[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 1.47 MB, 4096x2214, 1561926683008.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11623553 No.11623553 [Reply] [Original]

How much of an impact on gravity would be caused once we start mining large amounts of material from the solar system back to earth?

>> No.11623588

>>11623553
I always wonder how much they could add or subtract from the moon's mass before it starts fucking up the tides

>> No.11623601

>>11623588
I have wondered about this every time I hear people talk about how much material is out there for us to use. It seem like people don't think about the long term impact.

>> No.11623623
File: 153 KB, 1125x930, goy vs soy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11623623

>>11623601
you don't think about the long term impact of spending your time wondering about what happens if outlandish sci-fi scenarios come true.

>> No.11623637

>>11623623
I'm pretty sure that space mining isn't sci-fi.

>> No.11623644

>>11623553
String theory solves space mining.

>> No.11623846

>>11623588
The moons massive enough we could mine a shit ton of it before any issues started popping up, and really we could replace any mass we take by setting up a landfill on the dark side or something.
But asteroid mining wouldn't have any long term impact and theyre far richer in mental.

>> No.11623858

>>11623588
>>11623601
Are you guys being serious?
I can't tell.

>> No.11625936

Mining Engineer here, what ever machine they use better be really durable.

>> No.11625943

this
>>11623858
Is this a shitposting thread or no, hard to tell

>> No.11625955

>>11625936
do you think it would make more sense to tug smaller asteroids to a central processing location large enough to conduct most repairs in house?

>> No.11625957

>>11623553
>once we start
So naive

>> No.11625965

>>11623637
I think you've failed to consider just how massive the Earth is. Even adding the entire mass of the Moon is only an increase of ~1%. Every year the Earth loses 55,000,000kg naturally (net effect from losing atmosphere and gaining meteorites).

Any effect on gravity just isn't going to be noticeable

>> No.11626057

>>11625955
Maybe small ones, but I think we are a long way away from that capability. Rock crushing requires a huge amount of energy. Start with how to get MegaWatts of power on a planet first.

>> No.11626108

>>11623553
None. The Earth is fucking massive.

>> No.11626168

>>11625957
Most people don't know about the secret Nazi moon base. No reason to ridicule them about something they were never taught.

>> No.11626763

>>11623553
Who says we need to mine the moon or Mars?

>> No.11627227

>>11626763
Venus is a naturally easier mining destination after all.

>> No.11628997

>>11623553

I just hope the US and China can share it

>> No.11629447

>>11623553
If we mined 0.00001 grams periodically, it will decrease the gravity.

>> No.11630531
File: 67 KB, 300x345, 1395380063698.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11630531

>>11625965
>net effect from losing atmosphere
Wait what