[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 50 KB, 308x500, 51H8k+iO9rL.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11220067 No.11220067 [Reply] [Original]

Would people like Nikola Tesla and Isaac Newton have been NEETs in our modern world?

>> No.11220068

>>11220067
They wouldn't have amounted to anything because the only reason they were able to do anything is because they did not waste semen. Today it is almost impossible with the countless distractions everywhere.

>> No.11220080
File: 8 KB, 250x202, images.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11220080

>>11220068
>they were able to do anything is because they did not waste semen
Nonsense.
I remember of that mathematician that got good only after marriage.

>> No.11220087
File: 300 KB, 838x793, 1559417655676.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11220087

>>11220080
Idiot.

>> No.11220092

>>11220068
he knews

>> No.11220098

>>11220067
>NEETs
No. NEETdom would likely disgust them as it runs counter to their work ethic. No one who has ever achieved anything would relate to a NEET.

>> No.11220106

>>11220067
they were schizotypal

>> No.11220498

>>11220087
Kys schizo.

>> No.11220685
File: 3.25 MB, 1468x1082, lol.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11220685

>>11220087
vinci fucked men retard
>>11220067
People like them would be / are researchers. NEETS are degenerate gamers. Retarded fucking question

>> No.11220717
File: 8 KB, 271x186, Sseth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11220717

>>11220067
NEET I don't know but definitely shunned in our modern world.
Tesla is the kind of guy to post on /x/
Newton would have been a crossposter between /biz/ (up to the point he lost everything on crypto) and probably some /sci/ schizo (since he had manic disorder).

>>11220685
I don't know for Da Vinci but Michelangelo was a sefl hating faggot in the way he hated having homosexual pulsions and had profound guilt over it, not a long shot to expect the same from Da Vinci.

>> No.11220731

>>11220067
They were doing work. Both were inventors. So not NEETs(Not in Education, Employment, or Training).

>> No.11220947

>>11220717
Hey, hey people..

>> No.11220965

>>11220685
>vinci fucked men retard
based on a baseless charge that was dismissed. the only retards who actually think he was a homosexual are pop-his imbeciles listening to fake news like Walter Isaacson and fiction like dan brown's da vinchi code.

>> No.11220966
File: 128 KB, 513x789, Heaviside.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11220966

An actual NEET scientist

>> No.11220975

Does this thread have any purpose other than trying to make you feel better about NEETdom?

>> No.11221038

>>11220965
I made my own extrapolations by looking at his implicit, homosexual paintings you fucking can of soup.

Also a man of that level of perception wouldn't be intellectually stimulated by a female in that period of time. They were analogous to walking cum rags.

Not hard to see that the bearded, polymathic faggot had an elevated taste for educated, gay men.

>> No.11221046

>>11221038
>my n=1 biased self-observations and reddit spacing make me an expert. dude you cant just be celibate, you need to fuck something, no sexual abstinence is impossible, it is either you fuck women or men, you cant choose neither.

>> No.11221053

>>11220067
Probably not. They were incredibly industrious people.

>> No.11221057

>>11221046
1. I don't frequent reddit.
2. You are attacking me not my argument you fallacy faggot.
3. I'm not an incel, women in that time weren't educated.
4. the image I originally responded to doesn't provide any evidence. It implies something.
5. EAT MY FUCKING COCK YOU BAITING FAGGOT

>> No.11221541

>>11220717
Wtf sseth posts on /sci/?

>> No.11221547

>>11220068
they didn't amount to anything in reality though

>> No.11221551

>>11221547
true because they didn't reproduce