/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11278292

The existence of God is independent of ZFC set theory. Mathematician Marcus Aurelius instead proved the following lemma as the closest thing:

"Since it is possible that thou mayest depart from life this very moment, regulate every act and thought accordingly. But to go away from among men, if there are gods, is not a thing to be afraid of, for the gods will not involve thee in evil; but if indeed they do not exist, or if they have no concern about human affairs, what is it to me to live in a universe devoid of gods or devoid of Providence? But in truth they do exist, and they do care for human things, and they have put all the means in man's power to enable him not to fall into real evils. And as to the rest, if there was anything evil, they would have provided for this also, that it should be altogether in a man's power not to fall into it..."

By being [math] \mathbb{Q}[/math]

>>11278297
Queer

>>11278297
how do i Q

>>11278297
How can God be [math]\mathbb{Q}[/math] if he's not [math\mathbb\{R}[/math]?

>>11278292
I fucking wish every one of you retarded highschool posters with your retarded humour would be forced to upload your retarded shit-eating faces next to your posts.

>>11278292
One does not prove God. The burden of proof is on the claimant. God was the original claimant. Therefore, it is His own duty to prove His existence to each and every one of us.

>>11278303
You're supposing the existence of [math]\mathbb{R}[/math], which is unnecessary and in fact harmful for your faith.
The real numbers are a lie invented by Satan to deceive mankind.

>>11278609
OK Zuckerberg

>>11278292

>>11280604
I. R. Sneaky. Baboon.
>Signed ~Always-Always, PayMeOnlyInOrWithMemeMagic~

Does victory dance without pants!

>>11278292
"Imaginary" is a regretted misnomer.

>>11280608
Instantiated OR 實例化 is the correct term if anyone actually cares, as in a computational instance.