[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 14 KB, 599x333, tdse.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11235253 No.11235253 [Reply] [Original]

The total energy of the universe appears to be 0. Let us assume it is 0. Then to observe the universal wavefunction, I can only observe that which I'm not a part of so I take my mass out of the mass of the universe. The effective observable universe for me now has the mass (0-m) where I am 'm' kg. Now the time evolution of this wavefunction is seemingly dependent on my mass out of everything that could've been. Therefore different observers will observe different universes.

>> No.11235307

>The total energy of the universe appears to be 0
Stopped reading there

>> No.11235315

>>11235307
Why?

>> No.11235321

>>11235315
it's actually pne quantum fluctuation, so obviously you deserve to die

>> No.11235370

>>11235253
Remember that you are two observers because you have two eyes

>> No.11235374

>>11235253
>The total energy of the universe appears to be 0.
bait

>> No.11235461

>>11235374
>>11235307
https://youtu.be/lawW60-oeF8?t=207
Get fuggin takin down by based black man bitch.

>> No.11236011

>>11235307
>>11235374
retard

>> No.11236841

>>11235461
I really doubt he ever says the net energy density of the universe is zero since that is obviously false.

I didn't bother to watch that video. The title is "universe is flat." Yes it is true as far as we can tell the universe is flat. And it requires a positive energy density for this to be possible. Look up "critical density," and learn something for a change

>> No.11236868

>>11235370
Now that triggered my humerus

>> No.11236872

>>11236841
>You'll starship right off the edge!

>> No.11237013

The total energy of the universe is ZERO(0).

>> No.11237103

>>11235253
>I can only observe that which i'm not part of
you can't observe yourself? WUt? You do realize that you do not need 85% of you body mass to observe something right.