[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 24 KB, 471x388, 1578859531473.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11311338 No.11311338[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Explain this to me.

The average IQ on the world is 100 (depends on race, yeah, whatever).

This means, there's 50% of humans with IQ higher than 100.
But I am 130 IQ, and therefore I'm just like 2 standart deviantions on top.
Acording to this, there should be the same amount of males with 130 IQ as there are with 70 IQ.

But It feels in practice like if the vast majority of people are under 100IQ, like 90% of all people are like 85-90 IQ or less (including whites).
It feels like if 125-130 IQ are like 1% of all population while 70 IQ are like 30% of the population.

I know the whole nigger shit with lower IQ.
But if the vast majority of people are niggers and non whites, then the average IQ of the planet should be like 75-80, don't you think.
Even if we make such 75-80 the 100 normal, then I should be like 140-150 IQ on REAL TERMS.

Explain that to me.
Acording to current shit, then there should be 3 billion people with IQ higher than 100, which I really doubt.

>> No.11311348

>>11311338
I'm assuming you're American. The interbreeding in your country has led to the average IQ being 75-80.

>> No.11311350

>>11311348
south america, not LOS UNIDOS.

>> No.11311362

>>11311338
>feels in practice like if the vast majority of people are under 100IQ

>Be me
>Be 130 IQ
>Don't know what IQ is or how it is calculated.
>Won't even google it.
>Ask stupid questions in 4chan

This is evidence that IQ is not a direct measure of intelligence.
'cos you're a moron.

>> No.11311382

ITT: OP's mad he doesn't have genius IQ and uses niggers as an excuse.

>> No.11311390

>>11311338
>But It feels in practice like if the vast majority of people are under 100IQ
The explanation is that your feeling is wrong

>> No.11311395

>>11311390
I live surrounded by low IQ brown mongrels IRL.

>> No.11311404

>>11311338
>The average IQ on the world is 100

no, average world IQ is closer to 90

>> No.11311408

>>11311395
Unless you've literally seen the results of their IQ tests, you're misunderstanding the word IQ.

>> No.11311419

>Acording to current shit, then there should be 3 billion people with IQ higher than 100, which I really doubt.
Why would you doubt that? Are you a moron? So you not understand standard distributions?

>> No.11311430

>>11311404
what have you normalised as 100? white western euros?

>> No.11311432

>>11311419
3/4 of the planet are india, africa, middle east and south america.
retard.

>> No.11311445
File: 36 KB, 634x414, 1408624676156_wps_5_World_IQ_g.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11311445

>>11311338
>The average IQ on the world is 100
kek, that's the average IQ of America and UK

>> No.11311454

>>11311445
.....anon by your logic you could normalize an abo at 100 and everyone would be 200+IQ?

>> No.11311455

IQ is just another inaccurate parameter among many who define success.

>> No.11311458

>>11311454
there is no logic average IQ is based off of the countries it came from not globally

>> No.11311459

Its easier to be stupid and ignorant than smart and knowledgeable, simple as that.

>> No.11311465

>>11311459
More like people use intelligence when it's necessary to survive and thrive rather than waste time thinking about autistic bullshit.

>> No.11311471

>>11311465
Intelligence provides survival oportunities for your offspring in humans, retard.

A really smart guy has better survival chances than a dumber one.

Also women prefer smarter partners.

>> No.11311477

>>11311471
>Intelligence provides survival oportunities for your offspring in humans, retard
True
>A really smart guy has better survival chances than a dumber one
Not true, only in dire circumstances
>Also women prefer smarter partners
kek

>> No.11311478

>>11311432
IQ is normally distributed with 100 defined to be its average. Retard.

>> No.11311482

>>11311478
Median

>> No.11311488

>>11311471
There is a point where intelligence becomes counterproductive to reproduction, case in point: /sci/

>> No.11311489

>>11311404
Shouldn't the IQ of the population you're using for reference be 100 by definition? How do you even calculate the average IQ of all human beings?

>> No.11311492

>>11311477
>Also women prefer smarter partners
>kek

You're either an incel or a retard. Can't decide which.

>> No.11311496

>>11311482
Median and mean and average are all the same fucking thing when we are talking about normal distributions, my mentally stunted friend.

>> No.11311498

>>11311492
>Also women prefer smarter partners
I need proofs

>> No.11311501

>>11311488
case in point: Reddit

>> No.11311505

>>11311498
>I need proofs

Find the literature. It's in the grasp of your hands, just google it.

>> No.11311507
File: 133 KB, 1050x1350, 1575354096870.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11311507

>>11311488
>/sci/
>smart
waste of hitler digits

>> No.11311513

>>11311505
So it's not true then

>> No.11311517

>>11311513
You're still an Incel, and we both know that's true :)

>> No.11311520

>>11311362
intelligence =/= knowledge
you fucking ignorant faggot

>> No.11311525

>>11311496
median doesn't mean the same thing on any distribution, you fucking retard

>> No.11311526

>>11311520
Intelligence is knowing how to use that knowledge efficiently

>> No.11311528

>>11311498
Turns out that women are interested in intelligence only to the degree that it is capable of creating economic results.

>> No.11311533

>>11311526
yes, it's the ability to process information
now kys faggit

>> No.11311536

>>11311525
which is why 100 IQ is defined as the MEAN holy shit how are you this dense

>> No.11311538

>>11311528
>Turns out that women are interested in intelligence only to the degree that it is capable of creating economic results
So you mean they care about wealth more than intelligence then?
>>11311533
the ability to process information isn't the same thing as the speed to process information

>> No.11311542

>>11311536
the mean of the US and UK

>> No.11311544

>>11311542
"No"

>> No.11311548

>>11311544
yes>>11311445

>> No.11311551

>>11311548
>refers me to something completely unrelated

>> No.11311553

>>11311536
>When current IQ tests were developed, the median raw score of the norming sample is defined as IQ 100 and scores each standard deviation (SD) up or down are defined as 15 IQ points greater or less
Consider suicide dear mongoloid

>> No.11311556

>>11311551
so the global IQ is 100 and America and UK have the same IQ as South Africa and India?

>> No.11311559

>>11311538
>the ability to process information isn't the same thing as the speed to process information
two aspects of the same thing

>> No.11311560

>>11311553
I'm in completely fucking awe. You do know that median and mean are the SAME THING, when talking about a standard distribution, right? Right? I've already established this.

>> No.11311563

>>11311559
Nope
Raw intelligence - the speed to process information
Crystallized intelligence - the ability to process more complex information which is more learned

>> No.11311567

>>11311538
>So you mean they care about wealth more than intelligence then?
Yes
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3689109-sex-differences-in-sexuality-among-medical-students-effects-of-increasing-socioeconomic-status/

>> No.11311573

>>11311567
So you say that women care more about intelligence since wealth is correlated with intelligence when women really only care about wealth?

>> No.11311582

>>11311538
>>11311567
>intelligence is not related to wealth

>> No.11311587

Imagine if you had in interest in science or math that wasn't centered around muh high score in le epic puzzle game.

>> No.11311588

>>11311582
It is but anon made it seem that women care about intelligence first before wealth

>> No.11311595

>>11311588
intelligence is a sexual turn on for a lot of women.
Is the major sexual attractiveness for like 20% of women.

>> No.11311596

>>11311587
Proof that Reddit is intellectually superior to 4chan because they actually talk about science and math there instead of just memes.

>> No.11311597

>>11311595
>20%
More like 10%, women prefer attractiveness, then they care about wealth, then they care about intelligence...

>> No.11311598

>>11311596
newfags will disgree with this post

>> No.11311603

>>11311597
t. autist that has never seen how wet dumber women comes hearing a smart guy talking

>> No.11311614

>>11311603
>t. autistic who lives in fantasy land and think women care about lanklet incels talking about differential equations and marvel movies

>> No.11311634

>>11311587
Sure, but i wish i could be better at understanding and memorizing information related to science.

>> No.11311651

>>11311603
where the fuck do you live anon?

>> No.11311667

>>11311573
They care about intelligence only to the degree that it helps to make moneyyyyy

>> No.11311681

>>11311563
To process complex information you need raw power which will also lead you to process simple info faster.
Think of it as the cpu.
And knowledge is the data memorized on you hdd.

>> No.11311704

>>11311478
By european standards, but other nations don't perform equally.

>> No.11311715

>>11311704
Specifically the US or UK. There are some European countries that have sub 90 IQ (Eastern Europe of course).

>> No.11311719

>>11311715
is that counting just the white whites?

>> No.11311745

>>11311715
but the average iq of us is 98

>> No.11311820

>>11311338
INT =/= WIS
There are plenty of 130's out there who waste their abilities on """politics,""" """economics,""" scientism, and making up excuses for themselves, because they lack the willpower and perspective to apply it effectively.

>> No.11311828
File: 118 KB, 657x527, 1577032049997.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11311828

>>11311338
>But It feels in practice like if the vast majority of people are under 100IQ,
This is probably because you come into contact with unrepresentative sample of population.
This true for most people. Except that they tend to socialize with people of similar cognitive ability as themselves so we can safely assume that your muh 130IQ is a lie.

Good job giving yourself away, brainlet.

>> No.11311832

>>11311715
>There are some European countries that have sub 90 IQ
No they fucking don't lol

>> No.11311847

>>11311828
>Except that they tend to socialize with people of similar cognitive ability
in a school or work environment yes, but anon is probably a shut in neet
also, sauce?

>> No.11311925

>>11311832
>what is Eastern Europe

>> No.11311940

>>11311925
Not a place with sub 90IQ

>It may be surprising that there does not appear to be much difference between IQs in the twelve former communist countries of Eastern Europe, among which the median IQ is 96, and the 14 countries of western Europe, among which the median is 98.5. The difference is small and not statistically significant, so it seems that although the former communist countries have had much lower living standards for some sixty years following the end of World War II, this has not impaired the intelligence of the populations.

https://lesacreduprintemps19.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/lynn-race-differences-in-intelligence.pdf

>> No.11311946

>>11311940
>lynn
dropped

>> No.11311951

>>11311946
Feel free to post any other scientist who thinks the IQ in EE is below 90.
Go on.

>> No.11311952

>>11311946
What is with all the hate against Lynn?

>> No.11311962

>>11311952
He estimated that African IQ is below 70 which made a lot of people very uncomfortable.
Also, in his early papers he referred to human races as "caucasoid, mongoloid and negroid" which left them absolutely furious lmao

>> No.11311968

>>11311962
but this is 4chan/nel?
non racists are in the minority

>> No.11311979

>>11311603
attractiveness/good genes for physical development and high status/wealth are all over 90% of women care about for mating. intelligence in and of itself is not selected for by women, otherwise higher IQ wouldn't be related to later in life virginity loss.

>> No.11311989

>>11311968
On 4channel as a whole maybe. But I wouldn't be so sure about /sci/
Also, a lot of people here just go against whatever /pol/ says by default and Lynn's IQ maps are quite popular there so you get the idea.

>> No.11312012
File: 97 KB, 800x820, sb.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11312012

>>11311989
so basically this