[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 221 KB, 1528x1486, IMG_20200518_202823.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11690859 No.11690859[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Hey all. I'm a founding member of the Cicada 3301 group. Only two of the first clues were real.

The game is about finding universal repeating patterns in just about anything. I'm sure any member can confirm by the end of this post. Almost right at the start I started working on squaring the circle and I believe to have found it. Maybe not I'm not sure. Reason I'm not sure is that for some reason people are unwilling to let me demonstrate it or accept it as a solution without reasoning with me why. It's driving me crazy that nobody tells me why I'm wrong. I have an instagram account with alot of demonstration of subconscious connections and such which are for those who have stuck upon some roadblock as I've discovered that many of the people who picked up on it have gone way too far to the wrong direction.
It's all just to broaden your perspective.

So, in a nutshell this post is about a scientific breakthrough and announcement of the purpose of the cicada group. I'll release the instagram if there's demand for it but for now I want to keep my intent clear and my head straight. If this is true it is revolutionary, right? I really have no idea. It means we could find out what pi is for real. That's what it says on wiki. I did theorize on it but it is a volatile subject nowadays.

>> No.11690878
File: 171 KB, 1920x1080, q7SB5XI.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11690878

>>11690859
Far out keen to see the math on this one.
Any breakthrough in the theoretical is sourly needed in the world right now.

>> No.11690888

>>11690859
Eric Weinstein felt the exact same way posting his thoughts about a geometric unity on youtube. I hope this is a trend

>> No.11690895

>>11690859

>>>/x/

>>>/x/

>>>/x/

>>>/x/

>>>/x/

>> No.11690896

>>11690878

It should be the solution to the ancient geometric problem of squaring the circle. I didn't inspect what it could be used for but I'm sure for alot of foundational things. The idea of the Cicada group concerned the very fact that if something like this was found, it could be too revolutionary to be considered real. It became reality with the coronavirus when a pandemic broke out that was so sudden, we would not have the means to react to it due to the advances in all our science being constricted by the terminology replacing undiscovered constants. We need the creative mind back in the game.

>> No.11690905

>>11690859
I did something with Shamir's secret sharing a long time ago tangential to Cicada--Glitch Swan. This was before TS and the political nonsense.

>universal repeating patterns

I believe it's a fiber on a associative and the identity properties.

>> No.11690923
File: 333 KB, 1528x1486, IMG_20200519_001858.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11690923

>>11690905
Well, the glitch relates directly very old folklore of certain...things.

Although the context is so much broader than what I reveal here, I only tell what I know to be allowed and to prove a point.

I was ducking before the blue subjects.

>> No.11690955

>>11690923
What is the point?

>> No.11690994

>>11690923
Sounds like the kind of thing euler would write in his letters yet to be translated if you are looking for proof.

>> No.11691112
File: 296 KB, 1528x1486, IMG_20200519_020339.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11691112

>>11690955
Squaring the circle.

I don't want to be involved with any of the what you call political nonsense.
Do you remember why the group was founded and how it formed from privacy to psychological enlightment?
It needs to be corrected, people got it wrong and there was no way to push a credible official clue anymore due to the amount of very convincing fakes.

This is about science, if this is indeed correct it will give enough leverage to push the cicada message through and help those who got their ego twisted to the whole wrong direction.
Roll deep bro.

>> No.11691170

>>11690955
Seems like a very obvious message to focus on the issue at hand.

>> No.11691183

>>11690859
no one cares about cicada. stop larping.

>> No.11691192

>>11690859
Fuck off Danny Witten

>> No.11691489

>>11691112
All im after is a way to travel faster than light. We need new physics and string theory is just another dead end.

>> No.11691493

>>11691112
I support any endeavour into the theoretical. Keep up the good work

>> No.11691684

>>11691112

If you're interested you can find me somewhere and we can have a longer discussion.

>> No.11691885

>>11690859
this is bait, but if it weren't, then that would mean cicada are fucking idiots. there's a pretty trivial proof that you'll learn in any algebra course that you can't square the circle
sage in all fields

>> No.11691908
File: 182 KB, 1528x1486, IMG_20200518_221951.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11691908

>>11691885
Okay, could you tell me why?
The first message has an image with solution. Try the provided evidence and use that to explain to me why I'm wrong.
This is the very issue I am talking about.
You deny it based on already acquired knowledge to be better without the need to inspect any further.

I don't need or want you to care about cicada. I do though.

It's a geometrical solution to a geometrical issue I solved using nothing but a ruler and a compass.
Unless you can tell me why my solution is wrong, why disrespect the countless hours I spent researching?
Please, try the first image just once.
How can that be a bait?

>> No.11691919
File: 202 KB, 1080x1837, Screenshot_20200520_112637.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11691919

I understand it's said to be impossible.
That should be all the more reason to look into it though.

Suggesting that I have any other intent than what I directly stated here is really frustrating since I made it as clear as I ever could.

I've tried to prove it wrong for so long because it's not accepted as a solution. Why do you think I'm on 4chan?

>> No.11691932

>>11690859
what if I told you last year I arrived to the same solution

>> No.11691951
File: 261 KB, 1528x1486, IMG_20200514_224218.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11691951

>>11691932
I would be glad that there are people who know this to be true so that I can be sane again.

>> No.11691970

>>11691951
ah the wonders one can accomplish with enough free time, a square and a compass, but hey, who's gonna believe some friendless, credentialless internet anonymous rando (I'm talking about me) about some possible interesting discovery that actually challenges the official narrative of dumbfuckland, right?
so we got this thing probably solved, now what?

>> No.11691990
File: 256 KB, 1528x1486, IMG_20200516_063624.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11691990

>>11691970
This comment made me feel so good.
You know exactly how I feel.
I got slapped across the face by my peers for this exact reason.

It's not at all about better or worse it's more about right or wrong.

If this gains enough attention through 4chan and is provably the right solution, it should be enough to force those who decide about these things to pay attention to it after which it could be applied to whatever it can be used for.

>> No.11692018

>>11691919
no fucking way

>> No.11692027
File: 573 KB, 1486x1528, IMG_20200514_221911.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11692027

>>11692018
Hahaha yeah literally.

>> No.11692031
File: 65 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11692031

3 * 1 = 3
3 * 2 = 6
3 * 3 = 9
3 * 4 = 12 but 1+2=3
3 * 5 = 15 but 6
* 6 = 18 = 9
* 7 = 14 = 3
etc,

>> No.11692038

>>11691990
are you really cicada?
do you have anything to do with Q?
tangential questions aside, not gonna lie, it also felt nice to know (assumin you actually are cicada and not some glownigger) some intelligent person validated my thoughts.
I hope you're real... you can keep the credit, btw. good luck on whatever you are trying to accomplish! (I wouldn't mind some dedicatory note on your paper when you release it tho "to my fellow friendless rando" or something.. kek)

>> No.11692059
File: 1.85 MB, 1824x3648, IMG_20200519_231631.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11692059

>>11692038
Yeah, I can confirm.
If there is any specific evidence I can provide, that kind of request can only come from another. That's how you know if you've lost contact.

There are a couple interesting things I can provide.

89÷55 results in an interesting version of the golden ratio. The numbers are from fibonacci line.
3.14591459145914, which is fibonacci pi.
Our research with vitruvian man halted at double pentagram.

Regarding the image on the left, what do you call an open coffee filter? lmao

>> No.11692071

>>11692059
>what do you call an open coffee filter?
a flying fuck? lmao I dunno sorry m8, not really good with jokes in English
tell me, what do you call an open coffee filter?
is cicada related to Q in any sorta way?

>> No.11692074
File: 135 KB, 1528x1486, IMG_20200516_173657.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11692074

>>11692038
You know the drill. Credit where credit is due even when the support is mental.

>> No.11692083
File: 340 KB, 1528x1486, IMG_20200514_235509.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11692083

>>11692071
I call it a butterfly.
Not involved with Q or S.
Misdirections.

>> No.11692086

>>11690859
>squaring the circle
>literally a freshman undergrad problem in galois theory to prove this is impossible
seek help

>> No.11692090

Zero is simply Shorthand for Minus one (0.000...1)
Square Root of Minus one (0.000...1) is itself, ∞

(0.000...1)^1/2 = ∞ so ∞^2 = ∞
(0.000...1)^2 = ∞ so ∞^1/2 = ∞

Minus one Operation

Infinity + infinity = infinity
Infinity - infinity = infinity
Infinity x infinity = infinity
Infinity / infinity = infinity

∞ + ∞ = ∞
∞ - ∞ = ∞
∞ x ∞ = ∞
∞ / ∞ = ∞

Doctor VICTOR
Denkenstein

>> No.11692091
File: 1.84 MB, 3648x2736, IMG_20200214_182848.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11692091

>>11692086
I am not interesting in yet another reasoning why it is impossible when the very solution was proven to be impossible in 1882.

Thus I provide the solution.
This only proves you are the core of the issue - use the already acquired knowledge that is being proven wrong as the weapon.

>> No.11692094

>>11692086
I am seeking help as we speak.
Why don't you help me find it?

>> No.11692097

>>11692083
gotcha. I think.
I wish you well, it was nice talking to you, sir!

>> No.11692098

>>11692091
>>11692094
Seek help, retard

>> No.11692100

>>11692090
Two negatives form a positive and thus begins infinity.

>> No.11692103

>>11692098
It's kind of concerning you call plausible new knowledge retarded.

>> No.11692107

>>11692103
It's not plausible, it's easily demonstrable crackpottery. Hence retarded, retard.

>> No.11692109

>>11692100
And now Defined

>> No.11692119
File: 149 KB, 1088x1120, IMG_20200513_154954.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11692119

>>11692107
It's a possible way to find out the real value of pi that can be proven instead of agreed upon. I hope you see things a little more openly in the future when they serve no other agenda than correction.

>> No.11692145

>>11692119
in the world of pretend; 0, and make believe, -1, -2, -3; ... sure ... anything is possible; ... ∞

>> No.11692146

>>11692119
The value of pi isn't under dispute either, and if you removed your chromosome-swollen head from your ass for 5 minutes to read a fucking math book you'd be able to derive its decimal expansion yourself, retard

>> No.11692147

>>11692109
Pair has throughout history been treated as a unit. All the way up until modern age.

>> No.11692150

>>11692146
The value of pi has been under dispute since the very moment it was defined since it was known to not be accurate but most accurate so far.

I'll gladly be your punching bag, throw me some more. I need to be ready to take worse shit for this than what you have.

>> No.11692151

>>11692145
when they call you names you know they are wrong because they have nothing else
>>11692146

>> No.11692154

>>11692150
retard
>>11692151
cope, retard

>> No.11692155

>>11692154
lmao

>> No.11692157

>>11690859
Interesting subject because geometrically it can be done but the radius pi is transendental. That can be expressed and computed to an infinite series as long as pi continues to change the value of the area every new decimal place. Probs best to take a look at this through newton-leibnitz integral valculus notation and see what we can find. Since its thd best tool we have of summing up infinite derivatives of a curve

>> No.11692158

>>11692157
please wait until you're at least 13 before coming on 4chan

>> No.11692160
File: 44 KB, 720x638, Cute Innocent Adorable.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11692160

>>11692090
>Zero is simply Shorthand for Minus one (0.000...1)
>Square Root of Minus one (0.000...1) is itself, ∞
>(0.000...1)^1/2 = ∞ so ∞^2 = ∞
>(0.000...1)^2 = ∞ so ∞^1/2 = ∞
>Minus one Operation
>Infinity + infinity = infinity
>Infinity - infinity = infinity
>Infinity x infinity = infinity
>Infinity / infinity = infinity
And now Defined
>∞ + ∞ = ∞
>∞ - ∞ = ∞
>∞ x ∞ = ∞
>∞ / ∞ = ∞
>Doctor VICTOR
>Denkenstein
you forgot "and now defined", retard.

>> No.11692162

>>11692160
stop linguistically impersonating me, retard.

>> No.11692166
File: 201 KB, 1528x1486, IMG_20200518_233559.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11692166

>>11692157
Yes, thank you!
It states on the geometrical problem itself that this gives the accurate value of pi, but then again pi is transcendental.
As far I've understood pi was based on being the diameter's relation to thr circumference.

So if it can be done geometrically yet we come across contradictory things, it definitely should be looked into.
Reason is so refreshing to see.

>> No.11692168

>>11692160
>>11692162
samefag.

>> No.11692170
File: 9 KB, 416x120, retard.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11692170

>>11692168
>filename

>> No.11692183

calling dr. denkenstein, dr. denkenstein, dr. denkenstein. retard.

>> No.11692191
File: 204 KB, 1562x1606, IMG_20200512_022559_568.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11692191

It's not okay to push a question bothering you to another person as their problem to find out how they would solve it.

Let's focus on the geometric solution and not how good you are at debating a fact, since that will leave you with two wrong answers.

>> No.11692195

>>11692191
Let's not waste our time. Instead, you can take your medications and read Dummit & Foote, and I will call you a retard some more

>> No.11692202

>>11692195
retard squared (retard^2) equals retard.

>> No.11692206

>>11690859
lol yall are retarded, if ur cicada confirm with pgp signature

>> No.11692207

>>11692202
I am shocked and offended by this mimicry and I will be taking my business elsewhere.