/sci/ - Science & Math

I think I bite off my wrist hair in my sleep.

>>11351717
I'm not flexible enough for this to be a possibility for me. Also is this just a subtle joke about smartwatches?

>>11351710
Yes. We've known low intensity modulated and continuous wave microwaves were biologically active since the 1950s. I don't know why I bother anymore, because no one can believe it, and they can't bother to check.
>>11350966

LTE is also highly active, and damaging. Refer to eg
Broom 2019 - Early-Life Exposure to Pulsed LTE Radiofrequency Fields Causes Persistent Changes in Activity and Behavior in C57BL/6J Mice
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bem.22217

>>11351742
Just saved that pastebin link's contents, very interesting, I'd never heard about EM waves passing through intracellular fluid channels in higher concentration, now it makes sense how the effect on biochemistry could be so pronounced.

>>11351742
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bem.22217 Almost seems to be saying it's good in some ways, am I just dumb? Can someone explain this for me?

>>11351940
Essentially like other studies the direction of effect was dependent on power density, the interesting part is its inverted, generally higher power density suppresses brain function immediately and lower acts as a stimulant before exhaustion. In line with other studies though, you have an increase in anxiety behaviors. The underlying cause of the change is definitely not positive, as indicated in other papers.

>>11351964
Ok, thank you, I think I get what you're saying, basically it puts a stress on the body that is harmful but in a small enough amount appears as a stimulant. It is strange how it's inverted, maybe the stimulation effect only kicks in at a certain threshold and if they'd've tested higher W/Kg there would be a reversal of the trend. I wonder how high the energy levels humans are exposed to will get, maybe it's safe now but there's gotta be a point where it won't be and that should be a serious concern of governments.

>>11351710
Friction

>>11351710
It's pressing against your leg, get looser pants if you don't want ingrown hairs
I had the same thing when I used to carry a big boxcutter at work

>>11351891
FYI the poster you're replying to is schizophrenic

>>11352150
>>11352151
I considered that but the effect seemed too pronounced for the slight extra pressure, maybe I just have poor judgement though

>>11352161
Are you crouching down, sitting, or balancing things on the top of your legs a lot?

>>11352151
In reference to the mental state of>>11351742
I'm kinda bothered by the way they act when trying to prove their point: "I don't know why I bother anymore, because no one can believe it, and they can't bother to check." Does seem like someone who might not be the most stable but I don't wanna be quick to judge or use ad hominem reasoning.

>>11352172
>Does seem like someone who might not be the most stable
There's a reason for that
https://pastebin.com/aYNv0zFc

>>11352172
It's just the natural course of adaptation to experience, I'm not sure what's so ambiguous about it, it's simple fatigue. Basically I've been researching for over 6 years now. I've presented to state senate committees, I've made threads on here and replied to people elsewhere, I've talked to people I've known for ten years to my entire life, I've talked to acquaintances. I have a packet full of hard data and summaries 3 inches thick, and even if you can get people to read a single sentence on one page. Nothing changes. The data is ignored.

Mediafire has download counters, which is part of why I use it. I stress to people how important this is, give a general overview of what's going on and how we got here, the effect it's having on whatever thing is relevant particularly their children and grandchildren,. Write down the link. Nothing. They never read it or download a single file.

I don't get much from talking about the effects of electromagnetic fields on biological systems generally. I use some (too much) time this way nonetheless because I recognize it's necessary and I have an obligation to inform others ,where they've indicated some interest and potential to benefit. There is nothing more important than one's health. And there's a much bigger picture here, as well. Meaningless terms, however, until you live it.

>>11352175
As far as this guy goes, he likes to post that pastebin often. Some of the posts are mine, some of them aren't. His accuracy isn't horrible, but it's not great either. I came back after several months and found some threads where he'd labeled other posters as "The" 5G schizo. I've been over his link in full prior, which naturally he would never include. He seems to trawl the archives, like any good story he establishes a hard skeleton, then he looks for posts to flesh it and weave together into a compelling narrative.

I usually just ignore him. I'd like to think the irony wouldn't be lost on most people.

>>11352091
Look up Bawin and Adey's Ca2+ efflux experiments, UCLA 1970's. Later replicated by Carl Blackman et al. It was windowed to certain modulation (peaking at 16Hz), but there were multiple ranges where this curve occurred. You may be right about these other pulsed frequencies having similar banding curves. Refer to the EHS/Microwave Sickness section for more on that. Interesting thought, hadn't considered it in quite that way. Pulse characteristics seem to be important here as well.

>>11351710
Really. Strange then you used a meaningless pic rather than an actual photo of what you allege.

>>11352161
You would be surprised how unnoticeable the rubbing needs to be to affect hair growth. My boots fit quite well and comfortably but I still have patches on my shins where the hair doesn’t grow either

>>11351710
Simple friction. I have that at all the places where I have something in my pocket. Also causes some ingrown hair.