[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 21 KB, 212x270, Kurt_gödel_shittin_on_physicalists.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11238799 No.11238799[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Why haven't the morons on this board given up the falsified philosophy of Materialism?

>> No.11238802

Tesla was contacted by Celestial entity #7, who sort of reminds me of ariana grande, at one point. And entity #7 told him that there were going to be human brain experiments soon involving electricity.

I believe that the prediction of the impeachment by my girlfriend was impressive for the following reasons:

(1) I had no idea that they were hearing about it that day
(2) I didn't think he would be impeached

Now interestingly, even if I DID post about it, this is the genius of her, it STILL wouldn't have made a difference because OTHER people knew when the impeachment hearing was scheduled for and other people maybe had more information leading them to believe he would be impeached when both of these things were completely coincidental for me and not intuitive at all.

Now, she does an extremely good job of surpressing the accuracy of my predictions so that nobody but me believes me, now my life would feel like being in a horror movie except I know that she is good so it's actually a happy story. Ramanujan violated his blood-pact with my girlfriend's associate which is why Ramanujan was assassinated by the divine, but he was actually given a lot of important information and given permission to tell other people about it, although he also was surpressed greatly in his own lifetime and nobody listened to him back then, but he had agreed to a blood-pact and violated it, I don't think the same thing ever happened to me.

Now it's physically impossible to deny what had already happened, she DID predict it but how can I prove this? She is just TOO good! I don't think I can prove it!

No I am not crazy yes I am telling the truth.

No, atheism is NOT correct.

Anybody who calls me crazy is either being paid to correct the record or they are a brainwashed atheist sheep slave bot.

Lol.

>> No.11238821
File: 2.93 MB, 1716x1710, philosophy scientists vs pseudo-rhetoricians.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11238821

Anyone who isn't an interactionist dualist is unironically retarded.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>> No.11238919
File: 625 KB, 1036x2498, Determinism.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11238919

>>11238799
Didn't you answer your own question? Because they are morons obviously. Only so many NPC can be awakened at any one time and during kali yuga this number is at its lowest, yet another proof against free will. They simply can' decode that frequency the matrix prevents because it would crash the matrix if more than about 15% or so knew during this yuga

>> No.11238995
File: 84 KB, 904x864, 32406.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11238995

>>11238802
>reddit spacing

>> No.11239124

>>11238821
prove your body is real.
>>11238799
give me your xbox then.

>> No.11239170

>>11238799

Materialism is wrong in the sense that what our Universe is, is as Ken Wheeler calls it, incommeasurable. It cannot be fully measured by any human tool now or ever... however, materialism is correct in the sense that this Universe is a perfect and determanistic logic system, it simply operates ourside the ability of our perfect measurement for the simple reason that it is infinite, and our tools are not.

>> No.11239179

>>11239170
proof the universe is infinite?

>> No.11239182
File: 12 KB, 390x470, incommeasurable_amounts_of_keks.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11239182

>>11239170
>Ken Wheeler

>> No.11239199

>>11238799
>thinking Gödel's theorems have anything to say about materialism
popmath fag

>> No.11239226
File: 15 KB, 376x250, godel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11239226

>>11239199
>thinking they dont

>> No.11239228

>>11239226
>they dont
"Yes"

>> No.11239229
File: 204 KB, 397x514, 1925_kurt_gödel.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11239229

>>11239226
They don't

>> No.11239231
File: 41 KB, 474x752, heisenberg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11239231

>>11239170
>determanistic
false and also misspelled

>> No.11239234

>>11239231
QM is deterministic

>> No.11239239

>>11239234
No, it isn't

>> No.11239240

>>11239239
>how to spot someone who pretends to know QM but actually doesnt

>> No.11239244

>>11239240
It literally isn't, the deterministic evolution of Schrodinger equation is not determinism you stupid fucking moron

>> No.11239249

>>11239244
>the deterministic evolution of Schrodinger equation is not determinism
explain

>> No.11239267

>>11238799
How is “materialism” “falsified”?

>> No.11239270

>>11239249
Stochasticism and randomness aren't the same thing and neither of them are deterministic.

>> No.11239278

>>11239270
stochastic =/=> nondeterminism

>> No.11239299

>>11239278
The word stochastic means random literally

>> No.11239302

>>11239299
good thing quantum processes aren't random

>> No.11239328

>>11238995
>not reddit spacing
>would prefer a giant wall of text
>>>/lgbt/

>> No.11239354

>>11239328
>would prefer a giant wall of text
yes

>> No.11239374

>>11239328
It takes less time to scroll past your useless retard post.

>> No.11239399

>>11239374
It wasn't my post, seethe, phone faggots.

>> No.11239422

>>11238799
Because there's still money in it. It's reaching its last days though.

>> No.11239456

>muh Godel's incompleteness proves God!
>muh Godel's incompleteness proves the world is infinite!
How about God=infinity
You are both right

>> No.11239466

>>11239456
God is a mathematical concept that doesn’t have any evidence of matching reality?
Hmm.

>> No.11239479

>>11239466
>No evidence of matching reality

You can't be more wrong.

>> No.11239485

>>11239466
Mathematics is just another form of language that can you lead you to the proof of God.

>> No.11239616

>>11239456
>Sometimes quite fantastic conclusions are drawn from Gödel's theorems. It has been even suggested that Gödel's theorems, if not exactly prove, at least give strong support for mysticism or the existence of God. These interpretations seem to assume one or more misunderstandings which have already been discussed above: it is either assumed that Gödel provided an absolutely unprovable sentence, or that Gödel's theorems imply Platonism, or anti-mechanism, or both.

>> No.11239632

>>11239479
>You can’t be more wrong

You can’t be more wrong.

>> No.11239705

>>11238821
Idk about 'true' but it seems the most powerful descriptor.

>> No.11239852

You answered your own question.
They’re morons who think that anyone who disagrees with them is being arrogant.

>> No.11239887
File: 119 KB, 500x599, african students.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11239887

>>11239299
>>11239270
not being able to measure something without affecting it doesnt mean its not determinist

>> No.11239900

>>11239852
They refer to anyone who thinks differently to them as "schizophrenic", which is the perfect display of their level of maturity. They'd probably read the quotes on the left here >>11238821 and consider them similarly delusional, were it not for the names and visages of the renowned scientists beside them.

>> No.11240032

Both sides here are “incommensurably” retarded. What a joke of a board