/sci/ - Science & Math

Was Michael Mosley related to that Oswald Mosley guy or is the name a coincidence?

https://gbit.cognitron.co.uk/account/consent?next=/ex/task/rs_blocks

>>11270089
A bit disappointed, tired non-native though

Umm yeah the emotions part made me quit.

is it measuring based on time or correct answers or both??

My digit span result is on the floor I couldn't get past 6, same with the grid, I must be quite tired...

why are americans obsessed with bbc?

>>11270089

I guess I'm a typical adhd autist.

the tower of hanoi planning just completely killed me, like my brain melted on that part, i didnt know what was happening
is there anything i can do not to struggle with these types of tasks?
also i think this test is heavily culturally biased

some of those faces were ugly

>>11270238
i think they are computer generated to be honest

>>11270238
All my wrong answers on that one were because one of the faces couldn't quite keep a straight face and was repressing a smile, but the test still considered them to have the same expression

>>11270244
yeah I only got 39 on that one I wasn't sure how large a difference in emotion the machine was considering race might have made some difference

Spatial intelligence should be high. I've done first task without mistakes, but mistyped backspace in second task.
t. female (female) non-native (b1)

Maybe I should do this again when I don't feel completely drained my results are all over the place, it's kind of weird what I did well in.
male, native, 30s

I think a lot of these tasks are faster to complete on a tablet than with a touchpad or mouse which might skew their results somewhat

>>11270089

I didn't bother to screengrab mine but this is a fair representation of what it looked like. The fairly weak "planning" was interesting since I've previously worked as a scheduler.

The inner object represents the "average" nonagon.

am i retarded? i scored 124 on the mensa internet test. though i didnt really bother thinking with tower of london

why are spatial scores coming up so low?

As others I'm sleepy and tired. Don't know why I bothered. Maybe I'll try to max out this gayass test tomorrow.

Interesting though if I'm really that bad at language stuff since I'm interested in languages and that gives support to my theory that people are interested in stuff they suck at. Like someone who enjoys cooking for example must really suck at basic things to feel sufficiently challenged and hence derive pleasure from something mundane.

>>11270323
>I didn't bother to screengrab mine
nope, but you bothered to make a drawing that probably took up more time

>>11270362

I was busy and closed the window. Once I had a few minutes, I made the pic. Oh well. More evidence for the relatively poor (but still "above average" planning.

>>11270335
I caught backspace once or twice which might have reset something

wtf are these faces and how are they the same exact emotion

>>11270089
I notice most anons in the thread scored very well on the mental rotation. wonder why that is

>>11270392
they can rotate their minds

>>11270392
>>11270182
this anon and I have very similar scores

>>11270396
how would Terry do?

>>11270392

Surprised my attention scored so low.

>>11270392
The mental rotation part was pretty easy. There weren’t ever any curveballs like same geometry and different colors or anything. I wonder if it’s actually a running average from incoming results or just guesses at averages.

>>11270430
Phoneposting is hard bros.

In school I always did better with language arts subjects.

>>11270430
same it was easy just pick up the pattern like one red in a corner or two browns next to eatchother

I am a bit drunk but it seems reasonable

>>11270332
You're in top 5 percentiles in some of these. maybe you're a savant..

> All of these people being below average in multiple categories

Damn who'd have thought I'd be the superior all rounder... see you never ever brainlets LMAO

>>11270089
haha lol im autistic

The emotional discrimination was bullshit because the people were obviously acting, acting like shit I might add.
Also discriminating the emotions of blacks was a lot harder than whites, because I never encounter them in my daily life. Also it's harder to notice wrinkles on them.

>>11270332
>>11270306
>>11270303
>>11270089
autism

>>11270456
cope I was top %30 and i'm fucking autistic

>>11270392

you don't need to rotate anything. I was shown a grid with a blue square in one corner and all but one rotated image had a blue square in the corner. just check the patterns in the image instead of trying to manipulate it.

>>11270460
the autistic pac-man pattern once more

Fuck digit span i cant concentrate to save my life

The Verbal reasoning thing kept pissing me off.

3:30am, non-native and other assorted excuses
I'm usually not that shit at languages
Also those faces are horrendous

>>11270474

Are most bongs this ugly?

>>11270490
they selected the most photogenic bongs for the sake of improving international relations... you're looking at top ten percent britons LMAO

>>11270462
It's not my fault brits are so damned ugly that their expressions cannot be discerned.

>>11270496
Yeah this is Barry Daws>>11270480
He's the second best paid model in blighty.

>>11270392

Because it's easy as fuck-for young males who have grown up with video games. Men can do that. You just pick out the 2-3 bits and their relation to each other and go "oh yeah, only that one makes sense."

I reckon the other element is that you can "see" it all at once. Not so, the Simon-esque number-rattling and square-rattling. If I get a food pellet as a reward, then I'm incentivized to short-term instant recall random strings of 0-9. But I'm not (in this case), so nah. Those two areas of the game were where I got most bored and cared the least, tbqh.

Also, as on the SAT I took years ago, the verbal comparision test contained items which were in fact incorrect. But using one example which was "incorrect" according to the test (but which wasn't), I gamed things a bit on a related follow-up, reasoning that the test would make the same basic mistake (it did), which I used to improve my score slightly.

It seems like just about everyone in this thread is in the top 5-10% for mental rotation... really makes you think

>>11270536
think what? I don't get it

>>11270378
The emotion is rape

Checking in with what I'm calling the autistic cock and balls pattern

Lol easy

Top 5% in three categories so I'll take that

>>11270551
>Not getting more than 100%
tsk tsk

>>11270365
>Enough time to take a 15 minute test
>Too busy to press print-screen

What does this say about me?

>>11270568

Timing and priorities. I was passing time in leisure and had other things which took precedence. Also see above.

It looks like a peanut.

>>11270564
>>11270586

>>11270536

We're all male and it's one of the easier, objective parts of the test (parts of the verbal comparision test have incorrect answers as I've indicated). Even the trannies here are male.

>>11270551

Photoshop retard alert

Looks like I'm just a smol brain.

Also, do you think they're collecting racial profiling data on that "emotional discrimination" section? I feel like I did better when subjects were the same race (which probably says more about me than anything...)

Last, wtf was with all that data collection BS at the end? I'm not giving the BBC shit about how often I feel lonely, drink coffee, etc.

>>11270596
No wonder you scored so low on the Attention section. That pixel was there because the "Spatial" part of Spatial Intelligence was out of view, dumbass. Here's the fixed version for your retarded ass.

>>11270454
How can you be autistic and in the 90th percentile for emotional discrimination?

>>11270549
It looks more like a helmet.

>>11270089
>looks like a figure '8'
>ADHD kind of spergy
>bottom 50% tower of london and emotional recognition
>40% on everything but language and spatial rotation which means fuck all as a native english speaker

Interesting, I do have to train my brain to do spacial tasks significantly more than linguistic ones.

>>11270603
"No wonder you scored so low on the Attention section" Are you implying that even tho im anonymously posting, you somehow know what I scored? You truly are a genius.

>>11270648
Nice job dodging the main point lol. It's easy to infer based off of you missing such an obvious detail. Go back to eating crayons, brainlet.

Am I dumb?

A-at least I'm well rounded, right?

Did anyone else kinda started flowing in the attention one? I was really slow at first, but towards the end the whole thing just became much easier. It was a little weird.

>>11270666
All you can do is rotate. The twenty year old rotatoor.

>>11270536
Except me. I was top 40%

>>11270689
Always spinning into the top 20% I guess.

Top 10% in focusing and spatial intelligence. Fun fact is that I'm a female and hurt myself by bump into things daily.

>>11270332
It's buzzfeed tier test don't take it seriously

>>11270713
lmao, who needs Verbal working memory? The most cucked of all intelligences.

This was brought to you by the high spacial gang.

>>11270089
yikes
a lot of those verbal reasoning ones did not really feel correct or needed a bit of a stretch to feel correct
but fair enough I guess

>>11270701
>>11270689
Deja vu

>>11270089
get on my level brainlets, ( i'm an actual autist apparently), I didn't read the instructions to the towers of hanoi and I thought the orginal rules applied, I also counted badly two times to try to compensate for the lack of speed on my first two once I figured out the correct rules.

>>11270758
>I didn't read the instructions to the towers of hanoi and I thought the orginal rules applied, I also counted badly two times to try to compensate for the lack of speed on my first two once I figured out the correct rules
on second thought that kinda does show I don't have the best planning skills, so maybe it's not that accurate.
Also wtf I literally couldn't understand nigger facial expressions, it just tripped my head out.

I kept on misclicking shit on my phone. Also those faces were retarded

>>11270758
Not to increase my blog post but I didn't even get what we were supposed to do in the first block one, I just randomly pressed the first just to get an idea of what was right and what was wrong.

On another note, are we supposed to continue to train these to see if we can get better and justify the whole point of the latter part of the study (the part where they asked you about brain training and whether we believed intelligence was static)?

>>11270769
Edward Witten is that you?

>>11270683
it got worse as mine went on, I just wanted the damn thing to end, I thought it would be easier

>>11270772
>are we supposed to continue to train these
if you want to
it reminds me a bit of the cambridge brain sciences one from the early 2010s
but that one had neater design and was less clunky to use

>tfw I kept mixing up white and grey in the blocks one

Sorry anon I got frustrated and gave up

>>11270536
whoever planned that part of the test is an idiot. you don't even need to rotate, you just need to identify the specific block pattern because they didn't put in any "nearly correct" wrong answers in 9/10 of them.

>>11270564
Brother!
(here's mine)
>>11270758

hahahaha

Guys is there anything I can do to increase my ability to be attentive, I feel like i could have done better, then agian maybe the coomer meme is real, I masturbate 3 times a day and only sleep 6 hours

>>11270767
nah I had trouble too, that part of the test was fucky
some white guy had a smug smirk while a nigger was just smiling happily but they werent "different"
one nigress was horrified with eyebrows raised while some over the hill becky had a shocked look, one east african was looking pensive while the nigger next to him looked like he was "finna" to do something

>wine is to drink like oak is to tree

>>11270803
drink as in drinkable I assume

Yes

>>11270089
>tfw autistic
>tfw also a brainlet
i thought i was supposed to have super powers

>>11270089
im retarded and barely speak any english. i guess verbal part could be improved by engaging more in english media. i dont care about emotional bullshit. what about working memory? can i do something about it?

I got distracted too many times during the test and I have no patience whatsoever.
I hate my autism ;(.

My test result makes me feel retarded.

>>11270954
>My test result
Results*

>>11270089
Male,15 non native and a big retard after this test. Well i guess i really need training

>>11270986
Also at the face thing i didn't read what i'm supposed to do and i put different in all the photos black and white man/woman so i guess i'm racist too,not just a retard

>>11270089
just as a warning this will be used for targeted advertising, social engineering and to sell shit brain training apps in the near future.

>>11270089
Like most "tests" involving non STEM subjects this was retarded. I am rather drunk but time factor was a problem for me, I assumed I should do it as quickly as possible. So I fucked up a few questions answering before double checking.
The verbal working memory one would have been so much easier if I had a string of numbers instead of numbers flashed at me, the timing of the flashes fucks up my ability to internally divide the numbers into blocks, 123,456 or 1234, 5678, 98 ect.
I wonder how the spacial span test grading works? I'm sure I got 6 or 7 out of N on the harder tests but whatever
I fucked up verbal analogy by going too fast, I thought I'd get more points for going faster.
The verbal comprehension one was fucked, I had to deduce the answer for a few of them. They were using a fair number of obscure words.

But by far the worst was the emotional intelligence test, that was just retarded. Getting us to guess what emotions people are faking for a picture is not the same as recognizing emotions. One face had an open mouth while the other didn't, another pair one one clearly had their outer eyebrows going down while the other had them level. The faces were pictured from different angles, some above and some below horizontal. A much better test would have had people filmed while they react to short clips so as the emotions were genuine and it would let us see how there face changed. Plus ugly "diverse" people.

I'm thinking they'll publish a study soon highlighting englands lack of "emotional intelligence " and why we all need re-education.

Oh no!

>>11271037
You have just enough intelligence there to post innane posts on /sci/.

>>11270991
Heed this mans warning

>>11271008
Also on the verbal comprehension, "hinky" I looked it up and it's obscure 50's slang Why the fuck would anyone even want to know that?

>>11271008
I also did this one and it's worse, gay ass 0-4 leading questions. Standard psychology bullshit

>>11270991
this wont, but your 4chan posts and instant chat messages (discord et al.) certainly will
nothing in these tests is useful for advertising

>>11271008
Yeah, fuck the reading test. I noticed I did better when doing a similar test where I could see the whole sequence as well. I guess they did it this way though to see if you could do it with a fragmented, unpredictable sequence, like when you have to take note of a sequence without prep time or warning.
I think the verbal comprehension one has supposed to be guessed. I'm not a native speaker, but it still felt to me like you weren't supposed to actually know those words, just guess their meaning by things like sound, whether it's verb or noun-like, elimination by the ones you already answered/knew were something else, and the ones you actually knew were like "hints". Else it just becomes a "can you read these 4 paragraphs fast enough?" test.
And come on, the emotions one was literally just reading facial elements and seeing if they matched on a slightly different face. You didn't have to guess which emotion it was, just see if they shared the same elements. It counts in the sense that actual emotional reading is just that, but on a far greater scale (since people also fake them and you have to read a lot of inputs to correctly get it all the time). And the diversity is probably meant to avoid people giving them shit - you're more likely to get right the faces of people who you live around, and if they were all white they'd be "discriminating against people of color", and since they'd be getting worse scores the shitstorm would be even worse.
I just realized time matters only in some test, and I could have done better in the ones where it didn't. Still kinda fun to just try and speed run it though.

Non native english speaker 30 years old boomer here.

>>11271008
>the timing of the flashes fucks up my ability to internally divide the numbers into blocks
that is literally the point

>>11271115
How and why? My point is that these test are very inadequate approximations of the skills they are testing for. when would I ever have to remember a string of digits presented the way they were, compared to a phone number or any string of numbers. In the real world you have time to memorize, what made up kind of "intelligence" is that testing?

>>11271171
it is similar to the same section in WAIS
you get read a sequence of numbers and have to repeat them back, potentially in reverse order.

>>11270089

What the hell am I a retard? Bad way to find out.

>>11271178
At least you're a retard with high attention.

>>11271084
The verbal comprehension one was just stupid, it was full of trick questions. Not exactly tricks but what normal person knows about wainscoting or a specific 50's slang term? I know wainscoting from work but it was just poorly designed.
The emotions one as I said was the worst. It was the most poorly designed test of the skills they were testing. Emotional reading is NOT just that, context is so important. The people who make these tests and do these studies really have very little idea what they are doing. It really is
SAD!
and it's also
WRONG!

>>11271176
You didn't argue against my point.

>WAIS
>Wechsler was a very influential advocate for the concept of non-intellective factors
>non-intellective factors are variables that contribute to the overall score in intelligence, but are not made up of intelligence-related items
>Wechsler was born in a Jewish family in Lespezi, Romania

Pure coincidence.

>>11271193
but memorizing phone numbers is totally the ultimate le I am so smart-benchmark

>>11271206
How does short term memorizing a string of random numbers relate to my verbal working memory, a phone number makes sense and that's why I said it. If its spoken or read as multiple discrete sequences or if i see the whole number and separate it into different parts that is verbal working memory. As opposed to trying to juggle numbers into discrete sets while trying to remember how many there should be in the super set based on remembering the last super set of numbers then grouping these numbers into a logical group of sets then trying to remember the verbal representation of those numbers in the correct order.

It's fucking stupid and verbal working memory has nothing to do with numbers you stupid faggot who has still not addressed my point. However you've tried to respond to >>11271171
with mockery and a stupid cat cartoon by responding to >>11271193
Fight me faggot

Ok seemed to be about what i expected but i kinda think i bothced the spatial inteligence one

time to rename the board to /rotate/

I vote for /spin/

19yo br grill here.

I took the test again today, last night I did it at 2 am, capacity of concentration yesterday was top 10%. Today I was doing others things and this section got lower.

Mental rotation top 5%
Concentration 10%
Spatial inteligence 10%
The rest was 20% (last night, except the ones that was about english words.)

>>11270906
Verbal working memory could be improved by learning other language, could python e similares things. Don't need to be "native"/oral languages.

>>11271178
Maybe, but those areas could be improved by practicing.

>>11270775
the BBC went hard diversity with their hiring policies and shot themselves in the head cognitively

>>11271047
since this is a british test it's even weirder because it's american slang

>>11271181
and the bbc will use this to claim they did reputable "science"....

>>11271271
the number and spatial recall tests are probably the two most relevant tests in this study they're purer and less open to abuse to poor test construction, but they should have used a reverse digit span test as well to get a better idea of working memory.

I guess im DUMB ?

>>11270454
>>11270438
>>11270433
>>11270392
>>11270342
>>11270332
>>11270231
>>11270118
>>11270089
>>11270473
>>11270474
>>11270549
>>11270579
>>11270666
>>11270713
>>11270842
>>11270954
>>11271093
>>11271278
>>11271436
>these verbal reasoning scores
That's why you're stuck in a lab while the world is being ran by Lawyers, Marketers and Economists. These results are too real.

i kept fucking up the spatial intelligence one
and in towers of hanoi i thought you were trying to get from the bottom state to the top state

>>11271449
At least they can be slaves to their high-verbal jew overlords, everybody has at least one use.

was going into a STEM-type study a good idea lads? my strenghts have always been reading comprehension and other verbal shit (i could read when i was 3) i think i shouldve gotten into some lawyer/economist type shit

>>11270480
>>11270378
Who wants to try figuring out what their classification for expressions amounted to?
neutral
happy
scared

>>11271489
What in STEM? Anyway that seems pretty all rounded

Those fucking faces, man. Can't wait for the Brits to gtfo if that's how they normally look.

Also, my memory is fucked apparently.

>>11271526
resist diversification

>>11271489
Computer Science. Tower of Hanoi is a pretty good indicator of how adept of a programmer you could be.

>>11270089
>>11270303
>>11270306
>>11270332
>>11270418
>>11270438
>>11270460
>>11270474
>>11270549
>>11270564
>>11270579
>>11270643
>>11270666
>>11270748
>>11270758
>>11270786
>>11270954
>>11271008
>>11271178
i'm gonna say the a word

>>11271548
Lol nah, the absolutely worst code is written Tower of Hanoi-style, with small incremental copy pasted steps. Being a good programmer takes creativity and good taste.
>t. Terry

>>11271565
i straight up think i might be retarded

I thought my score of remembering 9 digits would be below average but apparently its higher than 95% of people here and I'm pretty sure I could go for 12 but I was half asleep doing the test
can you guys really not memorize 9 digits?

>>11271587
>Being a good programmer takes creativity and good taste.
Nah, are you dense enough to think that you're actually supposed to write the code in the exact same way as the tower of hanoi? Planning is the main skill needed for programming, you can write the most creative looking code ever, but if you never planned and wrote it spaghetti style, it'll be shit nonetheless.

is there any way to increase the same skills that planning is measuring in this test? i think this is my biggest handicap in life

>>11271620
Anon I want you to look up two tests called digit span and reverse digit span
the test should flash an increasing sequence digits at you, you then have to input them the correct sequence (or in reverse for the second test)
then tell us your score for both of these

Alternatively give me ten minutes to find a good version.

>>11270769
Nearly identical to mine. Also misclicked a bunch of times on the faces and verbal reasoning.

>>11271623
Nigger good code consists of a lot of tiny functions that solve one specific problem each and that can be re-aligned infinitely. Over planning is one of the most common pitfalls for subpar programmers, and it sucks when programmers like you leave their autistically planned mess that you then have to deal with. I'm not saying you shouldn't plan the code, but only on a very conceptual and interface-level.

>>11271608
retarded you are, but at least you are not an a word

>>11271638
https://www.memorylosstest.com/digit-span/
I did this one, I can do it almost equally well in both forward and reverse, reverse is slightly harder

>>11271638
>>11271620
OK try this one
https://www.memorylosstest.com/free-working-memory-tests-online/
Click on "new test" to start the test, memorise the numbers that flash up and input the sequence using their number pad
to change the difficulty click the counter below "span" to set the length

to do the reverse test click on the "forward" button in the bottom right.

>>11271518
there is no real STEM in my country but in my countrys high school you have to pick a group of classes to attend to and i picked the chemistry, biology etc. type classes
>inb4 underage
i had to redo a class because i commited attendance fraud

>>11271675
Yeah I just did that >>11271674
Unfortunately it says digit span cant be larger than 10 so I can't push it further on this site

>>11271682
ah I see
what was your reverse score? did you try the faster flash?

>>11271682
if you can find a longer test I'd be fascinated to hear how far you can push your short term and working memory

>>11271686
I did 10 for both forward and backward with no issues, I failed the reverse one once because I spaced out while looking at the digits
>did you try the faster flash?
I'm trying the fast one now and it does seem a lot harder, I can get 10 in ~30% of tries in reverse and ~50% in forward
>>11271693
could you tell me why that's interesting to you?

>>11271701
not a great implementation but it allows you to customise the length, scroll down for the test settings.
https://timodenk.com/blog/digit-span-test-online-tool/
Because you're scoring above average for working memory.

>>11271693
>>11271682
just shit one out in any programming language in a few minutes?

>>11271714
I got to 11 effortlessly both forward and reverse with the default delay of 1s between digits
at 12 I'm starting to struggle a bit and I'm getting it right ~60% of the time in forward and ~40% in reverse, for some reason my mind is becoming blank when I'm trying to recall them as if I hadn't been memorizing anything
I got 13 right only once forward out of 15 tries

>>11271726
I never learned to code...

>>11270089
what did my brain mean by this?

am I fucked bros?

>>11271679
India?

guysssss how do i improve planninggg

>>11271838

Here's something. Did this with phone so few miss taps here and there.

>>11271748
go northwest

>>11271899
anon this is way too many steps for someone who doesnt know how to plan you fucking retard.

>>11271985
I think the attention one is way easier on a tablet or phone...

>>11271985
this guy is like huh? when people look at or speak to him

well frens, I think I autism

I swear some of those verbal analogy questions were wrong. Pipe is a type of organ dammit.

>>11272097
The whole test is a shitshow.
I'm very sceptical of the results they will compile from this.
considering their budget they could have compiled something much more informative

>>11272073
Greetings brother

>low tier
The pac-man of autism.
>high tier
The arrowhead of successful grant applications.

Seems accurate enough given that I'm absolute dogshit at remembering people's names and sorting through information quickly. And the verbal reasoning part was easy, I don't know what you guys were going on about. Everything was either "A is a subset of B", "A is synonymous to B" or "A is opposite to B", and I say this as an ESL-pleb.

>>11272316
still gonna get played with that low attention bruh

>>11272329

am i retarded? (English isn't my native language)

>>11272572
don't worry, spatial intelligence and attention are the most important ones

>>11272644
like ur mom when she SUCKS MY COCK

I fucking hate verbal reasoning.

Interesting...

TBF I did this when I was tired, and I imagine the norms are really fucked up.

For context, I achieved ~ top 5%+ nationwide in my end of school exams.

It's 5 AM here

>be me
>ESL
>too lazy to read anything, both the descriptions or exercises with text
>somehow do well in the vocabulary thing
lmao I love being a tard

tfw short attention span and social autist

>>11270551
Care to post some of your individual results?

non-native here, am i autistic?

>>11271008
>any test I dont 100% is fucking stupid
t. narcisstic personality disorder

>>11272941
thats almost spot on what mine looks like

>>11271427
its multiple choice
you should be able to guess through the proccess of elimination, which makes it a bullshit cultural test since everyone who isnt a native speaker is going to crash hard on the test

>>11270089

I'm quite sure I answered the emotional one correctly

I was hoping for bonus points from being near-sighted, depressed and sleep deprived.

>>11273387
Wait I just noticed the blocks thing was completely 0. I definitely answered some of those correctly. Fuck it I'm not doing it again today.

>>11270089
I was always told i was smart, but after looking at this thread, I guess Im just painfully above average

>>11273487
There goes my dream of being an engie, I've always been good at reading and decent at writing but I’ve never been a quick thinker. Humanities never though, I'd rather die in STEM.

>>11273501
>quick thinker.
Meme.

>>11273487
>literally the shape of wisconsin
>>11273387
>the shape of michigan

>>11273045
thicc

>>11273545
hmm, i am not sure why that 1 section got such a bad score
but i earned a star trek logo

what part was the verbal reasoning part? word definitions?

>>11272316
but i got like 7 out of 10 of them right and it ranked me nillch

the hardest one for me was the digit span test. I could only remember 7 at a time. Also i missed 2 questions on the emotional discrimination test and only scored in the top 20% wtf

>>11273732
and i forgot the image

also the mental rotation one was too easy because all you had to do was pick 2 or 3 blocks and see if any of the 4 answers had the same pattern didnt have to rotate shit

>>11273697
It was trying to talk to a girl.

>>11273697
grass is to nature
what car is to vehicle

those were some ugly people
2 misclicks from stupid mouse
I disagreed with a couple word association questions too
let me know if you need more excuses

>>11273732
same here, I can remember sequences of 7 all day long but go to 8 and I crash and burn

>>11273760
Ive permanently remembered cheatcodes longer than 12 but I could barely get by 6 on that test

Well fuck

Also I guessed quite a few of the words, I'm not a native english speaker

I skipped spatial intelligence, planning, verbal reasoning, attention, addition, emotional discrimination and a good bit of the others because I'm half asleep
Pretty sure I fell asleep in one part of the test but woke up quick enough to not completely fail it.
Incase this isn't dead tomorrow I suppose I'll retake it and see what happens

>>11275519
Forgot to mention, not a native speaker of English.
Also got distracted because I've been thinking about the song Mr. Roboto for 10+ hours very vividly so it's like having the song blasted in my ears

>>11270089
Thanks for making me feel better about my mediocre ass working memory

Those numbers fucked me up, guess I'm retarded

>>11270089
lol im retarded

Gonna take my ADD medication tomorrow and see how much of a difference it makes.

am i retarted?

i didnt do great but i dont care just a gay test, gloria gaynor is making me feel better.

kek

is this autism?

>>11270089
I was trash at the pattern and number memorising, this test was actually quite fun and game-like

Native speaker and sperg

Non-native speaker.
Pretty pleased with myself

I'm blaming those ugly brits for this score

>>11270089
Fellow spacial autist wizard coming through.

What's up with me anons ? Non-native

>>11276455

Noticing a real trend in the strengths and weaknesses of this board. Really makes you think.

You niggers really sat down and did this? how much fucking free time you have I gave up on question 3 it was boring as fuck

>>11276590
I wasn't expecting this to be so fucking long but did it anyway, sunk cost fallacy

>Another IQ thread

>>11270089
Guess this is why I went for humanities.

>>11276569
Not surprising that /sci/ is full of people who have good spatial intelligence but poor face recognition. A bit surprised people aren't so great at planning. I've often thought it would be a good idea to have a 'group test' function for these psychology quizes, the Big Five, MBTI and IQ, so you could just drop a link on a forum and then collect the data without having to rely on people reporting back. Maybe it's already been done.

>>11270089
Just finished a 28h call shift on oncology
My brain is fried

>>11275519
Here are some of the results when I'm not sleep deprived.
I'm not quite sure how I got the type of test I did last time with more criteria, but it was boring and I skipped most of it anyway so I'm not gonna redo it.

>>11270089
Verbally retarded

>>11270105
no youre thinking of max mosley

>>11276697
>28h
24hours?

Did it last night on my phone in bed but didn't screenshot it, did a lot worse in attention this time.
>inb4 autistic
also skipped emotional I scored low in it anyway

>>11276503
Second attempt, I think this is all just an excuse to get personal info bros

>>11276601
lol

>>11270089
anyone with a high verbal reasoning is obviously a edgy teen that took this multiple times to max their score

>>11270392
autism
seriously, if you're wondering why it should even be hard, you are very likely autistic.
>>11271181
If you need "context" to read people, you're making it up
>>11271271
>>11271435

they definitely should use words and audio, in order to keep it in line with their description.

>>11277160
The verbal reasoning test is bullshit. No idea what it's supposed to measure or how is it related to anything except your vocabulary.

Is it just me or the emotional differences were rigged with bullshit?
I may be a little tired at this hour but I got several that were clearly not what the test was thinking they were.

>>11277252
Vocabulary is pretty closely correlated to IQ, at least for native speakers. The 10 question 'wordsum test' is used all the time as a quick and dirty cognitive score.

>>11277160
No, verbal reasoning is used to determine your abstract connections between certain things.
Abstract patterns, that's a pretty good indicator of intelligence.
Too many fancy words though, would be nice if the test changed if you stated you weren't a native speaker.

>>11277298
You don't use the words to determine relations between the objects themselves.
If you indeed do, your thinking must be an absolute mess.

>>11277298
>>11277298
You don't use words to determine the relations between objects.
If you indeed do, your thinking must be an absolute mess.

>>11277298
You don't use words to determine the relations between objects.
If you indeed do, your thinking must be an absolute mess.
>would be nice if the test changed if you stated you weren't a native speaker.
How do you learn a second language if you do? I cannot imagine how you could be anything but monolingual if your mind works that way.

Those faces were legitimately spooky

>>11277246
what is your evidence for the autism claim

I don't know what went wrong with the verbal stuff, considering I was in the top percentile of students in a subject that's basically just writing essays.

>>11277477
It's a well established fact that autistic people have superhuman visuospatial intelligence; I'm not going to bother looking up sources for you. Google it.

>>11277367
You do not use words to determine relations between objects, yes.
Objects and categories are however often conveyed in the form of words. If you can understand the word and the category's relation to another word and category then yeah good you've found a category, not in something necessarily verbal but just something conveyed verbally.
I don't quite understand the second part of your reply. However perhaps my phrasing was bad, I was just referring to the fact that non-native speakers may have selective vocabularies as they generally don't have as much experience with any languages beyond their first one.

>>11276813
2 hours to get handover, 2 hours to give it

>>11270089

>>11270803
>>11270824
Same thing got me, I realized it afterward.

>>11276819
WAKA WAKA

>>11270620
Send this to them and ask for an interview. It proves you are in the top 1% for intelligence.

>>11271449
>why yes, I'm an economist, how did you know?

>>11270089
am i retarded

>>11270704
how so?

fellow peanut bros rejoice

>>11270524
I had a similar experience with the faces. Some of the expressions are more complex, either being faked or only having the dominant emotion be the same as in the other picture, while ultimately the expression does not mean the same thing.

To get them all right you have to realize that who or whatever they used to categorize the faces was essentially on the spectrum and couldn't discern the difference. There is a very simple pattern of how you have to answer wrong to be "right".

>>11270089
Lots of noises around me, non-native
The verbal reasoning score makes me wonder if l'm retarded and ashamed from saying l'm a lawyer

>>11270089
would have got max on the autism check if they used white faces

>>11278360
It's also confusing that the black people are making white faces. Really, why that?

Annoyed with myself because I didn't realise you needed to predict where the blocks would fall on the Blocks test.

So which trait is a red flag for autism? Verbal comprehension, emotional discrimination, verbal reasoning or a combination of the 3?

>>11270089
Guess they let about anyone in STEM now

>>11279345
Was it autism?

The face one was bullshit, I tried going by mouth and eye brows.

Memory was brutal, after 6 numbers I shut down, the squares were easier

I'm got above average so I don't have to kill myself feelsgoodman

Those faces were terrible ugly and bad actors

that was oddly disappointing. the one where i have to remember the blocks was fucked my brain does not work for that

>>11270089
Some sections did not load on my phone. I guess I’m low iq.

>>11270089
Wow, entire skewed in a manner to give a specific result. No tanks.

>>11270323
>weak planning
>worked as a schedular
...
>didn't screengrab
>redraw from memory instead

Top kek and tragic irony right there.

how to word more gooder?

>>11279501
you were overthinking them friend

>>11276730
same

I read all the time but when it comes to exams and tests with wording my brain just drops 70iq points

I might be retarded

Are mental rotation, verbal reasoning and spatial working memory the /sci/ autist skills?

>>11279678
No the test isn’t g loaded at all

This makes sense. I'm really bad at chess (planning), and apparently reading emotions based off faces.

non-native, apparently I'm retarded

wtf I got all block correct yet it shows I got 0?
wasnt suprised my emotional shit is as good as most of anons

>>11270089
To the moon

I may have autism

>>11270089
the verbal memory one glitched out so i couldnt answer any. it probably wouldve been my worst one regardless

not a /sci/fag

>>11270089
At the end it asks you what percentile of intelligence you think you fall under. So how do you rank one of these?
If you were just at the top 10% mark for all categories, what %ile does that make you overall?

>>11270089
what a lame test
damn these threads

>>11280968
If it's so boring why is yours an exclamation mark?

>>11280972
i don't know i randomly guessed everything!

/sci/ anons what am i supposed to feel

The rotation one was pretty poorly designed. Vast majority of the time if not all the time it was a test too see which pic also has a blue square right beside a red square or something.

:-)

i don't know english and never saw a colored """person""" in my life.

I am getting spied on by cultist sects my internet and computer hardly works but here's an algorithm for prime square every prime number then multiply each prime number with the products and add 1 to it to get the next prime

tfw galaxy brain

poorly coded trash
i got 15/15 on the blocks portion and it never gave me towers of hanoi
also i have ADD so the number sequence and grid memory sequences were ridiculous

am i retarded? wtf i have an 140 iq btw

Those faces were bullshit. Also, non-native speaker so I didn't know some of the words.

>>11281559
you don't need to know the words

I found the word rounds most comfy and fun to do and feel like a total brainlet on the puzzles and memory tests. What can I do with this information?

Who /shitmemory/ here

>>11282873
AMA btw