/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11299433
I DON'T FUCKING KNOW
I KEEP MAKING IN-TOPIC SHITPOSTING THREADS AND THEY KEEP FUCKING SLIDING DOWN THE HILL
IF IT ISN'T FUCKING IQ, /ADV/ OR WHATEVER SCHIZOPHRENIA OF THE WEEK NIGGAS REFUSE TO FUCKING POST
I'M NOT EVEN TRYING TO HAVE A DISCUSSION, NIGGAS CAN'T EVEN SHITPOST IN TOPIC

Am I asking for too much?

>>11299433
Sounds like you haven´t read the dialetics of enlightment

>>11299433
Every board has to go through it at some point.
If you think this is bad, you should have seen when /mlp/ was the most /x/ board.

years ago desu

>>11299495
this basically
Every board has its own weakness that it must go through to develop an immune system. This board's weakness is dunning-krugering schizos, /pol/'s weakness is gullibility and susceptibility to outside influences namely stormfront and Kushner's PR team, /biz/' is of paid shills pushing coins like chainlink. It may take some time but somewhere down the road it will eventually be free of them and would've evolved a permanent response to any future stressors of this nature, which is exactly the point of them in the first place and why you shouldn't try to censor them by forcing the mods to do so. By censoring them you're eliminating 4chan's natural advantage of evolving decentralized defenses against them and are merely turning it into a discount subreddit.

>>11301097
That’s not how an evolutionary arms race actual works though, most of the time one organism just wins and that’s it.

>>11299433
Because we come here when /x/ is slow.

>>11299452
>Am I asking for too much?
Apparently so.
>>11299433
>When
Since before I got here. Been a while.

>>11301459
if you`d all stay on /x/ then it would be faster

/sci/ is the least /sci/ board on 4chan

it wasn't this way 3 years ago though, this place has really gone to hell

>>11303083
All of the content on a user-generated content site like 4chan is created by the site's end users. Thats you. If anyone wants to complain about the quality of content on a user-generated content site like 4chan, then they only have themselves to blame.
If you liked /sci/ three years ago and you think that they board has turned to shit after three years of your participation then why are you so utterly certain that the reason for the board's perceived decline is other people's fault? maybe it was your participation that caused it, maybe we'd all be better off if you stopped trying to participate, you might even start to like the board again if you remove the one consistent factor in the decline that you've observed.
get some self awareness, level yourself up to being "too good for 4chan"

>>11303102

>>11299433
When people realized everything they were brainwashed with their entire lives was a lie and those that were smart, which apparently you aren't one of them, started looking for the truth and trying to help other people understand it. I know you love autistic hugboxes where everyone is a hive mind giving you consistent confirmation that you are right because you have all been brainwashed with the same lies but those days are gone so if you want to cry because of it prob better start your own cult so you can shield yourselves from new ideas/interpretations and truth

>>11303083
It's happened in the last few months, influx of pol/schizos.

>>11303083
Your "science" is a religion. You're just upset because you're getting data which doesn't agree with your overarching narrative of the world, your "world view",

Pic related, what they were working on from the late 50's.

>>11301097
except 4chan's caught the attention of russia and China as outlets to influence westerners. wu mao in particular has been posting like mad on /sci/ all month long. I'd link you some of their threads/posts but they get cleaned up by jannies pretty quick.

how is 4chan suppose to develop an immunity to state sponsored propaganda campaigns? Even if 4chan does, they can just change tactics, like troll the fuck of of this board and drive it into the ground forcing everyone into other forums where they have better control.

>>11303178
>except 4chan's caught the attention of russia and China as outlets to influence westerners
that's weird, from the excessive China gore spam on /pol/ and the obvious unnatural patriotism around the USA it somehow felt as if the direct opposite of what you're saying is happening and as if CIA agents were steering the discussion here. Now if only I had a proof through official documents that the CIA actually *did* post on the chans...

>>11299433
when they realized science is just cucks afraid of religion because if God exist these depraved fucks are going to hell.

>>11303186
I've long found the idea that I was informing a CIA agent that he was clamped, vaccinated, circumcised, fluoridated, brominated, chlorimated, irradiated, pitocin'd. vitamin K'd, fed toxic s oy forumula, etc, very amusing.

>>11304223
Like, imagine waking up the CIA from within. No doubt as part of the later part of entry they have some type of trauma based conditioning, but nonetheless, still possible.

>>11304223
>>11304228
they have brainwashing programs to specifically prevent this you retard.

>>11304331
Did you even read my second post you fucking clamp?

>>11304217
Enjoy being tortured forever in Tartarus, nonbeliever. Zeus is real and he is judging you.

>>11304424
Anu is the true God. Enki is the creator. Enlil is Satan and an asshole.

>>11303102
> If you liked /sci/ three years ago and you think that they board has turned to shit after three years of your participation then why are you so utterly certain that the reason for the board's perceived decline is other people's fault?

Because he’s one person out of tens of thousands you fucking retard

>>11303167
>Pic related, what they were working on from the late 50's.

The USSR actively pushed nonsense like that to spook the US, and your own image expresses strong skepticism. You’re literally retarded/

>>11304432
Wishful thinking, kiddo.

I've come to call this recent tendency the "complete mind fallacy", along with a similar but distinct trend, the "born yesterday fallacy".

The complete mind fallacy is the assumption that a speaker, or writer, has communicated the entirety of their mind in their statement. Every piece of information, any doubts, error control, matters considered along the way, all contained in what they've stated explicitly. This indicates a near obliteration of theory of mind, you're quite literally too lazy and dimwitted to see the person behind the work. You think because something isn't explicitly addressed, it isn't considered nor is it part of their mind. Because of this you make stupid claims and statements instead of having conversations or asking questions. Subhuman behavior.

The born yesterday fallacy can be concisely summed as the above, with the additional assumption that there are types that are pretty much off the assembly line. There is notion of a process, or genesis, of the individual.

I wanted to make it clear that you're a moron and an asshole, and lucky you're getting anything, before proceeding. As far as electromagnetic weapons goes, there really wasn't much in the way of shell games between the US and USSR. It was suspected by many at the time that they were trying to spook us, sow discomfort in the citizenry, and to cripple our military and industrial capability. The USSR had the first safety standard for RF exposure in the general population, and it was 1000x lower than what was believed to be safe in the west. So there were considerations of whether this was also a front they paid lip service to, while imposing only selective military and industrial restrictions. Now that it's 50 years later, we know this was largely false. The sheer mass of research produced in the USSR reflected genuine interest, and their findings were replicated at the time, and have now been replicated quite generally internationally.

>>11304462
Let's be real, you're not going to read any further though. After this exchange (which was a complete waste of even the trivial amount of time and effort invested) that'll be that and you'll go on to meet whatever fate awaits.

Regardless, you or anyone else, refer to this for more.
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/dj875cd10yb72/EMF

>>11304462
>Crying with no evidence

Cite a peer-reviewed paper or fuck off baby

>>11304470

>>11304465
Here, have upwards of 10,000 over the last century.