[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 42 KB, 580x565, gaming food.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11126368 No.11126368 [Reply] [Original]

Favorite Mathematics and Science In Action Topics

>> No.11126382

using math to do more math

>> No.11126392

>>11126368
Is this YouTube research?

>> No.11126396

>>11126368
>Science in Action Topics
my computer and LCD screen, as well as everyone else's

the transistor effect and liquid crystals are fucking based. solid-state physics is fucking amazing and exotic phases of matter like liquid crystals are something i could lecture normies on for like an hour (but they never care to listen for more than 1 minute though)

who wants to talk about band gaps?

>> No.11126471

>>11126396

>/sci/'s other-than-Now-Industrial themed way of deriving computers and screens.

>> No.11126485

>>11126471
do you have an argument? i know from other threads that you are a science denier (thanks for namefagging yourself btw) so i just need to remind you that the device you are using to post the crap you post is absolute incontrovertible proof of science in action. deny it all you want but you are wrong.

>> No.11126514

>>11126485
That response was specifically for coming up with novel ways of "industrializing" various periods (which is relevant to literature, art, and gameplay ..).

The only "science" I'm denying is evolution as an explanation of origin and dating. The image posted has yet but received vague / non-conclusive replies.

>> No.11126517

>>11126382
Using math to do meth

>> No.11126538

>>11126514
because smart anons hide evolution denying posts. just because creationists and intelligent deniers stuck in 2007 continue to sell books on a debunked meme doesn't mean anybody cares about that. you should rethink why you willingly eat up anti-science crap from people sorely unqualified to have an opinion about such things

is it because what they say confirms your preconceived ideas? or is it because it is legitimately credible and empirically true? ask yourself that

>> No.11126540

>>11126538
oops. i meant
*intelligent designers
not "intelligent deniers"

>> No.11126564

>>11126538
>because ..
That's non-scientific.

>creatonists and intelligent designers
Spoiler: https://pastebin.com/5MYTic8T

>debunked
>[zero mentions of specifics]

>unqualified
Basically anybody that gathers together / finds problems with a theory are by definition "qualified" in having done so. .. But your vaguely-asserted problem with them is beyond the interest of this topic unless there's a practical application of such a scenario. Education isn't really it because of the very specific "awareness usage".