/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11250185
nah mate, not cope. It may be that women have a slightly higher average IQ, but the greater variance really is the reason for male dominance in the hardest sciences. There just aren't the same numbers in the female genius tail of their distribution. Why does this upset you, female?

>>11250191
Give it 20 years and the gentlemen's club atmosphere and nepotism of STEM will be replaced by actual meritocracy, dominated by high IQ women. Keep clutching to your unearned advantages while you still have them, moid, you'll be missing them when they're gone.

>>11250185
>women have higher average IQ
But they don't, roastie, they are more women of average intelligence than men.
Men have more members with a higher IQ... and more members that are thick as pigshit, this wider distribution causes them to have less at the average.

I know, thinking in multiple dimensions is hard for a female microbrain to comprehend, so I don't take offense that you don't get it

>>11250202
okay, you just keep telling yourself that.
There's nothing wrong with not being the best. I studied physics and was probably on par with the girls on my the course. But there were truly brilliant students who were all guys, no girls came close.

You won't notice these differences in low-tier sciences like biology and chemistry, may I add. There you'll probably see parity or slight female advantage.

>>11250185
>men have greater variance in intelligence
you're not very smart if you can't pick up on this in your personal day to day life. it's painfully obvious

>>11250213
this

>>11250185
SHUT THE FUCK UP CUNT, YOUR FUCKING BITCHCUNT CUNTERY COMPLETELY FUCKING RUINED SNL AND THE DAILY SHOW. YOU NEED COCK IN YOUR MOUTH AT ALL TIMES TO STOP YOU FROM EXPELLING STUPID AND SHITTING UP EVERYTHING GOOD.

>>11250213
>>11250223
cope

>>11250226
seethe

>>11250231
IF YOU AREN'T SEETHING EVERY FUCKING TIEM YOU WATCH STUPID CUNTS TRY TO BE FUNNY YOUR A PATHETIC EXCUSE FOR A MAN GO LOP YOUR FUCKING DICK OFF YOU DO NOT DESERVE IT

>>11250231
>oh no I've lost the argument
>better just call things cope and seethe

>>11250185
I am not saying it's not true.
But could please link the paper which states that females have higher average iq.

>>11250185
Only literal retards take comfort in dubious positive traits of their group, seeking to associate these traits with themselves, in an attempt to boost a frail ego. This is also why racism and Nazism of the kind displayed on /pol/ is ultimately a collectivist ideology and a cousin to communism and socialism.

As for me, I had myself professionally tested and my IQ is 148, which makes me smarter than 99.86% of the people on this Earth. That is good enough for me.

It is the individual that matters and forges his own destiny. Not the State, the group, the nation, the race, nor the religion. All of these are social constructs and collectivist fever dreams to trap the strong and intelligent into servitude of the weak and stupid. To bind the masters into the slave morality of the serfs.

>>11250265
based gigasperg

>>11250185
got a citation for that? all the studies I've seen give men a very slightly higher average..

>>11250265
Retards like you live pathetically unaware of the arbitrary paradigms they think through. Let me give you a hint: individualism is ontologically wrong.

>>11250185
>it became clear that women have higher average IQ.

>>11250284
>individualism is ontologically wrong
i don't understand what the fuck you're trying to express here.

>women attend college more
>mostly liberal arts degrees

Wow. Women sure are smarter, men eternally BTFO

>>11250301
>i-it doesn't count because i don't like it!
cope

>>11250301
>>11250303
HOW ABOUT THIS, YOU'RE BOTH FAGGOTS LOL

>>11250284
>Let me give you a hint: individualism is bad :(

>>11250316

>>11250185
The future is here.

>>11250321
tiny fucking thing, i need something with more mass that can handle a real pounding

>>11250185
Men are more intelligent than women.

If you call yourself a feminist you should read or listen to Camile Paglia
she should be required reading for anyone using the label


When will female sewage engineers get around to fixing the effluent build up and fatberg problem?

>poorly constructed and obvious bait thread
>serious replies
clearly no one here is in the tail end of genius

>>11250265
Yes, basically. OP is thinking anyone should care about the average of "his" group instead of his own score, and if your IQ is 140 but you are a man posting in this thread, you are coping. Why is OP acting like this?

>>11250336
IF YOU AREN'T TAKING CHANNING SRSLY YOU NEED TO GET THE FUCK OUT RIGHT NOW IM NOT EVEN JOKING SHUT THE FUCK UP AND GET THE FUCK OUT RIGHT NOW YOU DONT BELONG LOL

men too busy jerking off and being pathetic beta males to do science

>>11250361
>implying jerking off isn't a release valve for the unbearable energy and responsibility men hve to bear their entire miserable fucking lives
I WILL FUCK YOUR CUNT INTO PURE EUPHORIC OBLIVION LOL

>>11250364
basically this

Lets see the life of the most intelligent human, the white male:
>be treated like shit, stress which destroys the brain becomes almost infinite if there are minorities since they bully you to pretty much death, youth suicides have skyrocket
>be told from young age that you're actually a women and that you're guilty of the holocaust and the slavery even if your nation and people have nothing to do with it
>women chastise you and laugh at you for even looking at them
Sure its all equal, maybe one day for no reason at all something might happen...

>>11250389
very based post

>>11250265
>This is also why racism and Nazism of the kind displayed on /pol/ is ultimately a collectivist ideology
yes, everyone belongs to a group or a collective
thanks for that, retard

>>11250393
There are even more variables like affirmative action, parents unironically being told to not read to their children since it makes a difference in upbringing. Being fed onions food, being told that you're white male and should shut up, even if your post is sarcastic that is a reality I myself have witnessed. You have no idea how malicious non-whites are towards white people.

women are for breeding not for reading

>not wanting to shag high IQ qts and produce high IQ children with them

OP is just mad because she will never be exceptional, or is a guy and is white knighting because he thinks it will get him the puss puss. There is nothing wrong with women not being exceptional in the way men are in science. Most of those guys are fucking mentally-tortured freaks, you wouldn't want to be them.

>>11250409
for >>11250406
sorry

>>11250406
Fuck off.

>>11250202
>Female nepotism.
Already happening with affirmative action.
kys cancerous feminist.

>>11250185
IQ doesn't mean shit in academia. It only mesuares your capacity to find specific kinds of patterns, which is not very useful in academia nor is a good proxy to estimate your intelligence. What a good academic really needs to distinguish himself from his peers is the capacity to have ideas others don't have, i.e., creativity.
Women seem to be less creative than men, but my take is that this is the case because our society tends to make women submissive, which inhibits their creativity.

>>11250202
Whats a "moid"?

>>11250389
Im a white dude and none of this have been true for me.
Those around me admire my masculinity and resolve, Women love and minorities tend to stay away from me.

>>11250546
good for you, cunt
not true for most guys

>>11250185
Fuck off tranny

>>11250557
I'm a guy and I agree with everything he said. I have a normal life with a job, a gf, my own house, I don't feel like anybody is putting me down or treating me like shit. Most guys I see on the streets look happy as well.

Perhaps the one with the problem is you, incel, have you ever thought about that?

>>11250562
for every white guy you see out happy on the street, there's 0.5 sad white guys at home rotting, I assure you. Piss off.

>>11250567
cope

>>11250567
Sounds like a convenient explanation that absolves you personally of all guilt in your life situation. No different than a nigger blaiming the white man for keeping him down.

Never been a fan of the victim mentality myself.

>>11250571
>Never been a fan of the victim mentality myself.
do you think I go out in public and act like an entitled prick? No, I'm quiet, helpful and all the rest of it. But fuck me does it wear me down being put down constantly.

>>11250577
See a therapist.

>>11250265
Based, fuck collectivists

Honestly I find it more interesting that despite women having a smaller brains (supposedly 10% smaller) than men and different neurological wiring they still maintain a roughly equal IQ average. Which tells me their brains are more efficient and the big brain/cranial size hypothesis is inaccurate as that is just quirk of the male sex rather than an implicit explanation for IQ. The study below seems to verify this.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/04/study-finds-some-significant-differences-brains-men-and-women

>Adjusting for age, on average, they found that women tended to have significantly thicker cortices than men. Thicker cortices have been associated with higher scores on a variety of cognitive and general intelligence tests. Meanwhile, men had higher brain volumes than women in every subcortical region they looked at, including the hippocampus (which plays broad roles in memory and spatial awareness), the amygdala (emotions, memory, and decision-making), striatum (learning, inhibition, and reward-processing), and thalamus (processing and relaying sensory information to other parts of the brain).

>>11250185
>higher average IQ
Yet literally every paleolithic invention was made by male bipedal apes, the only ones coping are you femoid subhumans.

>>11250605
women have massively inferior spatial reasoning

>>11250620

Yet their IQ average is barely affected by that inferiority. What does this tell you about IQ then?

But that whole sentence on variance was a rebuttal to a complaint about not enough female PhDs in STEM?

No one cares about all of your "doctors" in fucking English and Sociology

>>11250633
You’re fucking stupid man.

>>11250202
>gender equality
>means more wahmens in stem
nope

>>11250185
>wahmens
>doing better in academia
nope, wahmens go into the diploma mill majors.

>>11250185
>wahmens
>doing better in academia
nope, wahmens go into the diploma mill majors.

>>11250639

You can call me stupid all you want but that doesn't change the fact women seem to have more efficient brains in terms of IQ. Their brains are 10% smaller but still maintain similar average as men.

>>11250185
>There's a reason why men aren't making it in academia anymore.
because they aren't let in to begin with because of LBJ and his anti-discrimination policy, which is actually a discrimination policy.

>>11250208
This

>>11250643
>>11250648

Our society is going to continue to be a circus where 10% of men do 75% of the intellectual heavy-lifting, while doling out token roles and white collar non-jobs to women with diploma mill degrees who all pat each other on the back and claim the future is female and the patriarchy is keeping them down

>>11250265

> 148 IQ
> Individualist

Doubt. Staunch individualism requires healthy serving of insecurity to be an ideal to strive to - it's a fantasy for those who lack the necessary strength to really stand on your own. It's a coping mechanism that someone smart enough to pass life on ez mode doesn't need.

An intelligent person just looks at the overwhelming evidence and goes "yup, black people are dumber" and thinks of the implication without an emotionally driven reaction

>>11250202
>dominated by high IQ women

This assumes women want to work, which they generally don't if some man will do the work for them.

>>11250185
>women have higher average IQ
They don't.

Men no longer flourish in academia because the anti-testicle police are persecuting masculinity. Women are inferior to men in almost every way other growing babies and nursing them.

Unsourced chart shows that there about two female idiots for each male idiot, and there are more than 100 male super geniuses for every female one, if there even are any , which I doubt. Unsourced chart supports my intuition and experience.

The thing about being a female "idiot" is that you don't need to have a IQ to be a good and loving mother.

High IQ women are the bane of my fucking existence. I'd rather have a room fool of average to retarded male engineers then one woman in the group. Men by nature cooperate and function better then women.

>>11250185
>im a girl
I love you

>>11250653
nah, it's about a 4 point advantage for men

extra brain size is costly and if it were possible to have the same intelligence with a smaller brain men would have evolved it first, because men are always under great selective pressure

IQ tests are constructed to minimize sex differences in average performance, academia is filled to the brim with egalitarian activists who downplay studies showing male advantage and instead favor anything showing women might have something to compensate for their smaller brains, but the slightly lower avg female IQ is just a result of women not facing the same pressures to evolve higher intelligence as men

>>11250605
visual spatial reasoning correlates strongly with brain size, verbal reasoning does not.

>>11250643
Why do you idiots always cut off the axis?

Meanwhile in OP's room...

>>11250744
Of course you love him. OP is nice ;)

>>11250720
>muh oppression
just because academia is no longer coddling low IQ failures through nepotism doesn't mean you're being "persecuted". lose the victim mentality, tard

>>11251180
>Coddling low IQ failures

Last time I checked that was called affirmative action and benefits mainly women. They get the scholarships and jobs just because they were born with vagina.

Check the female privilege .

>>11250185
>There's a reason why men aren't making it in academia anymore
Over 90% research still males, over 99.99% breakthrough papers still males.

>>11251198
https://atlantablackstar.com/2019/09/27/the-real-affirmative-action-research-on-harvard-admissions-process-exposes-benefits-reaped-by-43-of-white-admitted-students/

let's face it, if college admissions were based on merit only men would be far worse off than they are currently

>>11251224
Just white males, asian males will skyrocket

>>11251224
remove jews from the white category and see what happens

>>11250185
>Funny how men went from "men are physically stronger than women" to "a-actually men have greater variance in strength which means that there are more athletic male compared to women" after it became clear that women have higher average athleticism.
>Sure smells like cope to me. There's a reason why men aren't making it in athleticism anymore.

>>11251224
>Picking a source that aligns to your beliefs.

http://ideas.time.com/2013/06/17/affirmative-action-has-helped-white-women-more-than-anyone/

Keep the misandry going.

>>11250207
>But they don't, roastie

IQ is not the only thing that matters retards. Asians have higher IQs and they eat dogs. The nature of a woman isn't suited for work, it's suited for having/raising children like every woman before them. It's irrelevant how high their IQ is.

>>11251485
gigacope

>>11250185
>>11250202
oof
>inb4 cope reply

>>11250185
Women are objectively superior to men in every aspects of life, this is why most of them don't reproduce and are being disposed of by throwing them into meat grinders we call wars. It's unsurprising that men were sissies with inferiority complex all along.

Meh, what someone might assert as inherent flaws, I would debate is weakness in all of us. It's easier to give in to the copius amount of distractions all around us than fighting temptation. I figured that went without saying. Just remember, ask yourself are you living up to your full potential? I would bet a majority what say no. I also am not, but I'm trying.

>>11250185

Perhaps you could just be content in doing well instead of feeling the need to put others down?

>>11250185
>women have higher average IQ.
sauce?

>>11250265
sargon, go away. you already got btfo by richard spencer on this issue

>>11251602
I try to live by a quote I heard when I was younger.
do what deserves to be written, write what deserves to be read.

>>11250185
I wonder if the change in IQ scores has anything to do with them changing the tests every year

> another IQ thread

God I can't wait until men are dominated by genius amazons

>>11250185
You're probably not in Academia, so here's why:
Academia sucks. The scientific method isn't used anymore, grant farming is everywhere, publish or perish culture ruined genuine research, it's all about networking now.

tits or gtfo

>>11250202
That might happen! Because of discrimination against men :p

>>11250284
>individualism is ontologically wrong.

>an element (i.e. individualism) of an ontology (which ontology?) is wrong
>the ontology of 'individualism' is wrong (i.e. inconsistent? what is the ontology of individualism?)

please elaborate

>>11250213
You anecdotal evidence is irrelevant, shitbird.