/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11281409
Why are incels and /pol/tards so obsessed with inbreeding?
Trying to investigate your roots?

>>11281409
They are not mutually exclusive. An old repost of mine:

AAAbb/AAAbb is the "purebred" first race. (capital leters signify advantageous genes)
aaaBB/aaaBB is the "purebred" second race.

Their first generation offspring is all AAAbb/aaaBB

The second generation (grand children) with two AAAbb/aaaBB parents get 50% chance PER GENE:

aaabb/aaabb (stupid)
aaabB
aaaBb
aaaBB
aaAbb
aaAbB
...

AAAbb
AAAbB
AAABb
AAABB/AAABB (genius not seen before the mixing)

All the combinations like AaAbB/aaABb can occur, too many to list them all.

Basically, when you mix two separate populations, you get some individuals who are exceptionally bad and some who are exceptionally good. The variability increases because of how genetics works, even though it would intuitively seem to many people it should create populations that are more uniform, the opposite is what actually happen.

The Virgin Eurasian

The Chad European

>>11281470
Why does inbreeding create defects if you are just shuffling around only a small set of genes?

>>11281500
Inbreeding doesn't cause, it only makes them show up.
Let's say you have a gene, with 2% of which is a bad recessive allele that causes a severe genetic disease.
Since you have two copies of each gene, there is a relatively high, nearly 4% probability that you carry the defective allele, but only a minuscule 0.04% risk that you actually get the disease it causes.
This means there can be a relatively high frequency of bad genes in a seemingly rather healthy population.
But if you fuck your sibling, this changes, since half of the genes you have is shared, so the risk of getting two copies of a bad recessive allele dramatically increases.

>>11281500
Inbreeding doesn't cause them, it only makes them show up.
Let's say you have a gene, with 2% of which is a bad recessive allele that causes a severe genetic disease.
Since you have two copies of each gene, there is a relatively high, nearly 4% probability that you carry the defective allele, but only a minuscule 0.04% risk that you actually get the disease it causes.
This means there can be a relatively high frequency of bad genes in a seemingly rather healthy population.
But if you fuck your sibling, this changes, since half of the genes you have is shared, so the risk of getting two copies of a bad recessive allele dramatically increases.

>>11281476
>>11281477
The virgin cherrypick
>>11281470
>>11281531
The chad scientific explanation

>>11281476
>>11281477
>>11281671
The dead reddit meme

>>11281671
>The theoretically desirable trait is chad while the pragmatically superior strategy is virgin
That's the wrong interpretation of the meme.
t. virgin

>>11281409
Conan O'Brien is also inbred.

>>11281812
Why are you spamming vidya scenery in all threads?

>>11281839
it's entertaining why the fuck else

>>11281841
autism?

>>11281847
lol prolly

>>11281409
Americans aren't European.

>>11281839
based pixelart gif poster is doing gods work. You don't like, keep going, you like, you right click save. Adds flavour to the thread.
>>11281841
Thank you.

>>11282418
Go to r/PixelArt for this shit then, retard.

>>11281409
Fuck off with this /pol shit

> but does the same hold true for the notion of outbreeding depression

Literally no such thing in humans

>>11282445
>Literally no such thing in humans
Well then, that sure was persuasive.

>>11282433

>>11282690
>Well then, that sure was persuasive.

Thanks.

>>11282433
also, here's another just because your a whiny little faggot LOL

>>11282418
you're welcome /b/ro

>>11282433
>r/
Fuck off redditor.

>>11282445
>>11282690
>>11282693