/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11505469
not science or math
fuck off back to >>>/b/

>>11505469
According to bottoms I've surveyed, yes.

>>11505469
It's a part of growing older.
When I was starting to become too old to be a twink anymore I changed from a bottom to a vers-top.

>>11505604
I am 5 foot 8 and thus to short to penetrate

>>11505607
Not really though. I'm 5'8 and I had a 6'2 bottom bf

As a top, straight man, i have no answers for you.

You are a dumb gay.

>>11505609
This.
Just find a position that works for you both.

I am a bisexual vers male with a desire to become heterosexual

I end up sleeping with gay guys that I meet infrequently because I'm an autismo with typically male hobbies and it just works out that way every year or so but I would prefer to be hetero and trad.

>>11505469
When that happens you will be uglier (for the hormones) and you will be bigger, you could become one of those fag bears.

>>11505613
savage

>>11505617
>trad larper

>>11505621
No larps, I don't like being a fagmo, it kinda fills me with shame and I am too lazy and spergy to pursue women, being hetero would create an incentive to pursue women

>>11505617
>I would prefer to be hetero
Why? Women are obnoxious.

>>11505628
Repressing just leads to unhappiness

>>11505609
6 foot two bottom

>>11505629
gays are for the most part more promiscuous, as bad as roasties at attention whoring, cheaters, disease-infested, bring shame on the family name, and can't provide you biological children (they would prob molest anyways)

Being bisexual is my great shame, and it is only due to my own laziness that I leverage it to vent my sexual frustration.

>>11505634
Yes? Why would that be hard to believe?

>>11505635
>the same tired /pol/ buzzwords

>>11505637
it's normie gay twitter culture, they're as bad as roasties, obsessing over height, getting pozzed and having lots of casual sex, and shitty memes

>>11505635
Only the femmy flamboyant gays are like that

>>11505637
Bottoms are women
6 foot 2 is too tall to be penetrated
t. bottom

>>11505643
>muh poz
Those people are universally reviled and a few

>>11505643
Why is having casual sex bad? As long as it's safe and you take precautions of course

>>11505635
Finding a good guy is still better than finding a good girl. Both of which are rare but do exist out there.

>>11505648
That's such bullshit. You see tall bottoms on grinder and tinder all the time. My bf was

>>11505651
>Why is having casual sex bad?

Spreads disease, ruins pair bonding, is damaging on a sociological level. A faggot retard like yourself would never understand new lovers blowing out your asshole every other day is nothing like a steady loving relationship, I've been on both sides of that fence so I would know.

>>11505656
Nice Incel dictionary dump

>>11505656
Even if you're hetero casual sex and dating is how you find someone to fall in love with

>>11505655
Just cuz you can doesn’t mean you should