/sci/ - Science & Math

>>11054062
It was given a different velocity in the 4th spatial dimension during the Big Bang.

Hypothetical particles.
Never been observed.
Exist only in the minds of people that believe it.
Evidence for its existence is only ever present in fradulant and misleading abstract maths and erroneous experiments.
Quantum mechanics is a hoax.

>>11054075
based post.

>>11054062
Due to time dilation, the first few femtoseconds after the big bang were stretched into billions of years. During that time, a civilization of matter, and a civilization of antimatter formed. Recognizing the universe could not contain both of them, they had to go to war to survive, necessarily wiping the other out completely, along with the kind of matter that made them up.
Matter won.

>>11054075
>what is a PET scan?
Does /sci/ attract actual retards instead of just dumb popsci fans?

>>11054062
Its possible that at larger scales, our Observable Universe is just situated in a clump of matter and the overall Universe is composed of patches of matter and antimatter in random clumps, with large suoervoids between them because contact results in annihilation, which would have happened at the beginning of the Big Bang, and the resulting radiation has already diluted everywhere becoming indistinguishable from the CMBR.
The true question is: why is the Universe heterogeneous? The pre-Big Bang primordial singularity was a homogeneous point of mass-energy symmetrical in every way. Then a mysterious 'something' happened and the symmetries were broken, giving rise to time, charge and parity. What event caused a system in perfect equilibrium to be disturbed and give rise to all we see?
Is it a cyclical process? Does the Universe contract and relax periodically?
Was it an independent force? By what mechanism can this Natural God induce all we see, to be?

it's in the mirrorverse and it's stars, planets etc are causing the 'dark energy' effects that we see

>>11054075
we've created antimatter though?

>>11054276
And we use it in medical imaging. The entire concept of Penning traps was devised to store antimatter. That poster is just ignorant AF.

>>11054062
The standard model is not symmetric under charge conjugation and does not conserve baryon number (essentially the total number of quarks minus antiquarks). Under these conditions you can produce an excess of matter over antimatter if the universe is out of equilibrium, which it was due to the big bang

>>11054237
this. it should be obvious as fuck to anyone with above 70 IQ

Uncle Matter beat the piss out of her

>>11054062
I lost it. I'm sorry guys, it was me.

>>11054272
i put my dick in the universe and it exploded

>>11054258
PET scan uses gamma emission from radioactive decay of isotopes. Nothing quantum about it. You are incorrect sir.

>>11054290
No we don't. Provide some literature to prove that.

Ever wondered if the antimatter that is missing from our plane of time existence in the universe is trapped in between filaments of time space and is what scientists call "dark matter"?

>>11054505
PET is an acronym for positron emission tomography. A positron is an anti-electron

>>11054075
i stopped believing in quantum mechanics a while ago too

>>11054258
Speaking as an actual retard, yes it does.
>>11054302
Big bang is pseudoscience. Every time theories don't match reality they make up some new interaction that takes only 10^-122 seconds to save their theory then conveniently disappears so it doesn't have to fit any real data.

>>11054075
>Evidence for its existence is only ever present in fradulant and misleading abstract maths and erroneous experiments.
Uhhh.. they created anti-particles in the LHC, moron.
YOU HAVE TO GO BACK: >>>/b/

>>11054547
>i stopped believing in quantum mechanics a while ago too
Right about the same time you became and anti-vaxxer and started going to flat earth meetings?

>>11054595
>Big bang is pseudoscience.
After about a second it's all normal matter, for what it's worth.

>>11054062
Stucked somewhere in a big antimatter blackhole.

>>11054062
Is is possible to deny that antimatter is just regular matter travelling faster than light? (and essentially backwards in time)

>>11054604
Can you link me to the evidence?

>>11054595
>Every time theories don't match reality
Except that the Big Bang is extremely well verified. It the state of the universe before the big bang that is poorly constrained

>>11054075
what is beta-minus decay

>>11054507
not him but https://cms.cern/content/medical-imaging
Quite interesting.

we're sqrt 1, black holes are sqrt 0 and there's an anti matter universe sqrt -1, but it's basically the same.

>>11054062
Affleck-Dine mechanism

>>11054075
Did you just fail your QM exam anon?