/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11099498

>>11099498
Any beautiful face shows proportions

[math]\frac{1}{3}=0.3333...[/math]
[math]\frac{1}{3} \times 3 = \frac{3}{3} = 1[/math]
[math]0.3333... \times 3 = 0.999999[/math]
[math]\therefore 1 = 0.9999...[/math]

>>11099515
Based.
>>11099904
none of those women are beautiful

[math] { \bf {Sets} }^{ { \bf C }^{op} } [ \mathrm{ Hom } (B,-) , \mathrm{ Hom } (A,-) ] \cong { \bf C } [A, B] [/math]

>>11099498

>>11100022

>>11099515
>generalized FTC
high school maths doesn't belong here
>>11100053
don't do my boy Perelman like that...
>>11100074
>defining d through coordinates
yikes. Also, the dq and d/dq should be switched. As it stands now, it doesn't make sense.
>>11099498
For me, it's pic related.

>>11100149
>Stoke's Theorem
>hs math

>>11100161
We teach integrals and derivatives in high school, and stokes theorem is just a generalisation of them.

>>11100149
I've also read a book on smooth manifolds, anon. No need to act so big about it

>>11100192
>I've also read a book on smooth manifolds, anon
Then you should also see how stokes' theorem is a trivial consequence of FTC.

>>11100217
>>stokes is consequence of ftc
>not other way around
anon come back when you can form a coherent thought.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AK-107
This motherfucker is a beauty of math and physics

>>11100149
>>11100184
>>11100217
>high school maths doesn't belong here
>We teach integrals and derivatives in high school, and stokes theorem is just a generalisation of them.
>Then you should also see how stokes' theorem is a trivial consequence of FTC.
seriously though, you're just making a fool of yourself now

>>11100161
yeah fuck that gatekeeping autist, stokes is bae

look at this motherfucker

>>11100370

>>11100373
Impressive. Very nice.

>>11100014
Not really amazing pleb, 1/3 isnt a whole number

>>11100022
Then what do you moron want to fuck.
Step aside for a real male faggot

>>11100053
I love this meme

the reply to image ratio of this thread is a pretty good approximation of pi
nice work, gents

>>11101141
Not anymore.

>>11101143
its ok thats why i took the picture c:

>>11100074

>>11100373
>>11100370
[math]\lfloor (e^{\phi}+\frac{pi}{3}) \cdot69 \rfloor = 420[/math]

>>11100034
>tautologies are beautiful

math is abstract

>>11100184
> we teach how to add and multiply numbers in school so field theory is just a generalization of them

larpers get out

>>11099498

>>11101184
I don't even know how to read this.
Either every theorem is a tautology, or you mean this is especially simple (it's probably not more simlpe than Eulers formula), or you say things should generally always be viewed in terms of their corresponding hom-functors and it's a tautologically in this sense.