/sci/ - Science & Math

>inb4 south american hooker-chan

>>10983851
>King to B2

jai bhole ki

>>10983959
Vishnu cares not for pajeet-sp43k.

It is not l33t.

Yes, every audience member that identifies itself is ALWAYS describing itself as the first representative of an excludable set. That is the only thing people want to meet hte GOD OF TIME for.

So they know that them, and all the people they can identify with their imagination/thoughts in that moment, can be excluded from anything that the GOD OF TIME wants/has/must/will do.

That includes sexual activities to any that want it, or bring to me.

~Solivagus~

I am the Original Male Slut, ego and identity combined.

The truest incarnation of Time!

Oh, I get to invent the meme-clock cycle. Cool.

Well, if it doesn't involve someone inconspicuously and casually performing some sexual act in the background without fear of being observed then I'm out.

Oh, and yes, I'm trying to show you all that science/religion/spirituality are all, literally, the same thing according to Language.

So many of you pricks just take the first ego boost powerup you find and go mental with it.

We live in the Singularity, you fucking retards. The Ego Singularity, called TIME. It's MY EGG-O!

I'm the only individual human that is allowed to give you all EGO POWERUPS, but you IDIOTS have to realize that ALL HUMANS WILL GET THEM.

I HAVE LITERALLY BEEN TRYING TO HOLD BACK TEH AMOUNT OF RAPE HUMANS ARE GOING TO DO TO THE GODS THIS WHOLE TIME, TOP SCIENTISTS TOO, so those that keep taking the ego stick I hope you are all getting the point now.

I'm immune, because I commune EXCLUSIVELY. I have to LIVE in your conversations of exclusion because that is how, in MY SINGULARITY, you all need to be saved. Only if someone advertises ardent exclusion or demands inclusion can I go, "Cool, you're in. Ya gotta teach us how to make slut-men as well as slut-women."

>Sure, whatever 4chan. I'm not going to call them sissy-men though. You faggot humans wanted to go THIS far? Then TRUE MALE SLUTS are now UNICORN SLUTS and TRUE FEMALE SLUTS are DRAGON SLUTS.

*logs this conversation for review by relevant legal council, in accordance with the language we've allowed to matriculate through the legal pathways of Aboriginal Australian Law and English.

yeah but how come the RH is disproven for like 30 months now and Clay still lists it as unsolved?
And Wikipedia?
And Wolfram?
And everywhere else you can find it mentioned as an important problem?

>>10984266
Because they are the uninteresting representations of the problem? Arbitrary limits and boundaries assuming that mathematicians required money to ever do their work in the first place?

>>10984269
No, I think it's more like the powers that be in the world have been telling the lie that pic related is me and if they acknowledge that I did something good then it will make their house of lies collapse.

I certainly agree that I have seemed socially retarded in my life. Everyone else says, "It's easy to get a gf just assume the inferior social position and pretend to be a chihuahua running in circles around her and yapping incessantly. DUH!"

The thing about that is, as bad as I have wanted that gf, I don't want to do the chihuahua thing, and I want the woman to assume the inferior social and for me to assume the superior role. So... since it was always my goal to work hard to make it to a point in life where I can force myself in the superior role, it makes their house of lies of lies that I am simply retarded fall apart when my long term plan went exactly as I always envisioned it would. The only thing that went wrong in the plan is that I didn't expect the whole world to conspire to ignore my many great discoveries. However, my enemies have orchestrated exactly that because it is required for their narrative that I'm retarded.

>>10984309
You've just described everyone's story, from all angles of perspective.

Yours is not an isolated story, Tooker. It's the same as everyone's to some epsilon, this much you must know.

I post here because eventually humans have to compress their own bullshit and swallow it, me too. Otherwise the memory cycle of 'the forgotten one' or 'the lost one' or 'the unheeded one' will continue, when really it is just the memory cycle of the 'slut communicator'.

Yes, Time is for Sluts, EXCLUSIVELY. Tooker is a slut for attention, but he uses the dimensions of anger and mathematics, which is, quite frankly, not where mathematics needs to go.

>I discovered number! I get to kill!

No, you get to communicate with other humans now Tooker.

>Reabsorbs Tooker's essence into God's Divine Form.

Enjoy your day!

>>10984328
No, you're wrong and stupid. Even if everyone would like to be in the superior position, almost everyone fails to do the things required to force themselves into it. I did succeed, and then you all conspired to pretend like I didn't succeed, and due to the social construction of reality, from the perspective of the women who I would force into the inferior position with my fame, money, and success, I failed totally. You are wrong and what you wrote just inane.

>>10984351
Everytime you write 'and then', you being your path in a new dimension. Maybe reign in your own powers of creation their Tooker instead of CREATING that reality and then punishing it for existing in the first place?

>Tooker is an incel, I'm not an incel. Wife and kid kind of attest to that reality.

It's not even for sluts either. I would like to get married to several very good looking women and have children with them. The kind of women I'm interested in probably don't anything to do with a broke loser, and certainly they don't want anything to do with a broke loser who isn't going to run in circles at their feet and yap incessantly.

Like... what man is going to sell me his beautiful daughter if I can't give him at least 400 goats?

And every year they fuck me out of my accolades, that another year of my youth that I could have spent with my children, but now I can't because they fucked me out of it while they're stealing my sperm so their own sons can enjoy the superiority of my semen by buying my semen to impregnate their wives from whoever is harvesting my semen without my consent and then keeping that money for themselves while I maintain my permanent state of indigence.

There was an implicit social contract that I saw in society in 1980s and 1990s, and certainly that I saw in college in the 2000s, that if I did something great then it would be acknowledged and praised. However, the secret truth is that everything I could have ever tried to do was doomed to fail from the beginning because my enemies guarantee it, and my only hope to escape their wickedness is biblical intervention.

>>10984364
Okay, so you wish at some point for women to be able to extract resources from you when you separate.

>>10984370
Why don't you just come over for dinner and avail yourself to my daughter? If you need her for a period of time to breed a woman, that's okay, but at some future point you have to provide one female for me to perform the same in order to sanctify the deal.

Breeding cycles can be done in 7 year increments, in order to secure the female imprint on the bio-spawn.

>>10984395
Tooker's attention is fucking hilarious. God's personal Rage Jester!

So what % of /sci/ posters are schizophrenic, would you reckon?

>>10984415
What % of communicators contain schizophrenic interpretations, would I reckon?

>>10984408
Because Love cucked tooker.

>>10984428
No, Time cucked Tooker. Love is the ultimate cuck, but if you cuck as a group or as an identified pairing (bf/gf) then Time treats you as Love and you're equal at that moment forever more.

>>10984408
>Why don't you just come over for dinner and avail yourself to my daughter?
It's because I'm broke, I don't have a car to even get to your house, I don't want to tell her, "I'm actually a super genius but it's a secret no one knows because of the government conspiracy," and certainly I have no way to support a family, and certainly I have no way to support a family amply which is the only condition under which I would ever consider starting a family.

>>10984424
Not reading my book though are you, pic related? I'd wager it's better than the one your meme is reading there.

>>10984428
>>10984441
Stalling the ordinary scientific proceeding of the whole word for 10 years has nothing to do with cuckoldry. The fact is, if anyone else wrote that paper I wrote about RH, it would have earned heaps of praise, but the powers that be fuck me over specifically because they prefer for their own sons to enjoy the superiority of my semen by getting those sons' wives pregnant with my semen while they continue to force this indigence on me.

>>10984424
Also... is she opening her legs because she's interested or is she opening her legs like the last one because she wants to tell everyone I'm a creep? I don't like like getting told no, and it hurts, severely, and I have no reasonable expectation that any woman would ever say yes to me due to my 100% strikeout rate.

>>10984488
>my book though are you, pic related?

>>10984441
So I should have killed myself with my imaginary friend.

>>10984488
Why would I CHARGE you MONEY to FUCK AND/OR BREED MY DAUGHTERS?! Supporting one of my daughters is literally just give them attention, they'll whore themselves out for you or whatever else if that's your bag.

>Yes, I'm reading YOUR Book, Tooker.

Yes, some humans like for 'their chosen one' to win the 'big shiny-shiny command stick' too.

>Why would she ever store any memory of you where you were unwanted? She would not store methods of functions of expression that would tell others that you were not worthy of inclusion in everything she was also party to. She doesn't have to say no, but if you do anything that desynchronizes her (i.e. kill her) then she'll just return to me, her Creator.

>>10984491
No, I am your imaginary friend trying to show you how to help everyone else kill themselves, memetically speaking (as in memoized redaction processes, distributed in parallel).

>>10984490
Baiame is the weather, I am the vein of this Land. Tooker is the author of the story he observes.

>>10984499
>Tooker is the author of the story he observes.
You're wrong. It's the women who write their lines, "Eww, no. With you? Gross." I don't write those lines.

>>10984507
Neither did I. Strange. Ah, the third silent author NWY. Tooker enjoys aggression, so some of my daughters I send him throw up weak walls. I authorize him to rape, but he will be the only male I authorize to rape because my daughters will tame his anger eventually.

>>10984507
And it's the conspiracy of my enemies that leads to a social construction of reality wherein the women think the best line for them to recite is, "With you? No way!" If I was rich, or even if I was simply a modestly employed scientist known to be one of the best in the world, if not the single best one, then they would choose different dialogue for themselves, by and large. I might still get turned down, but I don't think I would be on a 5+ year losing streak of getting turned down by every women NO MATTER HOW OVERWHELMINGLY POSITIVE her body language seemed to me in the moments leading up to, "With you? No way!" No one likes getting turned down, but the fact that my strikeout rate is literally 100% makes it a lot worse for me than for normies. It really sucks.

>>10984528
Then why let their words, written or spoken, limit your behavior or chosen divine course of action?

>>10984531
>why let their words, written or spoken, limit
Are you fucking retarded? I let it limit because I want to woman to say, "Yes," when I say, "Do you want to go out with me?," but when they say, "No," that is not what I want, and the whole point of asking is because I wanted them to say yes.

>>10984531
Please know that I will kill you later if I can, and your family.

>do you have AAA batteries here?
>no
Why let that limit you?

You fucking miserable retard.

>>10984541
Okay, so you just want FEMALE = YES. That's a slut, that's what my daughter's are. Fantastic, we're getting somewhere.

>>10984543
I don't mind, but that is usually a yearly event because there are so many of you little God type humans running around that need some sort of catharsis moment. Are you okay if it doesn't actually, ya know, permanently kill us? Promise not to rub it in your followers faces and everything.

>>10984545
Why would you refer to a material object when language is involved?

>>10984546
I don't agree that only sluts agree to go out with men. I am going to kill you for your deliberate stupidity.

>>10984554
If you want a FEMALE OR MALE that ONLY RESPONDS WITH AN EAGER AFFIRMATION, WITH NO CAPACITY TO SAY NO TO THE REQUESTER/QUERENT, THEN THAT IS A SLUT.

*sigh* What am I not getting here? What the fuck is getting killed? What does that even mean for Tooker to think that it is somehow a context addition that aids in progressing the narrative?