/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 308 KB, 518x421, 1588974574523.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun May 17 22:34:04 2020 No.11684039 [Reply] [Original]

>Tfw understand rigourously but not intuitively

Anonymous Sun May 17 22:41:37 2020 No.11684052

>>11684039
Butwha if we took BOTH and under standed, dare i say, if you will, if at all, "rigourituvely"? Get it? Woah dude. The universe of wonders. Enjoy the ride my friend. We are but a speck in an infiniTIONAL array manifold of perception space. Now let that sink in.

>>	Anonymous Sun May 17 22:43:16 2020 No.11684056 >>11684039 explain

>>	Anonymous Sun May 17 22:43:58 2020 No.11684058 you're doing fine, anon. just keep practicing until you get it

>>	Anonymous Sun May 17 22:45:15 2020 No.11684062 File: 980 KB, 360x360, 664b4e6e007c58360b3f6b863b3bd894.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun May 17 22:47:40 2020 No.11684068 >>11684062 Lol the birds don't move adequately though

>>	Anonymous Sun May 17 22:53:25 2020 No.11684086 >>11684039 never gonna make it talent > hard work

>>	Anonymous Sun May 17 22:57:03 2020 No.11684099 >>11684052 >t. understands intuitively, but not rigorously

>>	Anonymous Mon May 18 00:37:41 2020 No.11684325 File: 23 KB, 400x400, 1581115762598.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>11684039 Epsilon delta for me desu Any anons with an explanation?

>>	Anonymous Mon May 18 00:41:32 2020 No.11684332 File: 321 KB, 558x744, yang_cry.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >t. kinesiologist who can't built muscle

Anonymous Mon May 18 08:08:15 2020 No.11685008
File: 186 KB, 640x512, 1544423471810.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>11684039
>understand intuitively but not rigorously
>>11684325
You can ensure that [math]f(x)[/math] is arbitrarily close to [math]f(x_0)[/math] by making [math]x[/math] sufficiently close to [math]x_0[/math].

>>	Anonymous Mon May 18 08:10:17 2020 No.11685011 >>11685008 Slight rephrasing. *by asking for [math]x[/math] to be sufficiently close to [math]x_0[/math].

>>	Anonymous Mon May 18 08:10:17 2020 No.11685013 >>11684325 epsilon is just a small number that we can wish away when convenient. t. physicist

>>	Anonymous Mon May 18 08:10:43 2020 No.11685015 >>11684039 I've always been the inverse...

>>	Anonymous Mon May 18 18:35:25 2020 No.11686909 >>11684039 this is pretty much any proof by induction desu

>>	Anonymous Mon May 18 18:39:32 2020 No.11686928 >>11684086 >i'm smart but lazy

>>	Anonymous Mon May 18 18:49:12 2020 No.11686957 >>11684039 Congrats on being part of the string theory starter pack, it only goes down from here

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]