[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 121 KB, 780x716, Global List.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1142201 No.1142201[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Welcome a new, fair, and balanced list.

Enjoy /sci/

>> No.1142206
File: 222 KB, 1920x1200, 1275857210820.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1142206

here we go !

>> No.1142215

imokaywiththis.jpg

>> No.1142216

Mehh, depends on the major and whether it's for graduate or undergraduate.

>> No.1142219
File: 246 KB, 2400x1600, 163017373QPTnnp_fs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1142219

SUP BITCHES

>> No.1142226

no argument from me.

U of T fag here

>> No.1142223

wheres CalTech!?

>> No.1142231

>>1142223
Hopefully not on your list of potential schools if you can't even read.

>> No.1142235

Go Waterloo Engineering!

>> No.1142255
File: 65 KB, 683x1024, 1275942201326.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1142255

now all we need is a list where all the hottest bitches be at for us to teach at

>> No.1142258

What graduate school should I go to for molecular biology in America.

>> No.1142268

>>1142235

Yeah, that's what I think too. It's easier to get into U of T than it is for Waterloo engineering.

>> No.1142283

>all pretentious dickery schools
Imagine that, the schools that spend the most on advertising and PR and attracting trust-fund babies fool people into thinking they're "the best." Protip: grade inflation does not make you smarter.

>> No.1142280

UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA REPRESENT MOTHERFUCKERSSSS

>> No.1142279

>>1142268

>harder to get into =/= better program

http://www.engineering.utoronto.ca/About/Engineering_in_the_News/03_09_10b.htm

>> No.1142285

>>1142268
WATERLOO:

Program Name: Engineering
Average
Percent who received an entering average of 95%+: 9.2%
Percent who received an entering average between 90% and 94%: 36.6%
Percent who received an entering average between 85% and 89%: 41.6%
Percent who received an entering average between 80% and 84%: 10.9%
Percent who received an entering average between 75% and 79%: 1.7%
Percent who received an entering average between 70% and 74%:
0.0%
Percent who received an entering average below 70%: 0.0%
Overall Average: 89.0%

http://analysis.uwaterloo.ca/docs/cudo_2009/htmlSectionB.php#sectionb3

UofT:
Engineering Average
Percent who received an entering average of 95%+ 13.2%
Percent who received an entering average between 90% and 94% 40.1%
Percent who received an entering average between 85% and 89% 30.6%
Percent who received an entering average between 80% and 84% 15.1%
Percent who received an entering average between 75% and 79% 1.0%
Percent who received an entering average between 70% and 74% 0.0%
Percent who received an entering average below 70% 0.0%

Overall Average 89.9%

http://www.utoronto.ca/about-uoft/measuring-our-performance/cudo/cudo-2009/admission.htm

>> No.1142295
File: 26 KB, 320x320, 1275882925918.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1142295

>>1142283

lol he's mad because he couldn't make the cut

>> No.1142298

>>1142285
Take that, Waterloo faggots.

>> No.1142302

>>1142285
>>1142279

ouch........

>> No.1142304

lol i got into UCL and Imperial ...

but never went out and opted for somewhere close to home out of disappointment of the Cambridge reject

i always think maybe i made a mistake ... ?

but then I'm still doing a PhD so it's not like i've failed... is it /sci/?

>> No.1142309

>>1142285
>>1142268
Let's not start a battle, I just like waterloo because of it's coop program and it's reputation in Ontario industry.

>> No.1142320

>>1142309
P.S. The higher average comes from engsci mainly.

>> No.1142315

>>1142268

Yeah, uwaterloo has accepted way more people than it has in the past. I think there has been around a 20% increase in undergrads, so yeah, they have definitely lowered their standards in the past four years.

>> No.1142314

>>1142295
Didn't even try. I went to a local, accredited, and cheap state school. Enjoy paying massive amounts of money for getting the same education I am.
Oh wait, except you're probably still in high school, with a 2.0 major that you'll "improve next year" so that you can get into MIT, right?

>> No.1142317

UBC fag here, seems fine. Except CalTech should be above Harvard.

>> No.1142323
File: 30 KB, 387x512, 11113087.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1142323

>>1142314

lol he's mad because he couldn't make the cut

>> No.1142324

princenton and harvard are bullshit schools..

im in grad school - just started - and most of the papers about complex systems are from public ivies. So, from that list, only UCB is relevant.

Also in college i NEVER read a paper from harvard, princeton or caltech.

>> No.1142325

Univesity of Buenos Aires FTW

>> No.1142326

>>1142314
I`m in Canada, none of our top 5 has a tuition above 6.5 grand.

>> No.1142327

>>1142309
Yea but UofT has a much better reputation (especially internationally, check any ranking), also has a big co-op program (PEY), is harder to get into, and has a much bigger endowment(2.5 billion vs 250 mil), etc.

>> No.1142330

>>1142304
I went to Oxford but don't have a PhD therefore

you > me

I guess. But my degree will still sound better to uneducated fucks. So Me > you for the majority of people in the world.

>> No.1142335

>>1142320
umad?

>> No.1142336

>>1142314
I'm in the UK we are 3K/year tuition. And we're furious about it. It used to be 1K/year up until four years ago.

>> No.1142339

>>1142327
The ranking and reputations are similar and don't mean much. They are both good schools but I chose Waterloo over UofT because I hate the city and I liked the Waterloo coop program better than PAY.

>> No.1142340

What about individual countries? What about Germany?

>> No.1142344

It's free in some Euro countries.

>> No.1142351

>>1142336
Damn, screw you guys. I pay $10k/yr and my school is cheap. Damn first-world nations where they don't believe education is only for the rich!

>> No.1142354

>>1142335
Nope, just making an observation. I just chose Waterloo over UofT for personal reasons.

>> No.1142355
File: 12 KB, 625x289, MacCleans.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1142355

>>1142285

http://tools.macleans.ca/ranking2010/generateranktable.aspx

>> No.1142356

>>1142339
PEY is better because you're able to work for a whole 12 or 16 months. A lot of employers don't like hiring Waterloo students because they can only work for like 4 months, so it's not worth hiring someone for just that amount of time.

>> No.1142362

>>1142355
Macleans is a sack of shit as any good Canadian should know.

>> No.1142371

>>1142327

>>1142355
>>1142355
>>1142355

>> No.1142374

>>1142355

University of Toronto
1 in Canada, 27 world

University of Waterloo
7-18 Canada, 201-302 world

http://www.arwu.org/Country2009Main.jsp?param=Canada

Engineering and information technology
University of Toronto 9th world
University of Waterloo 27th world

http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/hybrid.asp?typeCode=419


http://grad-schools.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-graduate-schools/top-engineering-schools

etc

>> No.1142380

UofT fag here,
I'mokaywiththis.png

>> No.1142385

>>1142374
Also, UofT has a MUCH bigger endowment, and a higher entering average for engineering.

>> No.1142390
File: 38 KB, 562x437, HA_HA_HA_OH_WOW.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1142390

>>1142355
>MacCleans.png
>MacCleans

>> No.1142392

Why are we fighting over rankings? They're hardly consistent between sources. Sounds like a cock measuring contest to me.

>> No.1142394
File: 39 KB, 275x290, mike_lazaridis_web.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1142394

>>1142362

>> No.1142397

>>1142223
Um...on this?

I don't know what you're getting at.

>> No.1142402

>>1142385
>endowment
>penis
My dick is bigger than yours.

>> No.1142408

>>1142374

Waterloofag here. Even I wouldn't do graduate school at UWaterloo. Only the undergrad is good here.

>> No.1142414

>>1142268
>>1142285

>> No.1142419

>>1142414
>Ignoring engsci

>> No.1142425

>>1142414
>>1142315

>> No.1142428

>>1142419
>>implying engineering science is not a program at UofT and should be ignored just because it does not fit your agenda

ps: engsci is a small program, it is not skewing the average much.

>> No.1142431

Sure is a lot of Canadiafags ITT.

>> No.1142437

>>1142431
Sue us, Canada's awesome.

>> No.1142440
File: 12 KB, 776x776, Jayhawk.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1142440

Oh the butthurt.

Don't forget the University of Kansas, underdog of the midwest.

>> No.1142450

the only uoft campus that matters is st. george. the other two are garbage.

provemewrong.jpg

>> No.1142458

>>1142450
You are indeed correct.

>> No.1142476

>>1142371

>>1142374
>>1142385
>>1142285

>>1142390

>> No.1142477

ETH Zurich is good in the Eurofag list, but Universitaet Heidelberg also belongs somewhere there.

>> No.1142543

mcgill here
should be UofT, UBC, McGill

>> No.1142562

Canadafag here. Was accepted to Toronto, BC, and Alberta. Decided to go to Calgary instead, because I'd get paid to. How many of you made a profit off of your undergrad, after living expenses?

>> No.1142568

Ausfag here (not that anyone cares)
>Australian National University
The only reason that shithole is on International lists is because it has 'Australia' in its name... University of New South Wales is where anyone good enough goes for sci/math

>> No.1142593

>>1142568
>>not that anyone cares

Correct.

>> No.1142615

lulz i found sum child porn featuren christopeher pooolar bear hearways :tinyurl dawt com / 39poqjq 922bde513f55c65dd13ae6ac668857eb

>> No.1142626

>>1142593

LOOOOL

>> No.1142649

Canadafag who got to turn down UoT and UBC to go to the US like all smart Canadians.

>> No.1142669

>>1142649
Not all of us can afford massive tuition.

>> No.1142676

>>1142649

yeah , quite expensive, like i won't be living in debt once i graduate which is great because i can buy my own place and start a real life and shit, grow up.

>> No.1142682

>CalTech below Princeton and Harvard for science
>No Stanford
No fucking way can you do a top 5 for sciences. You might as well US News it and have 5 schools in position 1, 3 schools in position 2, etc.

Kind of useless without major aswell. Seriously, for physics, Princeton above Harvard? Bullshit. For math?, yeh it works. For engiqueering? Both schools suck.

1.) MIT is the onyl thing good about that list.

Also,
>ICL above SFI
>UCL over ICL

What the fuck?

>> No.1142683

Fuck ya, University of Alberta represent

>> No.1142704

the top tier competition in Canada is quite stiff it changes every couple years for a short period of time, it's an interesting thing when you map it's frequency.

but then again for me that level of stats is like 1+1 for you guys, lol. I'm a genius.

>> No.1142722

>>1142626
I CARE. Stupid segregation of universities there, canada only has about 12 million more people than Australia, and get's its own list

Obviously made by a Canadafag.

>> No.1142739

>>1142722
ONLY 12 million? ONLY?

That's over half your fucking population.

>> No.1142750
File: 22 KB, 324x450, zach.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1142750

>>1142722

australia is like brazil

hue
huehuehue

>> No.1142759

>cal tech lower than princeton


gtfo

>> No.1142765

>>1142722
Yeah but Canada is in the G8 and contributes to the world. Also, by your reasoning China and India should have their own lists.

>> No.1142766

>>1142722
Either that, or Canadian universities shit all over Australia's. Canada's top universities are on par (in terms of representation on 'worlds best' lists) with the UK and Japan.