[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 10 KB, 608x408, orbital.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11682252 No.11682252 [Reply] [Original]

Made some improvements with a few Anon to the simulation.

4chan, how come when you average numbers in a grid it creates stable orbitals? Notice how the vectors are rotating the "nucleus" and not expanding or contracting?

>> No.11682279

imagine if you learned real physics

>> No.11682282

>>11682279

Although I am a brainlet. This model is consistent with physical observation.

>> No.11682287
File: 16 KB, 797x389, 2 orbitals.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11682287

>>11682252

>> No.11682296
File: 9 KB, 450x335, orbital3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11682296

>>11682252

>> No.11682299

>>11682282
Pretty interesting that nobody outside of a few uneducated 4chan schizos care, then.

>> No.11682307
File: 16 KB, 853x415, Shared electron.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11682307

>>11682252

"Shared electron"

>> No.11682341

>>11682252

If anyone is interested we can have some kind of Zoom or discord meeting and I can walk anyone interested through the automaton, and we can build it together so you can follow along and see for yourself that there are no tricks here. These images really are being generated from numbers averaging on a grid, i.e. "energy over space".

If this is real, Anon, and I think it is. It is worthwhile.

>> No.11682351

>>11682341
It is really an automaton, good job. It is also not physics whatsoever.

>> No.11682364

Oh shit, is Schizo Gary back? Hey what about those t-shirts? Are you done being “Tucker”?

>> No.11682389

>>11682252
>>11682341
Isn't running the simulation in excel impossibly slow?
Why not learn to code and make a simple grid yourself?

>> No.11682899

Ok Gary

>> No.11683361

>>11682282
>This model is consistent with physical observation.
ah, really? name even one.

I see this claim from you schizo posters all the time, but it never goes beyond "it is consistent with physical observation". oh yeah? well how the hell can you make that claim without knowing anything about physics? how can you compare ideas if you don't know anything about the what you are trying to compare? that's absurd. god damn stupid people

>> No.11683380

>>11682307
thats aliasing not an electron fuck

>> No.11683443

>>11682299
>who is Stephen Wolfram and Eric Weinstein

>> No.11683480

>>11682252
Learn to code this using Python for fucks sake anon