/sci/ - Science & Math

Have you told him that an einstein-rosen bridge would decay within seconds due to Hawking radiation yet? Because that's basically why they're impossible right now, besides, you know, the fact that it would take the energy of a thousand suns to produce.

Why don't YOU go tell him? I've never heard of

>einstein-rosen bridge

>Hawking radiation

before.

Can you explain this to a fellow /sci/entist? I'm curious.

>>1107321
To summarize very briefly, Einstein-Rosen Bridge is a theoretical wormhole that could compliment general relativity rather than defying it. Basically, a black hole without a crushing singularity. Hawking Radiation is the radiation that causes black holes to decay over time (basically just proving that Black Holes aren't immortal and are still affected by entropy).

>>1107353

>a black hole without a crushing singularity

I have difficulty imagining how something like that would actually exist...

>Hawking Radiation is the radiation that causes black holes to decay over time

Ah, I thought that might be it. I saw that in his book.

Thanks. :)

>>1107380
They're pretty well described in mathematics, although we've never actually, you know, detected one. The problem is that they sort of "pinch off" into a singularity almost immediately, since that's the more stable alternative.

>>1107403

Ah.

So they do exist for a bit but they disappear before we could possibly make use of them? Shame.

>>>/x/4547989

>>1107403
They haven't been detected because they don't exist and the theories that predict them are wrong

>>1107449

>>1107252
Is that all you got /sci/? You didn't tear neither me or my idea apart. Because it still stands. Try to tear it down again and rebuild it with your own blood stained hands.

>>1107284
This guy can do it.

>>1107449
You said they havent detected them yet? So that must mean they dont exist, eh? Well, did you know, the universe is big man.

>>1107811
/r/ing /sci/'s take on this

>>1107284
uh.. a thousand suns? How did you come up with that conclusion?

>But how would one create a wormhole in our reality and not something hollywood creates to entertain the masses? Well the answer may actually lie in our birth, the fetus itself in fact.
Very nearly stopped reading right there.

>Because the fetus came from non existence TO existence, and once it was done developing, it transformed to allow a soul to board it.
Ah, there we go.

>>1107449
>They haven't been detected because they don't exist and the theories that predict them are wrong
Or, because the theories that state that they decay almost instantaneously are correct. That could work too.

>>1107797

Actually, we did.

You're either a troll or retarded. I'm on the fence as to which one.

>>1107859
Lemme get straight to the chase, there is no way to do anything dealing with wormholes or time travel with the way your minds are conditioned. If you think something is impossible, that's your fault. You have to change your mind and thus your perception of the things around you. Who cares if people think you're an idiot or not. I'm not here to be judged, all I wanna do is something impossible and rub it in your faces with my dick from millions of miles away.

>>1107883
By all means, develop this idea all you want, and try your damndest to make it happen.

Meanwhile, back in reality....

What about blackholes?
Couldn't they be used as wormholes?

>>1107890
Allow me to explain to you how I would do that.
First I would pick a song at random "Limb from Limb by Protest the Hero" for instance. I would then close my eyes and picture a million revolving possibilities and slowly single out a pattern through the Calculated Use of Sound. Then once I have the patterns down I will delve deeper into my subconscious until I hit either a net or a concrete floor. If its a floor I try again starting from the top, but if its a net, its one created through the subconcii of millions of innumerable people, I freeze capture that moment, picture my dick rubbing up against your faces and boom. Done. Whether it really happened or not doesn't matter anyway because time travel would only have a difference for the person doing it. not the ones around him. Even if that time travel were to directly effect others

>>1107939

>>1107939
So wait. what if a squirrel put their nuts in a wormhole and it closed before they pulled them back out, would they lose their nuts?

>>1107987
Uh huh...

>>1108004
That is not true! If a squirrel experienced time travel, no one would be aware of it but himself, so in order for his nuts to truly be lost that would mean he can't see them, but everyone else still could.

>>1107987
Depends how saggy the nuts are.

>>1108022
Maybe you're right, they'd just get really stretched out

>>1108019
So he'd see himself as having really stretched out nuts but everyone else would still see a small sack?