[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 70 KB, 750x751, 82974FF1-D714-46EA-9DE7-3593292AB15B.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11380368 No.11380368 [Reply] [Original]

When I was here a few days ago, there were only a few low quality bait threads. Now, almost every front page thread is one. Did >>>/pol/ raid us again?

>> No.11380388

You're using two incidents separated by a few days. Not nearly enough data. Perhaps you are the low quality bait.

>> No.11380401

>>11380388
I did not intend for there to be a sampling bias. To clarify, I normally browse /sci/ regularly but haven’t for a few days, and now I’m noticing that there are way more bait threads than before, much of it either being about evolution or irrelevant /pol/ banter

>> No.11380402

>>11380368
Canadian on /pol/ pushing plasma cosmology nonsense got btfo hard and proceeded to spam the fuck out of /sci/ and /pol/

>> No.11380416

>>11380368
I've been wondering if I should stop posting clamped, vaccinated, circumcised, and actually make an effort to elevate and uphold the quality of dialogue on this board. However prior experience I think has shown that it is not possible, at least, not alone, and no one ever gets on board with anything I try to do.

I think the world is perhaps too far gone. Kali-yuga, phoenix from the ashes, from dust you came and to dust you shall return. Try to act to guide in the current course, save as many who can listen as possible, reshape and rebuild with whatever remnant remains. Or not.

glamped.
Vaxxegginated.
durgumdized

>> No.11380441
File: 475 KB, 1080x1020, 1558941645191.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11380441

>>11380368
>Did >>>/pol/ raid us again?

>> No.11380446
File: 281 KB, 480x360, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11380446

>>11380368
>did /pol/ raid us again
>us
lel youre trying so hard to fit in

>> No.11380447

>>11380401
>bait thread
define 'bait thread'

>irrelevant /pol/ banter
define this as well. nothing you are saying makes much of any sense if you dont explain what you mean by the words you are making up

>> No.11380469

>>11380447
Sorry that you have a limited vocabulary

>> No.11380558

>>11380469
thanks for proving my point. you dont even know what youre saying

>> No.11380566

>>11380402
seriously? that's hilarious

>> No.11380695

1% is not very likely faggot