/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11229338
>Porn releases Dopamine which encourages new sources and causes "porn-induced erectile dysfunction" .
That is not the mechanism for PIED, which isn't really a problem anyways compared to how pornography hijacks and ultimately ruins the brain. If you're older than 25, it's too late without extreme drugs.

>>11229338
>>11229343
Do you think maybe you’ve made enough threads about this, asswipe?

>>11229355

Just wanted feedback on the thesis for a paper

>>11229338
i agree, and this is an acceptable angle for sociology. but there is more to it which would not be accepted due to modern dogma despite being true. why do so many men flock to porn? because women's egos have become so inflated they end up in multiple chad harems. thus they cannot form stable relationships with their actual equals due to their inability to pair-bond from riding the cock carousel and >80% of males are better off going their own way and do. but those men still have sex drives that are not satiated so they flock on the path of least resistance which is porn and become coombrains for your aforementioned reasons.

>>11229367

Could possibly lead into a segue about the sexual revolution and how it's been a disaster for the human race, considering the dogma sources countering degeneracy are especially hard to find, but I've been referred to Dr. E Michael Jones a number of times.

>>11229376
this channel goes over studies explaining some of these phenomena. this video in particular is really good, arguably his magnum opus:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fx-3lK_6ZQc

75% of divorces are initiated by women
Women are responsible for dead bedrooms
Women destroy the lives of men by taking away 50% of a man's value
Porn has existed for the entirety of human history, whether it be marble statues, paintings, clay figures or cave drawings
What hasn't existed for most of human history is women not being housewives

>>11229401
Yes, the sexual revolution and "Women's empowerment" has caused the decline of marriage and stability in the west, but porn shouldn't be ignored. When men are discouraged from monogamy and encouraged into casual sex/degeneracy they turn to porn and it's affect on the brain shouldn't be discounted, as well as the massive industry marketing towards destroying the psychology of not only men, but especially young men: most common ages below 18 first exposed to porn are 9-13.

>>11229367
>>11229376
>>11229401
>>11229408
When you put in place so many mechanisms to prevent incels from getting gfs, then suppress any attempts to talk about these problems, that's when coomers appear and proliferate.

>>11229412
Volcels and trashing on whores/sluts is getting more and more popular and thrown into public light in the political world, very excited to see this put onto a massive stage like the republican party or something in the coming years.

>>11229367
>>11229376
>>11229401
>>11229408
>>11229412
Or it could just be that porn feels good to watch and jack off to. Because of this we've been making porn for centuries and the reason people have seemingly started using it so much now is because the internet has made it exponentially easier to access.

Or you know, wahmen bad or some shit. Whatever.

>>11229421
>wahmen bad or some shit. Whatever.

Yes, when women are selfish and go against their intrinsic desires they become dopamine seeking whores. This has the affect of cracking the foundation which built modern western-civ, such as monogamy, fertility, and self respect.

so yes women are bad.

>>11229421
People back in the day didn't live in a Society™

>>11229421
>porn feels good
only while fapping and right after ejaculation but then it feels awful. porn cannot and will never replace the elation from making love and neither can casual sex. but since casual sex and even moreso making love are much more difficult and porn is so accessible yeah most people go with the path of least resistance. but you need to understand the context in which we live. if casual sex was as easy for men as women there would be no porn. and if people had their heads screwed on right and were long term planners then finding a stable relationship (which most men want and women eventually sob over not being able to form from their inability to pair bond from riding the cock carousel) would be the norm and society would be much more stable as a result instead of the powder keg it is today.

>>11229427
then when they hit their 30s they pay for their promiscuity. as seen from the countless whinging articles from post-wall sluts either crying about 'where have all the good men gone' or 'i need no man' copes. it's so bad there are men who made a careers going over them:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2DE_OszzUw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SPhmRWn1ns

>>11229401
>Porn has existed for the entirety of human history
Yeah, back in the 1800's I could just search up 5 men hammering a teen girl and jizzing in her face on my cell phone.

>>11229559
but but we had scandalous ankles weekly back then. it's totally the same thing...

>>11229338
>Porn releases Dopamine which encourages new sources and causes "porn-induced erectile dysfunction"
I can say from personal experience that this is not a problem

>3 frogs and a wojak on page 1
yikes Yikes YIKES

>>11229559
>>11229582
>missing the point
If you're actively searching gangrape that's on you. In the 1800s you could get a whore, a side mistress, a wife, and second wife.

>>11229589
i wasn't trying to detract from that pt, i just wanted to elaborate on what porn was back then.

>>11229421
>Or you know, wahmen bad or some shit. Whatever.
I don't think "wahmen bad," but clearly the sexual revolution and the general women's empowerment thing has kinda fucked up sexual politics and shifted the balance of power way too far to their side. Clearly something is happening where women pretty much get all the benefits in dating and men kinda barely get any (the one thing being that a woman's value decreases with age and even then, it's really not *that* big of an issue these days). Not to mention marriage rates going down, divorce rates going up, more and more people being raised by single parents, birth rates going down, etc. It's probably 100% womens' faults in the least, but it's also not sustainable and clearly not good for society as a whole.

>>11229363
Okay then. Let me tell you what I think then. I don’t think you’re even currently enrolled in any education program.

>>11229338
Nice /pol/science, but we already have a billion porn threads up already.

>>11229690
Hitler managed to make a pretty good dent of 6 million jews. Unless that was fake? :)

>>11229690
>RIGHT WING SCIENCE!!

>>11229710
>>11229743
Yes. Go shit up your containment board.

>>11229654
kek BTFO

>>11229746
Science is inherently right-wing dummie

>>11229756
Reality has a liberal bias, sweety.

imagine if you had an interest in science that wasn't politically motivated

>>11229589
>In the 1800s you could get a whore, a side mistress, a wife, and second wife.
Having sex with women is not the problem. The problem is an internet soaked in hardcore pornography at everyone's fingertips

>>11229690
>/pol/science
It's true, I quit using porn and became Hitler and started watching Ben Shapiro

>>11229338
read counter arguments and counter them.
don't echo your own dumb fuck thoughts

>>11229338
this mother fucker is on 4chan whining about degeneracy.