11710145
>>11710876
>>11710895
>>11711328
>>11711548
>>11711554
>>11711556
You HAVE to go back
you need to go back

>>11711699
>oh no dinosaur is too mainstream

>>11711699
This kind of post should be a bannable offense.

>>11706256
how soon until someone breaks into the museum housing it and fucks it?

>>11706811
Something tells me this is an extremely sophisticated troll. Well played.

Looks beautiful, but have no idea if/how important it is to their field. I'd definitely visit a museum if they had it on display though

Dinosaurs never existed.

>>11712401
That brings up a good question is it gentails preserved

I love ankylosaurian dinosaurs so much, this makes me happy.
I think they are my favourite type of animal to have ever existed.

>>11710503
Once fossilization happens the only limit is geology, so yes.

>>11706256
Its actually a reptillian

>>11712845
>so yes
No, fossilization happened on many thousands of specimens with only geology being a limiting factor (and time is a factor for many aspects of fossils on top of geology) but they were not preserved or "stayed intact" as well as this unique specimen.
The evidence dictates theres another factor involved that limits a fossils ability to be preserved this well, and that factor was clearly absent in this case.

>>11706811
le epic atheism

>>11711699
Go back to where?

>>11712820
youtube is down the hall buddy

>>11706846
Because it's the most fucking obvious bait this board has seen