/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11440359
Sawdust

>>11440377
You’re joking

>>11440359
flour.

>>11440359
>electric sparks in powder form

>>11440403
?

>>11440412
>What is grammar
>>11440415
!

>>11440408
Maybe nitrated

>>11441206
Not necessary.
See "dust explosion"

>>11440359
Iron powder/shavings are splosive as fuck, my nigga

>>11440359
literally anything that can be oxidized, the good ones have already been said

>>11440359
The second panel in your picture is so unbelievably based it fucking hurts.

FUCK academia's need to source fucking EVERYTHING. Hey, assholes. Plato wasn't the only one in the entire world to fucking THINK, you fucking retards.

Gunpowder.
Air-dispersed non-dairy creamer.

>>11441483
thanks for gettin me to read that shit my nigga. i agREEEEEEEEEEE wholeheartedly

>>11441516
Did Debussy invent fucking thinking? Did Aristotle invent the fucking concept of speculation?

How about giving ME, the fucking AUTHOR OF THIS THESIS, a little credit here? Should I just suck every dead dude's dick whenever I have the same idea as him?

Today I made a ham and cheese sandwich, and dipped the bread in an egg batter out of curiosity. THANKS, MONTE CRISTO. LET ME SUCK YOUR FUCKING CHODE.

Fuck academia.

>>11441522
lmao

>>11440359
Flour and coal dust are known to cause huge and damaging explosions. Coal dust explosions have sunk many coal fired ships. Making black powder can ignite thanks to sparks from build up of static charges.

Nano particles of aluminium is extremely explosive.

>>11441227
Cool, never heard of it before, but I doubt that would work in a half-inch airtight steel pipe.
>>11441268
How fine should the powder be and how much? I get heaps of iron filings from ground sparklers.
>>11441467
>Human flesh in sulphuric acid
No thanks
>>11441483
Fuck, imagine Tesla having to cite Marconi or Edison for an independent invention (Jewgle it).
>>11441508
Captain obvious
>>11441522
Might as well just name the pig and make it necrophilia.
>>11441586
Coal dust sounds good.

>>11440359
>>11441610
You're trying to make a pipe bomb? Is that it? You're going to blow up your school because shit sucks? I'm really fucking disappointed in you, because that is NOT the way to go about your life.

What you NEED is a small blasting cap to affect the primary explosive component, in which the initial heat and pressure will detonate the more volatile composition that should make up the majority of your bomb.

>>11441639

Hello FBI how are you today

Daily reminder that you can synthesize household bleach into potassium nitrate using a one hundred dollar electrolysis kit from Amazon.

Double daily reminder not to buy all your supplies from one store, and to purchase your """""""cake ingredients"""""" over a long period of time spanning more than a few months.

Triple daily reminder: They have a watchlist for people buying nitrogen-fixed fertilizer now

>>11441639
WTF? I had a great school. This is just a hobby of mine, and it ain’t pipe I’m making, but rather muskets.
Nice Ockham’s Razor, though. I’ll give you that.
>>11441643
The fuck beast imperator is doing well, thanks.
>>11441650
What would the formulae be for those?

>>11441639
take this pic please

>>11443054
Lol

>>11440359
Ammonia and bleach

>>11443785
Yeah, right

>>11440359
Nice try FBI

>>11440359
White phosphorus, black power, smokeless gunpowder, fluorine

>>11447314
>White Phosphorus
>In Oz
I’m sure that’d work out well.

>>11447818
Matches?

>>11441610
>>11443031
>air tight steel pipe
>muskets
yeah of course because a barrel pipe is sealed on both ends, right.

a dust explosion in a small tube won't work well anyway, it needs a larger volume of air to burn. if you are looking into propellants bp or nc are the things you should be looking into, not dust explosions.

>>11440359
Most solids in powder form are explosive, some more than others depending on it's affinity to the components of atmosphere (oxigen in air is one specific case)
If the particles are slowly oxidized on their surface, the powder becomes inert. If they have non oxidized active surface they may get oxidized explosively fast either by exposure to a steady current or blast of oxygen or even on their own just sitting there on the air.

I’ve read online that ferrocium (conventional lighter flint rods) is highly flammable as is ‘urinal cakes’, (naphthalene, I think). So if I mortar and pestled either of those, it may shoot. I just don’t know how powerful they would be.
>>11447915
I’ve tried that. Trouble is, it’s very tedious shaving match heads off.
>>11447959
Well a .50 caliber lead ball or cylinder won’t go far if it’s not sealed tight in the barrel; it would drop out the front and the gun would turn into a 2 metre long scorching dragon’s breath flamethrower (this has happened before) because I use finely powdered sparklers (which have iron filing in them) as I am yet to make BP or NC.
Yes, I agree. Dust explosions won’t work in a confined space, but on an intriguing note, thermobarric weapons utilise dust explosions to literally ignite the air.
>>11447983
I think solids with water would have a harder time burning, like flour, id est.
Even iron filings work, albeit slowly. I’m guessing I have a narrow range of ‘good’ powders that ‘deflagrate’ forcefully fast but don’t ‘detonate’ like a grenade.

>>11449122
Mate, it’s called the Armstrong match for a reason. Don’t forget to mix in the matchbox’s starter on the side. It Takes its time, but it gives its reward.

>>11450498
Armstrong mix*
Use your Napoleon Stick to double-tap Steve Jobs, will you?

>>11450498
I might give it another try if I could make the process faster.
>>11450501
Ha, I wish.

>>11452245
You better

>>11453204
Maybe

Get a better teacher, faggot