[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 195 KB, 734x655, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11258423 No.11258423 [Reply] [Original]

Is there a way to come up with stable orbits around a star mathematically? As in given the star's mass and the distance from it what velocities the object needs to be moving at to keep a stable orbit around it?

I'd imagine factoring in the pull of other objs from each other can be ignored since it's minimal compared to that of the star's mass?

>> No.11258431

Yes

>> No.11258435

yes

>> No.11258473

Yes

>> No.11258474

Yes

>> No.11258493

>>11258423

You are thinking of Atoms are Galaxies theory, arent you.

The gatom (galaxy atom) is pulling in infinite energy from its surroundings, just like galaxies at our scale. Matterbis infinitely bubbling from the quantum foam and being pulled into the galaxy and or atom. Universe is infinitely deep. So no, its not stanle luke how you are thinking of it.

>> No.11258505

OP, be honest with me, have you taken a physics class ever? This is something you'd learn a month into any PHYS 101 course

>> No.11258508

>>11258493
Well no but I will read into it.
>>11258505
I have but it's been many year since i took a few in uni and I don't really recall a lot of it.

>> No.11258514

>>11258508
Centripetal force = mv^2 / r

>> No.11258517

>>11258493
>You are thinking of Atoms are Galaxies theory, arent you.
the fuck is this shit?

>> No.11258523

>>11258514
And centripetal force is given by GMm/r^2. Set LHS=RHS and you get
v=sqrt(GM/r)
there ya go, OP

>> No.11258525

>>11258523
Thanks fellow physics chad, I was being lazy. Maybe OP was trying to find lagrange points?

>> No.11258531
File: 124 KB, 615x734, 1575786226504.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11258531

>>11258525
I dont think so. This board is subundergrad central.

>> No.11258539

>>11258523
Thanks pal.

>> No.11258542

>>11258517

Atoms are just tiny galaxies, brah. Like Men in Black.

Seriously though. Shit makes perfect sense. Universe is a fractal

>> No.11258543

>>11258517
>>11258493
>>11258542
I didn't realize that Niels Bohr posted on /sci/