[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 72 KB, 359x512, unnamed (6).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11471808 No.11471808 [Reply] [Original]

So , is I.T.U a brick wall or what ? What are the latest developments ?

>> No.11471815

>>11471808

why dont you try it and find it out for yourself?

>> No.11471838

>>11471808
Refuted by von Scholze.

>> No.11472878

>>11471808
>What are the latest developments ?
A recent paper:
On Mochizuki's idea of Anabelomorphy and its applications
https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.01890

Upcoming papers:
Taylor Dupuy and Anton Hilado. Probabilitic Szpiro, baby Szpiro, and explicit Szpiro from Mochizuki’s corollary 3.12.
Taylor Dupuy and Anton Hilado. Statement of Mochizuki’s corollary 3.12.
Taylor Dupuy and Kirti Joshi. Perfectoid anbelomorphy.

Series of four upcoming conferences:
Foundations and Perspectives of Anabelian Geometry
https://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/plp/pmzibf/files/May2020.html

Combinatorial Anabelian Geometry and Related Topics
https://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/plp/pmzibf/files/June2020.html

Invitation to inter-universal Teichmüller Theory (IUT)
https://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/plp/pmzibf/files/iut1.html

Inter-universal Teichmüller Theory (IUT) Summit 2020
https://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/plp/pmzibf/files/iut2.html

>> No.11472892

>>11471808
largely regarded as incorrect and unfix-able by math people

>> No.11472906

>>11471808
Retroactively refuted by Archimedes

>> No.11473192

>>11472892
>largely regarded as incorrect and unfix-able by math people
lol

>> No.11473228

>>11473192
who outside of Shinichi and RIMS think its legit?

>> No.11473240

>>11473228
>who outside of Shinichi and RIMS think its legit?
Fesenko, Dupuy, Joshi, Hilado, Saidi, Porowski

>> No.11473357

>>11473240
>"just trust us bro its right"
>proof is left to the reader

>> No.11473376
File: 158 KB, 770x511, Scholze.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11473376

>>11473357
>"just trust us bro its wrong"
>fails to respond to Mochizuki's counter-arguments

>> No.11473859

>>11471808
either explain your math or fuck off mochi

>> No.11473892
File: 264 KB, 1024x682, pip.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11473892

>>11471808
I like how this absolute madman inadvertently proved abstract math is pure unadulterated bullshit, and that if you go deep the rabbit hole enough mathematicians can't really understand shit each other is saying.
He has my unending admiration.

You guys can stop doing your sperg puzzles now and start studying experimental sciences.

>> No.11473951

>>11473892
But he proved the ABC Conjecture, which may be important for the development of future applications in the natural sciences in a few years.

>> No.11473983

>>11473892
Based , fuck pure math.

>> No.11473998

>>11473376
>whoever gets the last word is right

>> No.11474017
File: 56 KB, 1172x659, EA42mJJXYAEzxWF_(2) (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11474017

>>11473998

>> No.11474041

He's almost right. IUT is like alchemy-a few halting steps from an explosion of innovation.

>> No.11474059

>>11473951
Anything that has a real life application doesn't need a proof.

>> No.11475282

It's legit

>> No.11475289

>>11473951

His proof hasn't been verified.

>> No.11475291

>>11475289
>His proof hasn't been verified.
Except by >>11473240

>> No.11475316

>>11473998
>>whoever gets the last word is right
If all arguments from one side are exhausted, then yes, that's how peer review works.