[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 24 KB, 236x415, fb8888820287689370d71bd16e5b596b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11015145 No.11015145[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

How legal would be to pay for high IQ european semen and eggs and hire surrogate mothers to breed high IQ genius superior white people like a factory?

>> No.11015366

>>11015145
We already have this in the form of sperm banks, and guess what? The children of those banks are still low IQ because of environmental factors during developmental years (such as being raised by a single mom).

>> No.11015402

>>11015366
>cultural meme
IQ is 100% genetics.

only malnutrition can lower it while being a kid.

>> No.11015415

>>11015402
You sure about that, buddy?

https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Genetic-and-environmental-influences-on-human-Bouchard-Mcgue/5941daec6de7e3f11b7668336b26b03b9249d6b1

Also, even the demented James Watson admits that IQ is only 60% heritable.

>> No.11015422

>>11015415
you can only lower IQ, is impossible to raise it.

>> No.11015442

>>11015422
Yeah, no.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4684-2187-3_20

I've also noticed that you're just spewing bullshit without any evidence.

>> No.11015450

>>11015442
tell me again, how do blacks on the richest families still score lowest than the poorest whites from white trash families on the SAT.

>> No.11015468

>>11015450
(citation needed)

>> No.11015473

>>11015468
lurk more retard.

It's posted on every race and IQ thread on pol.

>> No.11015484

>>11015468
97% of anthropologists agree

>> No.11015489
File: 94 KB, 195x189, 1544095297931.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11015489

>>11015473
>JUST LOOK IT UP!!!

>> No.11015495

>>11015489
https://theracecardproject.com/poor-whites-score-higher-than-rich-blacks/

>> No.11015498

>>11015484
Okay, where's the survey?

>> No.11015521

>>11015495
>One sentence-long article.
>Just refrences wikipedia even though the wikipedia article doesn't even state it
Yeah, nice.
Look, until you get me a peer-reviewed study, you're outta here.

>> No.11015536
File: 34 KB, 1056x504, niggers are dumb.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11015536

>>11015521
the SAT scores are public knowledge retard.

>> No.11015566

>>11015536
>previously asserts that IQ is 100% genetic
>table itself shows that rich non-whites (hispanic and asian) score higher than poor whites
>just focuses on niggers and calls it a win.

>> No.11015577

>>11015566
>top 10% income only gets the same SAT as the bottom 10% of whites
asians are also smart, but they're manlets and dickless and physically weaker.

>> No.11015595

>>11015577
>>top 10% income only gets the same SAT as the bottom 10% of whites

The problem is that you previously asserted that IQ is **100**% genetic. If it was, then the rich spics and blacks should've scored just the same as the poor blacks and spics.

>> No.11015598

>>11015595
you can become smarter with study, but your IQ will be the same.

study != IQ

>> No.11015608

>>11015598
The SAT correlate almost perfectly with IQ. The fuck you talking about?