/sci/ - Science & Math

Go to bed, Tooker

>>10939811
I keep doing that. Doesn't really do anything. Seems like my 3641st night of sleep isn't going to change anything.

>>10939795
Tell me about this model, I have enough familiarity with the applied terminology and mathematics to intuit some of what you are saying, but help me understand it in more laymans terms. You're saying that the universe is being gravitationally lensed by another universe, right?
Like, the universe is immersed inside of another universe, and the the phenomena of inflation and dark energy are explained by the constructive interference between gravitational waves generated between the two universes? Makes sense to me

Shut up Tooker

>>10940300
I saved my image too.

Thank you for having the balls to say something that isn't 100% approved narrative. You're a cautionary tale about the futility of opposing the Federal reserve banking cartel. It doesn't matter if you're right or wrong, the fact is (((they))) obviously don't like your bounce theory too much.

>>10940314
That doesn't change the fact that you don't know how to compute a limit

>>10940293
>You're saying that the universe is being gravitationally lensed by another universe, right?
Kind of. Lensing happens between an object and an image so I don't think there's any universes doing gravitational lensing inside out own universes. I see something kind of like lensing in my own idea but I don't call it that because then someone's going to say, "What about the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect?!?!? Even a kindergartner would know about it! You shouldn't talk about lensing if you don't know it." Since I am not even strong in classical optics, much less galactic optics, I don't get too much into the lenses. I will make a blurb about pic related, the main result which I tried to publish 3641 days ago on arXiv. (I also give a nice treatment to this figure here
>The Truth About Geometric Unity
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1307.0075
and Section 4.1 here too
>The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1712.0598))

Here is why I am so upset about not getting my science accolade over this: my solution to dark energy is the only that makes sense. Everyone says, "The data shows expansion," and "Spacetime is 4D," and they also say, "Expanding 3D space makes no sense!!!" Expanding time, MY IDEA (or contraction depending on the sign), solves all the problems. I will construct the solution carefully now.

>>10939795
the amazon reviews for that book are hilarious

Consider the data which led Pauli to postulate the existence of the neutrino. He was doing his particle experiments and adding up the momenta and it didn't come out right. He said, "There must be a little neutral particle (neutrino) taking this momentum out of my detector." Then a few years later, they confirmed Pauli's theory that momentum is conserved.

Similarly, I have found some missing momentum in the big bang, and it should be no surprise to anyone that the BB does not conserve momentum because it is so obvious. However, I never heard it mentioned anywhere in school and I noticed it independently because it is very obvious. First think about the BB in 3D: all the stuff moving left cancels the momentum of the stuff moving right, and up/down and front/back too. From the idea of a "ball" of fire, it is very to easy how the universe conserves 3-momentum at the BB.

However, there is some theorem, the ADM theorem, that says any universe in which time goes forward has to have positive energy. The energy is the zero-component of the 4-momentum. Since all the left floating galaxies exactly balance with the right-floating ones etc, the 1,2,3- components of the 4-momentum are all easy to make zero but the ADM theorem messes up the 0-component of the relativistic 4-momentum.

Where did this small increment of 4-momentum come from? Why is momentum after the BB different than the momentum before (which was zero since momentum did not exist yet.) Just like Pauli, I say another particle has to take this momentum away. Then I model the BB as a particle/anti-particle creation event.

>>10940338
Oh I see why people get away with fucking with you so much. You're one of those people who actually believes in more than 3 spatial dimensions. You're not saying the universe is immersed inside of another universe, you're saying the universe is superimposed on an identical universe that exists in the same space volume, and has an inverse time coefficient.
Does that pretty much sums it up?

>>10940359
>However, there is some theorem, the ADM theorem, that says any universe in which time goes forward has to have positive energy.
No, it says that it has "no negative energy", that includes the zero (which is flat space-time).

>>10940359
Mills had a similar line of reasoning, that there needs to be another particle to describe dark matter so that energy is conserved. He has all but proven that dark matter is hydrinos and that dark energy is just hydrinos converting directly into radiation. Interstellar dust is not a terrible way of putting it.

Here is where it gets to what you call lensing. For some reason, the two universe move away from each other and do not form one universe. It is still an open question whether anti-matter anti-gravitates, I think, and that might cause the two universe to separate. However, since spacetime is Lorentzian rather than Euclidean, the 4D object is a hypercone rather than a tesseract, and the two opposite arrows of time from the momentum argument should be sufficient to separate the two nascent universes.

Since the two universes were very close together at first, and the total energy is zero, the one universe never leaves the gravitational well of the other universe. Because there is no space in the bulk region around the BB where the pointy bottoms of the two, the entirety of the interaction must be transmitted through the point of tangency. Therefore, the effect of gravity on one universe can modeled by a point mass having the mass of the other universe and placed at the apex of the cone. (The 3D part of a hypercone is ball that gets bigger as the 4th dimension increases so that is the 3D part of the universe growing with time)

Here's where the details get a little slim, but that point mass is supposed to be generating the Newtonian gravitational well in which observers in the present are drawn in more quickly than images of events in the past. Where the details get absolutely rock solid is here: no matter what the mechanism is, you can plug in the real astronomical data and do a curve fit for the energy curve I have drawn in the figure.

My statement, "You can fit this curve to the original data, and that will give you an observable constraint on the universe," is nearly Nobel-worthy. Usually the person who actually fits the curve gets the Nobel, and it some fuck you to me that no one has done that for 10 years. I guess it is good that if someone did that that they would have to say, "That's Tooker's idea," but it is also bad because means, "It's better to pretend like we don't know that than to praise Tooker for showing it to us." Even without the Nobel, this single statement of mine should have been enough to make my career, and it is more insight than 99% of physicists have in their entire careers.

>>10940388
>It is still an open question whether anti-matter anti-gravitates
No, it's not open, anti-matter gravitates like regular matter. The mass of the positron is well known and positive.

>>10940391
All truth passes through three stages.
First it is ridiculed,
Then it is attacked savagely,
Then it is taken as self evident.
It's not anyone's fault, people are just dumb as rocks. Your curve fit is dope, but you lose points in interpretation.

>>10940386
rofl hydrinos

>>10940400
I'm too based to let petty heckling deter my line of reasoning. You'll need to step up your game to an actual argument, which I know already you don't have.

>>10940341
I hope you buy it an leave a better one. Those other two people seemed to have only commented to say what my English name is.

>>10940360
>Does that pretty much sums it up?
No. That's completely wrong. The spatial volume of the two universes are never in contact. The universes are in contact at the big bang, but the volume of space is still zero there.

>>10940393
I agree that the mass is positive but to my knowledge no one has ever ruled out by experiment anti-gravitation. In fact, I thought this was a goal at one of the current muon experiments, or an anti-hydrogen experiment. They may have did the experiment by now, I haven't been keeping up with it. Does anti-hydrogen fall if you release it? I don't remember if this was answered.

>>10940359
Time + dark energy = 0?

Or am i completely misinterpreting

>>10940419
Where are the two universes in relation to each other and what is their shape? How are they not in contact if they are exchanging momentum?

Imagine what it would feel like to go into remission and realize you've wasted ten years of your life homeless and insane
If Tooker ever gets proper treatment he's gonna end up depressed as fuck

As I said in my previous post, due to the Lorentzian spacetime metric instead of the Euclidean one, the universe is a 4D hypercone instead of a 4D tesseract. Usually when people think "4D" they try to imagine a tesseract, but the universe is not Euclidean. It is a hypercone.

When you say "universes touching" I think you mean the 3D space part of the universes. A hypercone is like an ice cream cone where the scoop of ice cream gets bigger as you go farther up the cone. This means that the volume of all of space was small back by the BB and it only gets bigger as you move away from the BB.

In 4D, the two ice cream cones touch at their bottom points, but the two 3D scoops of ice cream never come into contact. It is by forcing the gravitational interaction through the point at the bottom of the ice cream cone that I can conclude, "This effect must be uniform and homogeneous with respect 3-space in the other universe."

>>10939795
TOOKER why do you always post when I'm in public? Come on man, have some mercy.

>>10940439
Don't be a dick dude, he's not insane. Why don't you contribute something meaningful to the discussion instead of simply harassing the poor guy? Say what it is you disagree with, make your argument or please just fuck off.

>>10940449
Bless you, my child

>>10940449

>>10940444
Wasted digits.
How cruel God was to make you so naive as to think that the universe is a 4D hypercone. There is literally no evidence for spatial dimensions exceeding the classical 3. The Laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory has placed the last nail in the coffin for the existence of hyperdimensional space. The observable universe is expanding, that doesn't mean that everything in it is shrinking, it means they are getting farther apart.

>>10940455
Don't thank me yet, I'm not done dissecting your entire life's work.

>>10940459
Ah yes... I had been squatting in that abandoned house after being homeless for a long time. When the cops showed up, I did not open the door for them. Then they sent SWAT to knock the whole house over. These charges from this police violence were not indicted. Pretty good picture too. If they do this to me for another ten years, what will I look then? Extreme chronic stress that Helene signs her name to as "harm-free care" is really fucking up my body, and it will send me to an early grave if nothing changes. Stress is just unhealthy all around, and this team of stalkers is keep my cortisol levels UP!!!! You can see how badly just these two years affected my body. Hopefully I will kill them before they kill me.

That's the crux of it where we are now: I've got killing on my mind but the people who've had their eyes closed for these last few years, apparently, want more love and tenderness and mercy and PC religiosity in my rhetoric which they only hear through the surveillance that I absolutely FORBID! I'm not so loaded with that positive stuff right now that it's making it into my monologue. My promise is that I will do all of that stuff with the people who make it into the remnant, but everyone who knows they aren't going to make into the remnant is going to say, "No we turned him evil! He is evil now and his love doesn't endure forever, and actually he was evil along and we just knew it better than you did and that's why we've been doing all this plain heresy because he know better and only trust ourselves." What they did is make me very angry, and that's the main thing on mind lately, and I don't plan to ever get over it. When I'm done killing them, I will do all those nice things and say all those kind words on the ground where I watched them die.

>>10940501
So you're just going to let them MK Ultra you into a psychotic killer, huh? What a bitch. If you really care about your ego more than your ideals, maybe you are just an idolater like the rest of these normal fags. Don't you see that is exactly what they want from you?

>>10940461
>There is literally no evidence for spatial dimensions exceeding the classical 3
yes, the fourth dimension is "temporal" rather than spatial.

>>10940479
Oh, I hope you didn't mean, "Don't make obviously wrong nothing-arguments about technical minutiae when you can help us put together the new dossier which will say, 'He can't be God because he is full of wrath,' instead of, 'He can't be God because he's a fag,' like the last one." If you think you have good material now, just keep hitting me with these anal rape implants a dozen times a day for the next few years and I'll probably blow your socks off with how angry I get. How many dossiers will these people out? Since they know they will not make it into the remnant, nor their children, I am confident they will always make another dossier.

>>10940516
Take a step outside, do some deep breathing, count to one thousand, and come back to this discussion. I have no fucking clue what you are even trying to communicate, other than that you are upset.
When you come back, you can define temporal.

>>10940514
Culling the wicked was always my ideal. I have never been anti-violence. I was in the Marines, btw, and I trained jiu jitsu, a killing art, for 15 years. What ideals do you think I've betrayed? I used to be very anti-torture, but now I am much less so. Is that what you mean? Do you think I need to requote the entire dialogue of Jesus Christ every time I open my mouth just to assure people, people who are probably not going to make it since they're on surveillance detail, that I'm more into hippie Jesus than almighty God?

OR DO YOU THINK that I, me: the man Jon, is going to ruin all the plans of Heaven by rambling at home alone and that turning into a big PR moment for the wicked to say, "Oh he hates us and wants to kill us! That doesn't sound like God to me!," and then the whole world is like, "Yeah! If he wants to be God then he has to promise not to say mean things."

The present day is not the fun part of the story of my life. You are wrong to look for the fun part of my message here.

Rest easy ye faithful of mine: the darkness did not overcome me!

>>10940543
Do you seriously think you are a god?

>>10940543
But listen hear ye faithful of mine, the light shines in the darkness but the shroud of time encroaches on all things. I am quite certain that my body will one day die, so I strongly prefer that you praise my name in public today instead of waiting for my enemy to give the go ahead on that.

And speaking to time devouring all things: one thing that the shroud of time does not encroach is closed timelike curves. These are the paths of spacetime along which time travelers brought from the future into the past the religious prophecies foretelling my coming, appearance, and final victory, and also foretelling the plenty, justice, and equity of my kingdom. These curves are immutable.

So, as much as I say, "I am God," don't forget that I am Jon. These retards in the deep state who think they are playing 4D chess with me don't realize that they are playing 4D chess with God the Father, and they are no match for him because he can see everything they do, and I just sitting here, sharpening my knife as it were.

>>10940564
I am a human man. My English name Jonathan is to my nickname Jon as my Hebrew name would be to a nickname God. So... I am God as much as I am Jon. It is a fact. You ask if I am "a" god. By that do you mean "not human?"

Man you are one sick fuck

Jon I love how in every thread you make you manage to string along a couple of newfags only to lose them as you go deeper into your lore about being God.

However, with how horrible the world is I would not be surprised if God was unironically some rambling schizophrenic who fell out of academia for sexually harassing two girls. That actually sounds exactly like what God would be to create this horrible world. Godspeed Jon. You know, I wish you no harm. I actually hope one day you can recover from poverty as no one deserves to suffer. I hope you'll get healthy. And I hope that Gary will one day leak the nudes of his wife.

>>10940814
>string along a couple of newfags
Yeah no kidding. I went to the doctor to complain about my anal implants, and he called my school to say that in his opinion as a proctologist, I am a schizo, and he told the chief medical officer to contact the behavioral specialist about it. Indeed, even though we never talked about suicide or homicide while I complaining about my problem, he told them that I "denied" begin suicidal or homicidal. So I imagine one or two of those guys will be sniffing around my internet presence's asshole. It was probably the one who said he was glad to be awake.

>>10940814
>lore about being God.
What is it? I would like to know. The only thing I have is that it's my name. What are they saying?

>That actually sounds exactly like what God would be to create this horrible world.
What parts of the world do you ascribe to Satan and God's other enemies? They get the good parts and everything evil is what God cooked up?

>>10940858
Tooker I don't follow. Your doctor called your school? What school do you belong to?

Anyways, I'm glad you followed my advice from like a month ago regarding going to the doctor to check your anal pains. Stay safe Tooker.

>>10940814
>gary
Don't bring that ineffectual nigger up, this the LORD'S thread.

Is this guy a troll or is he actually insane? I'm quite new to /sci/ and he only seems to post on this board, and after having seen like 50 of these threads i don't know what to think about this anymore

>>10941044
Please stop posting furries. This is a kid friendly board.

>>10941054
Yes

>>10941054
Sadly he is actually insane. I think it's already proven beyond any doubt that he is schizophrenoc, and we know he isn't a character due to IRL events like his arrest. Just enjoy the show.

>>10941057
Fuck you i want to get spoonfed.

>>10940814
>who fell out of academia for sexually harassing two girls
Sauce on this?

>>10941065
Yes he is. Quick rundown: he lives outside of Atlanta, Georgia. He went to college for physics or engineering and actually was employed as some kind of engineer for a short while before getting fired. I do not believed he ever finished his degree either. He believes he has solved the Reimann hypothesis and also is dead-set convinced the world is conspiring against him. Oh, and he thinks is mother Helene is the spearhead of this conspiracy, and the origin of his anal implants (?). He believes he is God too. He's kinda like Terry Davis.

Pls buy his book btw, maybe Ill get that kiss.
>>10941056
No

>>10941080
>and the origin of his anal implants
No I think it was that tall guy who came in at the end: the mutant alien pretending to be a young and healthy man.

>>10941277
So how'd I do?

>>10941063
Is there any validity to his theory ?

>>10941295
No. He thinks sin and cosine converge to a limit at infinity.

>>10941295
I don't know about his physics cause I'm not a physicist but I read his entire RH paper and pointed out to him the errors. They are not completely basic, but you'd expect a guy with PhD studies under his belt to be better than that. If his RH papers are anything to go by, he is completely incompetent as a researcher and his theories are likely garbage.

>>10941295
>validity

>>10941308
>validity

V A L I D I T Y
A
L
I
D
I
T
Y

>>10941308
>>10941311
>>10941313
What is the limit of sine at infinity? How about cosine?

>>10939795
Our quality of life doesn't seem to correlate with yours. Is this an issue for you, and if so, how can we remedy it? I don't really want to read the whole paper but I don't want to insult you by requesting a TL;DR on 4chan if that would be upsetting in any way. I like to entertain ideas so please don't respond to me if you aren't comfortable with me being prepared to accept that you may be wrong, or to have employed fallacious reasoning at some point.

The limit of sine, I believe I have proven, is zero and the limit of cosine is one. The limits at infinity are the same as the limits at the origin, if my proof is devoid of any unfixable errors, which I believe it is. I have a section called, "Refutation of proof of non-existence of limits of sine and cosine at infinity." If you are familiar with that proof, then you may find this section insightful.

Proof of the Limits of Sine and Cosine at Infinity
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1809.0234

>>10941324
I don't know who the "our" is that you mention as uncorrelated. More than 90% of my main personal problems can be cured with money, and if you will buy my book, then I will be really glad to make that $4 off of you. Also, it is a really great book that I think you will enjoy if you like fiction, and its spine will look good gathering dust on any bookshelf.

You say you don't want to read the whole paper, but is only eight paragraphs and very short. I encourage you to read it if you are very well-versed in the cosmology jargon. It's really so short, there is no way to TLDR it. The TLDR I wrote for the other guy earlier was practically longer than the paper. I post my papers because I am always hoping that someone can point out real technical flaws. I do not make these threads to invite insults and shit-flinging, I do it because honest criticism is invaluable, and I have corrected my own errors very many times based on the feedback I've gotten between the retards spamming my serious posts with their idiocy.

Most of my physics paper have a lot of my opinion about directions forward in them, but lately I switched research direction from phys to math. I have the paper above and this other very strong paper, very scholarly in the usual style, and I would welcome anyone to read criticism them.

Real Numbers in the Neighborhood of Infinity
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1811.0222

>>10941373
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1809.0234
infinity isn't a fugging number.

>>10941373
>Real Numbers in the Neighborhood of Infinity
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1811.0222

>>10941373
If you've proven that then infinity is a finite, irrational number divisible by tau.

>>10941393
It is a number. It's not a real number. You know how "i" is a number but it's not a real number? Infinity is like that.

>>10940858
wait.... anal rape implants? please go on...

>>10941413
It has to be real if the limit of sine is zero at infinity

>>10941400
Damn... that's quite the game changer, I always knew Tooker would accomplish something glorious.

>>10941400
I see the loose framework of the argument you make there but if you actually prove that my proof "implies that INFINITY is finite" then I will have a look and try to find an error. If I can prove that infinity is finite, then I think I know the title of my next paper!

>>10941419
I see you have made a claim but I do not see that you have supported it.

>>10941426
I need to know, is the limit of sine at infinity+pi/2 1 or -1?

>>10941428
Well I guess it could also be a multiple of (tau)(xi) and therefore a complex number, but it would still have to be finite. That's just periodicity of sine and cosine.

>>10941431
fug, never mind, I figured it out on my own, it obviously has to be 1 due to the lim of cosine at inf being 1

>>10941432
(tau)i, rather. I'm a little baked.

>>10941373
Thanks for putting the TL;DR at the top. It's nice to be able to read things on 4chan and not have to go off-site to get the information that could as well just be embedded in the thread.

>>10940391
Now that I better understand the issue, your intuitive reasoning is correct; reasoning about space at the moment that space is created tells us a lot about the limit of our intuitions. I'm not qualified to weigh in on the curve fitting or tell if others are or not, so if you say it fits I have to believe you. What I can say was that it was non-obvious to parse your meaning, and I do think that it's entirely possible that most of the people that ended up reading your paper didn't really get it. It's fairly common among academics to consult with other knowledgeable academics to understand a new concept, so if you haven't been mingling to explain the details to others, then it's possible that people just didn't get it.

Peer review requires peers, and while I can get your meaning, I'm not a peer in the critical sense of being able to independently verify the curve.

As far as I can tell, what you're saying is that all others who have reasoned about the big bang failed to account for a zero-space in the unfolding of one of the early cosmogenic eons, and because of this they fail to account for an obvious spacial inversion and assuming dark matter/energy is randomly distributed across the universe when there literally isn't any notion of conceptible space for it to distribute across. If this appears to be a correct interpretation to you, then I'd encourage you to see what you can do to help people bridge the conceptual gap with ever-more approximate TL;DR's.

>>10941432
>>10941444
Actually, I was right the first time, it's a multiple of tau. The i would rotate it another 90 degrees. I might be more baked than I thought.

>>10941431
Well... if the derivative of sine is cosine, and cosine is one at infinity, then that leads to me to guess that sine is increasing at infinity. Therefore, my guess is that
sin(inf+pi/2) = sin(pi/2)

>>10941432
Infinite means not finite though

>>10941447
>What I can say was that it was non-obvious to parse your meaning, and I do think that it's entirely possible that most of the people that ended up reading your paper didn't really get it.
Yes, this is a very good criticism. The intended audience for this paper was professional subject matter experts familiar with the LQC and Twistor talks I had contemporaneously attended. Since I have been barred from communicating with subject matter experts by my inability to find even peer-review that I might fail, I have made a lot more effort to write for a more general audience lately.

>the big bang failed to account for a zero-space
Yes, exactly. You are very smart. Even taking the inflationary epoch back to 10^{-35} seconds crops this space. However, my main criticism of them not noticing is that they didn't notice the missing momentum whose effect I have modeled as a point mass in the 0-space. The 0-space is a just a simplifier.

TLDR You can extract a dark energy "E" function directly from the original Nobel observations in the late 1990s. Trying to put this function in space somewhere doesn't work, but if you use this exact function to define the energy landscape along time, then it will exactly replicate the dark energy spectrum (trivially) and there will not be any more mysteries about "Why is there dark energy," and "Why doesn't the big bang conserve momentum?" Usually to explain a big mystery in physics, we introduce a new smaller mystery somewhere else. By adding an energy function E(t), we solve two big mysteries, don't introduce any new mysteries, and then also solve like five more pretty big mysteries. The only mystery remaining is, "Why do they pretend like this solution doesn't exist?"

>>10941513
>Infinite means not finite though
Then there's a contradiction in your proof.

>>10939795
I'm sorry but I really just have to ask, what is TIMESAND?

TLDR: This paper was dank as fuck and still is, and what I wrote in it easily should have made my whole career as a physicist.
>Modified Spacetime Geometry Addresses Dark Energy, Penrose's Entropy Dilemma, Baryon Asymmetry, Inflation and Matter Anisotropy
>http://www.vixra.org/abs/1302.0022

>>10941513
>The only mystery remaining
As I said, I believe that they're not pretending it doesn't exist, they just don't know what it means. Merely submitting a paper does not ensure peer-review. There needs to be at least one other person who really grasps what you're saying before it can matter.

If you wanted to do something to make it obvious to people, you could create a webpage that shows how the various models explain the data under different types of momentum. From there, it's trivial to show that the curve matches when the spacial distribution factor is zero.

>>10941517
Maybe if you start making mathematical arguments I will be more interested in trying to discern the contradiction you're suggesting.

>>10941532
>it easily should have made my whole career
hey, whose read Higgs' paper lately, pic related? Yes! That's the whole thing there in the pic. You know that name "Higgs" that's been getting named dropped 100 times a day for decades? It comes from this page and a half here. That's how careers are made. You can see that Higgs did the quantification which I deliberately avoided. However, to support the notion of my lost career that shoulda woulda and coulda, let me explain the steps I would take to quantify.

(1) Get the Dark Energy original data.
(2) Copy by manual data entry a few dozen numbers into MS Excel.
(3) Use MS Excel "plot series" and "fit curve" to get the E(t) implied
(4) Propose implied E(t) as real E(t)
(5) Demonstrate that source in 0-space acts uniformly over all of 3-space
(6) Use the Doppler formula to compute the expected red shift on the various surfaces of constant proper time
(7) Do an integral over all of space or something to show that something does explode by adding the 0-space
(8) Delete everything else from the paper except dark energy.

>>10939795
Tooker, have you considered travelling to a third world country? Not only are whores cheaper here (and some will even let you in raw), it may also be a chance to restart your life.

>>10941581
>who really grasps what you're saying before it can matter.
For this reason, I believe I have been segregated from the other educated people I could discuss it with. I am excited about going back to school soon. If I could get this part of my life moving back in a good direction, then that would be really great.

HOWEVER!!!! It is my contention that this person Wetterich has read my paper, totally understood it, and then basically copied it in a way that should have gotten a citation or acknowledgement.
>A Universe without expansion
>https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6878

Where I have said, "Attach the energy function to time, he wrote 'attach it to the mass.'" Changing time with constant mass and changing mass with constant time are the exact same thing. If I was going to write this paper today, I would attach his function to "t" instead of "m" and then spend the rest of paper saying, "Wetterich offers no reason why mass might change but actually we should expect that time changes..."

I feel slighted that Wetterich didn't at least acknowledge me but I don't claim that his use of my idea rises to the level of unethical activity. I am glad he wrote that paper, and I hope he would admit using my paper as a source of inspiration. However, in the book I wrote about my research program, the aside in section 3 is totally dedicated to the paper trail of those who have unethically fucked me. THERE IS A LOT OF EVIDENCE OF UNETHICAL ACTIVITY!!!!

>>10941641
Tooker, where I live for 80 bucks you can get an 18 year old white girl for 1 hour. And my country is one of the most expensive. In Cuba I got a blonde for 30 bucks. Dude just fucking come to any third world country. You can go to mexico by car. Do it man, get the pussy you deserve.

>>10941612
I don't want to restart my life. I want to get people to acknowledge that I had a very good scientific idea, a truly remarkable one, back in 2009. This work I did in graduate school should have made my career if the ordinary scientific proceedings were advancing normally. However, they have been advancing abnormally since at least 2009, and I suspect that the USA government would like to see them continue to advance abnormally for the remainder of my natural life, and that the USA agents will use their money stranglehold over all things scientific to do exactly that, if they are able.

>>10941665
Ok then don't restart your life. Just come get some pussy. Women are cheap here.

>>10939795
>>10939811
>>10939926
>>10940293
>>10940300
>>10940314
>>10940332
>>10940336
>>10940338
>>10940341
>>10940359
>>10940360>>10940386
>>10940388
>>10940391
>>10940398
>>10940400
>>10940403
>>10940419

samefag schizo

>>10941584
>the contradiction you're suggesting.
You suggested it, actually.

If the limit of sine at infinity is 0 and real numbers are continuous, then infinity is some number equal to sin(0 +/- a(tau)) where a is an integer. Tau is a real, irrational number and a is a real, rational number so the product of the two is a real, irrational number. Furthermore all integers are finite numbers and the product of a finite number and a finite number is a finite number, so infinity must also be a finite number.

So if our assumptions are correct then infinity is a real, finite, irrational number that is divisible by tau. Because this contradicts the definition of infinity there is a contradiction either in my proof (there's not, it's all definitions), or the assumptions of my proof. My assumptions were 1) real numbers are continuous, 2) periodicity of sin is a valid property, and 3) your proof of the limit of sine at infinity is correct. 1 and 2 are pretty solid, so unless you can prove otherwise that means your proof contains a contradiction.

Don't forget to like and subscribe to my channel.

>>10941683
>equal to sin(0 +/- a(tau))
Oops. That should just be 0+/- a(tau)

>>10941641
That abstract doesn't read to me like he's using your idea. The thing to be careful about here is that the more close we appear to approach a theory of everything, the more likely multiple different ways of reasoning about the problem are to end up producing very similar predictions.

For Wetterich, it sounds like he's looking at a similar space of reasoning, but didn't notice the curve-fitting that you noted. There is likely a discrete correlation between your models, but it is only a correlation. It doesn't appear to me that he's processing the implications of his model the same that you're processing the implications of your model. His reasoning is divergent, and doesn't note the fit for the dark curve.

>>10941663
>get the pussy you deserve.
I see the missing accolade I deserve as the big problem in my life. 90+% of my other personal problems are connected directly and without any reliance on circuitous routes to the problem about my missing accolade. For instance, if people said, "This homeless bum actually had a good idea about physics," then when the Reddit pop-sci twitterati ask me about it for their articles, I could plug my novel which is also very good and would surely generate a nice, if modest, source of residual income for me so that the homeless monkey isn't chasing me. I tell you! I feel that monkey there all the time and it is NOT a good feeling. If I was a well-known scientist with a successful book, do you think women would turn me down as much? If I was a famous scientist, then I could probably get some buyers for the paintings I made. The accolade is the problem; for some reason, there's no demand for the abstract art made by the guy lives behind the dumpster.

In my head I say, "This woman should say yes to me because I am one of the world's best scientists," but then she says no because she doesn't know that about me. When I ask why she doesn't know that about it, it goes back to the abnormal post-2009 scientific proceedings and people preferring to pretend like they didn't read my paper. She doesn't know because the people who would pass that information along her way are keeping it secret. You say, "They didn't read it," but I say, "Maybe, but lots of them did and are pretending not to have."

I want my fucking accolade. I earned it. I did the work. That accolade belongs to me. I want that accolade. If they were going to give it to a public person to steal, they would have done it by now. However, even while the public people won't steal it, they deem for some reason that it is preferable to pretend that it doesn't exist than to give me the accolade for it. This infuriates me, and I see the hand of the federal government in it.

>>10941693
Tooker I feel you. But trust me, you are not the only person who has been fucked by society, and you won't be the last. Life fucking sucks. We will never get what we deserve. But you know what you can get? If you come to a third-world/sex-tourism country, just by virtue of being american and knowing english you'll get a respectable job with modest income. Then with that income you can get all the pussy you want. And as young as you want!

>>10941686
I don't concede that infinity is included in the set of all binary products of tau with an integer

>>10941690
>That abstract doesn't read to me like he's using your idea.
He is using his own idea, and I have not alleged plagiarism against him. My complaint is that he would never have written his paper if mine didn't set off the light bulb in his head, and I would have liked an acknowledgement for writing a helpful paper. Changing mass with constant time is exactly the mirror image of the constant mass with changing time that I suggested. You see how he writes, "I have no idea why mass might change?" I think he wrote that because he read my paper, noticed that the funny behavior can be attached to the scalar "m" just as easily as the scalar "t," and that moving it around doesn't the equations at all due to multiplicative associativity, and then he wrote a nice paper about it and demonstrated his subject matter expertise far beyond my own.

Tooker is a schizo but he can ateast grow muscles. Hoe do you do it? Are your satellite cells strong and healthy?

>>10941698
>just by virtue of being american and knowing english you'll get a respectable job with modest income.
How does this work? This is very appealing to me, and I would like to evacuate the USA on account of gangstalkers alone.

>>10941720
It has to be if real numbers are continuous and the limit of sin(x) as x goes to infinity is 0. I just proved that based on your proof, so unless you can find a flaw with my proof or my two other assumptions your proof is wrong.

>>10941720
>if mine didn't set off the light bulb in his head
You can't really fault the universe for that. Look up Rupert Sheldrake and morphic fields. It seems like it's not physically possible to have a new idea without it changing the actual topology of time. It's mysterious why the human overmind reacts the way it had, but there's not a lot we can do about others having similar thoughts in response to similar ideas.

EGREGIOUS UNETHICAL ACTIVITY IN ACADEMIA

chapter 3 of my non-fiction book
The General Relevance of the Modified Cosmological Model
http://www.vixra.org/abs/1712.0598

>>10941725
I'm schizotypal, >140iq and I can build muscle... I just can't get show muscles, my density and strength increases though.

>>10941693
Top kek. Imagine what the book must read like.

>>10941740
Do you have any knowledge on which I should reject my suspicion that he read my paper and then wrote his paper about the ideas I inspired him to have? If not, I will retain this suspicion until further notice.

>>10941738
>It has to be if real numbers are continuous and the limit of sin(x) as x goes to infinity is 0.
please prove this formally. My argument will be that to get infinity in there, you to have to take the limit, and when you do that you introduce hiccup about the regular increments of length tau. To formalize what I mean, I would have to see your formal statement though.

>>10941732
Dude, you are american! You know english and are intelligent. You could easily make it in most jobs in any third world country. All you need is to get there and start applying.

I suggest you start researching now which country you'd like to be in and then see their immigrations requirements. With Mexico you can unironically just cross the border, though you can also apply for a work visa or whatever. It's the easy life from there.

You know what I do when I'm stressed? I go to an ATM (there is one in my office building), print 100 bucks, book an hour with an escort through the internet. Then room is 15, thot is 80, 5 for whatever extras come (one time this thot charged me 5 for the condoms, I just give it to them because come on, their lives suck and I have money so whatever)

>>10941778
I already proved it. You have to find a flaw in that proof if you want to say I'm wrong.

>My argument will be that to get infinity in there, you to have to take the limit, and when you do that you introduce hiccup about the regular increments of length tau.
So are you saying that for a continuous function f the limit of f at a point x is not equal to f(x), that the sine function or real numbers aren't continuous, or that infinity has some previously unknown special property?

>>10941764
I honestly think you will like it.

>>10941732
>the USA on account of gangstalkers alone.
Indeed, I had already resolved to leave the USA before I became homeless. I became homeless after I was denied at foreign passport control in a country that doesn't even require a visa for USA citizens. This is another instance, this getting stopped at passport control, in addition to my academic problems, where I felt the soft hands of the USA government slide down my chest to rip open my belly button and then stomach fuck me with their rhinoceros thunder cock ban hammer. I had plenty of money when I quit my job in 2017. After being stopped at the airport three times and losing all my travel budget and airfare, I could no longer afford housing.

>>10941799
>I already proved it.
Your sentence is not a proof, dude. It's a claim.

>So are you saying that
NO!!!!. I'm saying that for me to take apart your position with rigor, I need you to present your position to me as a rigorous statement with, like, logic symbols and stuff. The fact you have tried to paraphrase me wrongly, apparently with the intention to raise a straw man, bodes poorly for my opinion of your criticism. Do you know how to write math? If you have a TeX editor you can screenshot it and post it as an image.

>>10941800
But you were trying to go to Israel that time. I am suggesting you go to a shithole like my country. Don't worry, there are nice upper class and middle class neighbourhoods for you to settle but the benefit is that almost everyone else is poor so even the pretty girls are cheap. Most expensive pussy I've gotten was 200, and she was supermodel tier. But even for 50 bucks you can get a nice ride, 23, white. 18 still will cost you less than 100. If you want younger than 18 it's trickier and more expensive but not even I have gone there yet so I'm sure you won't need that either. At least when you start.

>>10941811
See
>>10941683
>>10941686

Like I said, I already proved it. Now, since we both agree that infinity =/= a(tau) there's either a problem with my proof or my assumptions. Can you find a problem with the proof? All but one of my assumptions are proven routinely in calculus classes, namely that your proof is correct, so if there's no problem with my proof then your proof must be wrong.

>>10941778
>any knowledge
It's not relevant. You have to prove that there was a causal connection for there to be one. If not, we have to invoke some acausal hypothesis. We can't arbitrarily pick between causal and acausal hypotheses on a whim with no experiment to back it up.

OP where did you get that image? I have a sticker with that pattern on it that i used in my car, and it improved my mileage by 10%

Today is a weird day, and this thread is weird. I think you have heard my chanting about abominations and wrath 24/7, you have told people not to fuck with me today to see if I'm always doing that on my own or if I'm always enraged by these gangstalkers around me. It is the latter. I am always enraged by these gangstalkers around me, in person and in the threads, and it IS VERY NOTICEABLE that they are not doing today. Usually they do it all day every day, and that is why I'm talking about centipede dungeons all the time every day.

The fact that you can tell them turn it off, and they do, and you do not tell them that every day, bodes extremely poorly for your share in the tree of life.

However! Listen to me you two from the gym today: If that was you two, then I hold nothing against you and your company felt good. Now listen to me you man from the first Monday of school, and the Wednesday, but probably not that Friday. You have been on my mind, and I probably don't have anything against you either. While you were teaching, "I was saying in my head, 'I'm going to fucking kill you!!!! Why are you wearing a disguise in front of me?!?!?!?" You said, "Wait until you see it," which is what I will do, and you are very smart to know it. That afternoon on Drudge it said "Trump rejects oldest friend," and it occurred to me that you might be my friend. Man, caralho.

>>10941812
You are really into the hookers, huh? Maybe if one day you say which country is the one you call your own then I'll know which country is the one you're talking about.

>>10941842
I made that image in MS paint with some stuff I got from Google Image. If you buy my book AND READ IT, then it will probably improve your whole life by like 15-20%, easy.

tooker you ever think that if you weren't a fucking creep to women, you would still be a respected academic? like if you could go back and just stay in your room all through grad school and avoid the people you assaulted, would you?

>>10941856
I'm not particularly into hookers. I am really into women, but I'm not Chad Thundercock so I manage with what I have. Also, my country is not particularly important. I told you, mine is one of the most expensive. In Cuba I got a 19 year old blonde white girl fot 30 fucking bucks. You can go to ANY third world country and get dirty deeds done dirt cheap.

>>10940459
The pic actually matches up with his physics stackexchange profile pic.
> mfw

https://physics.stackexchange.com/users/197484/jonathan-tooker

>>10941862
I wouldn't change anything without foreknowledge of what the changes would be. I'm not a creep to women. The opposite in fact. I'm pretty much, like, maximum straight shooter dude.

>>10941873
>You can go to ANY third world country and get dirty deeds done dirt cheap.
I totally don't know what you mean there dude!!!!!

>>10941887
weren't you charged with rape?

>>10941875
He looks more pleasant in the mugshot actually. I was hoping to about to be laughing my ass off if he had actually used his mugshot for his physics stackexchange pic, that'd be pretty great.

>>10941887
>The opposite in fact. I'm pretty much, like, maximum straight shooter dude.
So do you tell them right away that you're schizophrenic or do you wait for a lull in the conversation?

>>10941894
Okay. Search for a map. Now locate the USA. Do you see the every country below it? Central America? South America? Okay here it is: people are so poor here that even the pretty girls are prostitutes. No joke, my last lay was also a graphic designer. These are shithole countries, women have no opportunities.

>>10941895
It was a double murder/rape actually, but the charges got thrown out after the whole jury and both lawyers got found under a bridge.

>>10941887
Supreme gentleman

>>10941898
I did use it. I have a couple of accounts and linked accounts because of my many bans and ban evasions. That pic is on another one. I like that pic.

>>10941903
Schizophrenia is something I googled when I was thinking about asking why you all call me that. I do have paranoid ideation which is a symptom, but it says the main symptoms are delusional thinking and disordered thinking, and you don't have that then you're not schizophrenic. I don't have either of those symptoms and you retarded if you think every wrong belief is a delusional belief. The difference is that the latter are easily disproven. I don't have any easily disproven beliefs, and obviously I don't have disordered thinking. I think the reason I have paranoia is because my shit is all fucked up, and fucked up shit is going on around me all the time, such as for some reason being a non-criminal, no warrants, non contraband, stopped at passport control in some foreign country and refused entry with no reason given when they didn't even ask for a VISA from anyone else on the plane.

>>10941941
>fucked up shit is going on around me all the time
In that airport, I got sent onto the shit list unbeknownst to myself, and for reasons I cannot fathom (except close associations with well-known and notorious terrorists LOLE.) I was able to see the effect of me being thrown onto the airport's shit list, but I wonder what other shit lists I am thrown on, unbeknownst to myself, and for reasons I can fathom perfectly fine with my paranoid ideation, which do not have obvious consequences like getting sent to the airport's dungeon. For instance, I am prone to speculations regarding some list or list-like thing in the universe which is in some way related to my inability to publish in any normal venue such as arXiv. I am someone's shit list at arXiv. Is it the government's?

>>10941941
The bad guys probably sprayed something you ate or drank 9 years ago with an aerosol that contained a virus that causes mood symptoms and agitation so you could be dismissed easily without being given an honest critique. You're lucky it didn't make you fully insane, probably that high pre morbid IQ compensating for it. Good luck with that bud.

>>10941941
>but it says the main symptoms are delusional thinking and disordered thinking
>I don't have either of those symptoms
Hmm, let's see... you believe you're god, that you're somehow connected to various famous people (related? reincarnated?), that scientists' have stolen your ideas and are in a conspiracy against you, that you're a great genius who solved the RH and disproved evolution. These are not only massive delusions, they are classic ones very commonly seen in schizophrenics. As to disordered thinking, this is apparent in your numerology-esque arguments and connect-the-dots scattershot gibberish such as >>10941308

>>10941955
>9 years
that's mighty specifically over there by howell mill and 10th street, ay? Don't forget the one about 2.5 years ago after I quit Exide and woke up with a VERY sore chode on the plane: #3 in pic

>mood symptoms and agitation
please describe

>dismissed easily
please elaborate

>>10941957
My name is God, pic is my maternal grandmother Anne, academic idea thievery is the sixth biggest meme in academia, I am a great genius, I have attempted to solve RH and evolution. If you think that any of that is a delusion, then I challenge you to identify the easy disproof which makes a generalized wrong belief into a uniquely delusional belief.

>>10941969
Dude if you go to war with the normal fags you are going to get your shit pushed in, that's the way it works. The most overwhelmingly powerful people in the world estimate that the cost of suppressing the truth about the cosmos is less than the profit they make by doing so. They killed two US presidents just for saying the words secret societies and federal reserve in the same evening. They use the united states military to launder money, and they operate an intellectual property rights cartel. They set the standards for "core curriculum" and own all major media corporations. If you thought for one second that you had a chance of letting the cat out of the bag, you actually are the delusional schizo these faggots have made you out to be. Schizophrenia can and will be INFLICTED on any one who poses a legitimate threat, and cancers too. You don't need to worry about the alphabet boys coming to get you, you were got the moment you stepped out of line.

>>10941983
>My name is God
It's not. And why do you constantly spam quotes from the Bible and tell everyone that you are going to smite them? Do you believe you're god or not?

>pic is my maternal grandmother Anne
Pic related is a great example of one of your delusions, wherein you think that putting 2 pictures together means something. Come on Jon, what point are you making here? That you are related to the Romanovs? Please keep proving my point.

>academic idea thievery is the sixth biggest meme in academia
No one has stolen your ideas, none of them are coherent enough to steal and no one is even aware of them.

>I am a great genius
You're not, you're delusional.

>I have attempted to solve RH and evolution.
This is the only accurate statement in your post.

>then I challenge you to identify the easy disproof which makes a generalized wrong belief into a uniquely delusional belief.
There is nothing to disprove because juxtaposed pictures and changing mathematical definitions are not arguments in the first place.

>>10941992
If you believe your delusions aren't delusions, why are you being vague and pretending that you don't have them? Everyone here knows that you believe you're god / the messiah / you'll have power over everyone in the future, etc. Why deny it?

>>10942014
Maybe he has already been given the room number one-o-one treatment.

>>10942002
>It's not.
it is

>>10942027
How?

>inb4 some numerology bullshit

>>10939795
I lost the battle Tooker. Talking to you about escorts got me horny. I'm going for another one tomorrow.

>>10942029
>How?
By the gimmel and the dalet that are the first two letters of my name.

BUY MY BOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

>>10942061
Even if that was a valid way of determining your name, that would make your shortened hebrew name "Ged" not God. You also didn't respond to anything else I said, because even you realize how irrational your delusions are.

Literally nothing will ruin a mans career and credibility faster or more reliably than brainwashing him into literally believing that he is God. I'm just saying

>>10942073
What about schizophrenia?

>>10942073
Well, no one brainwashed Tooker. He was pretty much born this way. Actually, with how shitty his life has been gone, you'd believe that he would be convinced that he is the opposite of God. The least powerful, least influential, least respected being, less than dirt. But even through all the hardships he faces, the schizophrenia always wins against adversity. Despite having such a horrible life (literally homeless) he still thinks he is God.

>>10942070
There's no vowels. Where are you getting that Latin "e" from?

>>10942083
So you're saying he was CLAMPED?

>>10942095
Surely a genius like you would know that in Hebrew script the vowels are read but not written. Actually, shortening your name to the gimmel and dalet would make your name "Geda" not "Ged" but I was humoring you.

>>10942082
Well obviously that's the primer and the god delusion is the fresh coat of paint.

>>10942103
No, people are just born like that. I've never heard of clamping causing schizophrenia. If that was the case, we'd all be schizos. Specially me given that I'm not only clamped, but circumclampinated.

>>10942095
But Jon, where did you get the latin letter "o" if there are no vowels? For that to be the case you need a nikkud or patah, but since there are no vowels you simply have gimmel dalet with no sound.

>>10942104
There is no "e" and "a" in Hebrew idiot, and the letter that makes the "a" sound is the last letter:
Gimmel
Dalet
Lamed
Aleph

You are stupid as fuck. You see those four letters? Three of them aren't vowels but one of them is.

>>10942110
>TFW circumclaminated
feelsbadman.jpg

>>10942115
>where did you get the latin letter "o" if there are no vowels?
I got it from the sound my name makes when you say it. You're not being a fucking retard on purpose are you?

>>10942118
Well, we are all circumclampinated anyways. And I wasn't even born Jewish.

>>10942118
>>10942128
*claps in burger*

>>10942117
>There is no "e" and "a" in Hebrew idiot
Of course there is, the vowels in Hebrew are called nikkud. The gimmel in your name has the nikkud shva, which makes an "eh" sound and the the dalet has a patah which makes an "ah" sound. So it is read G-eh-d-ah. Many times when Hebrew names are translated to English they were Romanized and don't read correctly but Gedaliah is pretty accurate. It's read more like Gedaleeyah in Hebrew.

>You see those four letters? Three of them aren't vowels but one of them is.
No, none of those are vowels Jon. Time to go back to Hebrew school.

>>10942125
>I got it from the sound my name makes when you say it.
When I read your hebrew name it sounds like Gedaleeyah.. There's nothing that sounds like "God" in there, Jon. This is another delusion.

>>10942134
I'm not even burger. In my country only 10% of men are circumcised. But I was born to a white christian middle class family so of course they had to cut our dick.

Well, I grew up to become Jewish anyways so who cares.

>>10942138
>>10942140
You're going to give him a psychotic break, watch out.

>>10942144
>I grew up to become jewish
You mean you converted to Judaism? If anything that's a step up from Christianity but unless your mother is jewish you ain't getting no Israeli passport.

>>10942147
No, my mother isn't Jewish which is a damn shame. I'd love to live in Israel but that's okay, I can serve the great nation from here. Or at least I'll try.

>>10942138
>Of course there is
there's not.

>>10942159
They're right there on the right in the vowels table.

>>10942164
those are all Hebrew letters

>>10942144
Since you are a goy the real Jews will never share the secret encrypted meaning of the kabbalah with you.

>>10942140
>When I read your hebrew name it sounds like Gedaleeyah
>when they told what your name is, they told you wrong
>i know how to say your name, not you

>>10942169
I don't really mind. The Jews have led humanity to prosperity for millennia for basically nothing in return. If they want to keep some secrets that's fine with me. I'll just enjoy myself redpilling people on how the United Nations are antisemitic and how we need a final solution to the German question.

>>10942168
Hebrew vowels aren't letters. In order to get gimmel dalet to sound like "God" you need either the first vowel (patah) or the second vowel (kamatz) in that table on the gimmel. But you don't have that. You have a shva on the gimmel in your name, which makes it sound like Geh. So if you say there are no vowels you don't have God and if you say you do have vowels you don't have God. Your name isn't God.

>>10942173
Who told you your name was God? No one, they told you your name was גְּדַלְיָּה which is pronounced "Gedaleeyah" in Hebrew.

>>10942177
>>10942180
I
AM
GOD

>>10942177
To be honest at this point Tooker would be more likely to believe that a government conspiracy changed the entire Hebrew language just to spite him, than to believe he is wrong about being God.

We are talking about the guy who saw the truman show and thought that the government had actually put him inside a fake town and turned him into Truman.

>>10942189
I just disproved the delusion that your name is God. Isn't that what you asked me to do? Instead of responding you merely repeat the delusion. Thanks for confirming your mental illness.

>>10942176
Amazing. The militarized, tribal mentality and accustomed to subservience. I only support Isreal because big boy Donny done told me to/ I tell you h'what.

>>10942189
You mean I AM GEDA

>>10942211
To be quite honest I supported Israel way before Trump was politically relevant. I don't even care admitting who "converted" me, even if he is mocked on /sci/ every time he is mentioned. PragerU's videos on the bible and Israel absolutely redpilled me. Just the fact that Judaism was able to produce someone as perfect as Dennis Prager is enough proof to me that the nation is like a mighty lion. When it is sleeping, no one dares wake it. Whoever blesses Israel will be blessed, and whoever curses Israel will be cursed.

>>10939926
It does for us. Whenever you're sleeping, you're not shitposting here.

>>10942180
This hand written Hebrew comes from the Rabbi at my childhood Hebrew school who was able to vouch for my authentic Judaism when I was trying to emigrate.

>>10942222
It only has one syllable when I shorten it, and the sound of that syllable isn't Gehd. It's not Gawd either, but God sounds more like Gedalia than Ged does, and Godalia looks like it says Go! Dalia!

>he thinks he knows how to pronounce his own name
>obviously psychotic

I want to study a physics model based on octonions and sedenions.

I believe the ninth dimension has to do with quantum entanglement and cold based on an equation I wrote for tree databases that showed heat compresses.

>>10941875
Look at the questions asked by Tooker:
1. "I don't know how to prove that something is Lorentz invariant, help me".
2. "Is the linear combination of eigenvectors with different eigenvalue still an eigenvector? I'm too dumb to do simple math".
3. "I'm going to ask what a functional derivative is just to answer it myself and look smart".

>>10941983
>>10941992
You forgot one

>>10939795
Tooker, what is your opinion on the age of consent?

>>10942297
>This hand written Hebrew comes from the Rabbi at my childhood Hebrew school who was able to vouch for my authentic Judaism when I was trying to emigrate.
There is nothing wrong with how it's written. Again, do you understand that in Hebrew script vowels are read but not written? Ask your rabbi, or any rabbi you want, how to pronounce it and they will tell you "Gehdalyuh." The name comes straight from the Hebrew Bible.

>It only has one syllable when I shorten it
No, geda is two syllables.

>>10942299
https://forvo.com/word/gedaliah/

GEDALYAH

>>10942297
>It's not Gawd either, but God sounds more like Gedalia than Ged does, and Godalia looks like it says Go! Dalia!
This is like saying Jan sounds more like Jonathan than Jon does. From now on your name is Jan, ok Jan?

>>10942001
>(((They)))

>>10942233
(((we))) did though.

>>10942194
we did change it on him though.

>>10944095
Please don't feed his delusions. Tooker is an asshole but he is actually suffering. He has expressed many times, including this thread, that being poor and homelesa kills him inside. And what his schizophrenia makes out to be "anal rape implants" are probably severe infections in his anus and urethra caused by the lack of care he takes of himself due to poverty.

The best we can do is let Tooker wither out and die peacefully. Don't push him further unless you want to see him in the news again. Tooker is very much willing to kill.

>>10941080
>He's kinda like Terry Davis
I pray(not literally) this board will spam assgapes to commemorate tooker one day.

>>10939795
Some fag published an entire book on "higher dimensional versions of pythagoras's theorem" including construtive proofs of a^n + b^n = c^n for integer n >= 3.
As far as cranks go you aren't so bad op

>>10944433
No need to spam assgapes when we have his nudes. And he has a nice dick too so I'm he'd appreciate that on Tooker day we all post little Took.

All of you that think my name, an American's name, is pronounced with an Israeli accent are wrong.
>schlong
ibb.co [slash] 4ZMnR1G

>>10941873
You’re starting to make me think the whole epstein dying thing was fake

All of you who think I invented the time circuit are absolutely right, however.

>>10944491
>the time circuit

>>10944483
You posted a chart >>10942159 showing how to pronounce it, it's not an accent. All these feckless excuses are just further proof of your delusional state.

>>10944506
Nah. That chart showed that "a" and "e" are Latin letters, not Hebrew letters. While you're revising history, maybe you could tell us about the hollow cost?

>>10939795
what . are . you . talking . about

>>10944508
>hidden variable bullshit
oh

>>10939926
>3641st night of sleep
Are you not even 10 years old?

>>10944490
No, he's dead for sure. Underage is a whole different game. The girls I fuck are just poor women with no income. To fuck kids you need a whole criminal operation, and Epstein was just a pawn. He had to get killed.

That said, there are huge pedo rings all over here too. But no one cares because the girls are not white.

>>10944526
We're coming up on 10 years since Manafort paid (passed along?) that $1M bribe to have me blacklisted from arXiv (or something) and then made millions of more dollars selling my stolen semen ('member the evidence from the freezer in Manafort's storage unit) to the women dying to have my baby
>>10941983
while all the women they put near me tell me to fuck off because I'm a broke loser with nothing good going for me that they can see. Do they put the women who want my semen near me? No, they keep them far away.

>>10944532
>No, he's dead for sure.
I wonder. Certainly, if there was ever a prisoner to fit the bill of someone who would kill themself to avoid spending the rest of their life in prison, it was Epstein. However, the whole thing was very suspicious.

>>10944545
WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK TOOKER

Do you really think your sperm is that good? Why?

>>10944554
No, he was murdered for sure. But he's dead. Very dead.

>>10944556
>Do you really think your sperm is that good? Why?
Yes, I do. I am the true vine of life. I am the hereditary emperor of several empires, the king of several kingdoms, and the women whose fathers know it want my cum. Among the Scottish Freemasons, I have rank 47 which is, incidentally, the rank that only God has. Among the Egyptian masons, I have rank 100. Fathers in the world want this passed on to their seed, but if they have attempted to bypass the direct deposit step at which I blow my load inside their daughters, then they will go no part of it, and their family will totally die with no survivors. For the time being, unfortunately, the king of kings is a king without a crown. Certainly the other kings are trying to keep it that way.

This is part of criterion for being an extra on the mockery of my life: you can't be anyone who wants my cum. They could stock this place with those people and make this a paradise for me, but instead they stock it with the extras that make it a paradise for my enemies' cuckold fetishes, and then none of these women think the absolute best outcome in life is for me to blow my load inside of them.

Case in point: remember Zika and the microcephaly? Did you think it was weird that Zika had been around for several decades with no birth defects, but then in 2014-2015 there were thousands of them, and then the birth defects stopped again? The truth about those deformed babies is that those fathers down there, rather than just asking me to fuck their daughters which I would have done happily for the most part, instead asked the other guy (my nemesis) if they could buy some of my stolen semen, and then that guy GMed the semen he sold them and there were all those deformed babies.

Pernambuco/Recife is no random place in the world. I think my favorite person was (is?) from there. Why he's buying my semen from those who would poison his daughters while they cuck me instead of asking me to do the direct deposit totally escapes my understanding.
You all say, "Obviously the women all say no to him, look at his rhetoric. Duh, what a fucking idiot." However, if I approached the women paying top dollar for my semen, then I could use that exact same rhetoric to say, "Ay, guh u wan sum fuk for free instead?," and they would all say yes to me and bend over with their pants down. It is nothing but the malice of my enemies to keep me separated from those who would pay top $$$ for my cum, and would love the chance to say yes if I offered them some for free.

>>10944508
>That chart showed that "a" and "e" are Latin letters, not Hebrew letters.
What about "o"?

Mundane events related to time travel.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1240030/pg1

John Titor, the Montauk Project, the e-Cat and Geometric Unity
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread966329/pg1

I am the anonymous physicist featured in the black hole article yesterday. AMA
https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/ukbz6/i_am_the_anonymous_physicist_featured_in_the/

Who edited the talking points? (Benghazi?)
https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=u7Q6o_1559880838
I recorded this video right before the 9/11 Bengahzi attack. This is the "anti-Muslim" video. When they were having that scandal about "who edited the talking points," that was really about who was inserting the typos into my posts. In this video I record in real time typos being inserted into my posts. You can see that I post totally cogent text, and then a few seconds later, the test changes to be so riddled with typos that it becomes basically incomprehensible.

>>10944615
>Certainly the other kings are trying to keep it that way.

>>10944646
>other kings

>>10944648

>>10944615
>>10944622
You have left me in tears, Tooker. I now know that you are right. Infinity hat does exist, it's your self-esteem.

Yeah, well... what exists is the thought process in which I get angry about I have to beg women for pussy as an indigent person while my enemy is getting rich selling my semen to who not only don't want me to beg for their pussy, but are willing for my cum to end up inside them.

>>10944712
Yeah, well... what exists is the thought process in which I get angry about how I have to beg women for pussy as an indigent person while my enemy is getting rich selling my semen to women who not only don't want me to beg for their pussy, but are willing to let my cum to end up inside them for free.

>>10944716
How much semen did that guy get though? Or do you give him refills?

>>10944532
You seem to know a lot for being ‘not’ him

>>10944749
Man I WISH I was Epstein.

>>10944719
I have never given anyone any semen in my life, ever, under conditions, not even one drop of my semen has ever been given to anyone. It is possible to create semen from skin cells, and certain;y my semen has gotten on many women. If they made some abomination with afterwards, then I will be sad to learn that. How many abominations were consecrated you ask? Very many, is my guess.

Here's a question: If the entire extended family of everyone who wrought that abomination suddenly died, then how many women would be left to have my babies the normal way? In this case, I think the answer is still "very many."

How about another question: If I had phone, and I threw my phone at a woman, and it hit in her in the lip, then does that mean my phone becomes her phone because it hit her in the lip? I don't think so.

>>10944712
>Expanded image
>smells like tooker
>scrolled faster

>>10944756
Pedophiles are subhuman

Listen you: If my enemy poisoned your children, then don't kill yourself. Although you have allied yourself with my enemy, if my enemy wants you to die, then I probably don't want you to die.

>>10944773
I know. But Epstein certainly had a better life than all of us.

However, I would be wrong to totally state my thoughts in this matter. If you have seen that my enemy hated you, and you have seen that I loved you, and you still went to my enemy and avoided me, then that is not good, and that is not behavior I will want to promote. I am concerned.

Honestly, how do schizos come up with all this crank nonsense? It's not random either, but a special combination of buzzwords and structure with a whole load of non-sense woven in. I am just wondering how...

>>10944793
We don’t know that yet :D

>>10944788
Hey guys
Guys what
1/inf=0 therefore Riemann is disproved

>>10944856
Yeah, how come none of you all noticed it during the 150 years when I wasn't working on it?

>>10944892
Becauase if you shift the letters RH by 2 letters, you get TJ. Also known as Tooker, Jonathon.

>>10944656
>>10944648

if you get one of those hats, no one will suspect you're balding

Of the many things I am, balding is not one of them.

>>10944622
hey

so this

is the part

where you have to be real fucking careful about who you show this shit to. ok? it sounds dumb, but only people who really, truly, deeply love goerge lucas for the lovable idiot genius he is are gonna use this power for good. Wrong """JEDI""" gets his hands on this shit and bada bing badaboom back to grey. so. be. really. fucking. careful. also, get some humor your gonna need it loloolol

>>10945752
oh and generally as a rule, what goes around comes around so send me some good vibes ill cook it in an oven that even i cant see and let you know when pizza time is ok

>>10945754
ok g-d dammit sorry last thing i swear but after thinking about history n junk this bears repeating to a you even if you already know which, if your science ends up checking out, might very well be the case dude. the be careful about who you show this to part INCLUDES the current you in your space time location. Sturdy ideas make for the most comfortable waiting rooms which is something someone somewhere somehow might think. maby. aight thats it ima go ask stanly and david some more great questions

>>10945373
I think you should still get a hat so that you can represent infinity hat.

Tooker, you'd be so much happier if you just went to Thailand and SEAmaxxed instead of spending your time shitposting(?) about your delusions about being god and how women reject you because of mother Helen or whatever.

>>10946032
Thailand is gay. Why not just go to south america?

>>10946188
High crime rates, low iq, etc. Besides in Thailand you don't have to buy hookers, you can just make a tinder page and get hundreds of likes within the first few days (if you are white and moderatly attractive), meanwhile you'll have to be rich or a chad to get hot latino chicks.

Tooker, hunny, calm the fuck down.

>>10940300
Holy fuck is that really him, lmao

>>10940449
Shut the fuck up you bitch

>>10940624
Hahahahahahhahahahah

>>10941413
Uh, no, it's not like that.

>>10946188
Is it really that easy there tho? I mean i guess you can lie about taking them with you to the states if they are willing to fuck, but then you'll have a harder time fucking many chicks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUG42l9EjiE
Vid kinda relevant,

>>10945752
>goerge
Whenever I see this name recently, it makes me think about the Man of Lawlessness prophesied to herald the coming of the Day of the Lord in 2 Thessalonians 2.

It says here, "You're a heretic."

>>10946734
Who is that?

>>10946734
>>10946539
Hi tooker, there you are, have you considered my suggestion about Thailand? You'll be injecting women with your GODly sperm left and right :)))

>>10946737
I think the eyes are, like, my dad, or one of his lookalikes, or something. Supposedly he's some notorious pedo named "Something 2k," but I think the main point of pic related is that the eyes are well-known person, Someone Tooker probably.

I noticed my dad started using a photoshopped image on G+. When I looked at his profile pic, I said, "Who the fuck is this?" I think that pic on G+ is my Dad's face blended with the face of the man whose eyes appear in pic related.

>>10946766
If I haven't gotten you to understand by now that I have no intention to inject any women with my semen until after I have the opportunity to mock my enemies as I force them to watch my servants kill their children, then there is probably nothing I could ever write to get you to finally understand what my true intentions are.

>>10946779
Ok Tooker this is retarded. Are you seriously going to let that deter you from having a good sex life? A good sex life should be the starting point, not the end point. All successful mean I know started by having tight pussies to serve their dicks. Once you figure that out, everything else just kinda follows trivially. Go get your dick wet, man.

>>10941762
>I just can't get show muscles
It means you probably are a "moderate responder". Why can't I build muscle?

>>10946832
The sex life I want is for women to say yes to me when I ask them out because it is a well-known fact that I am awesome. In fact, my fantasy is not even that they will say yes to me, which would be a nice improvement, but that they offer themselves to me because they see sex with me as a highly positive, desirable outcome. Presently, due to the efforts of the agents of the USA I presume, women do not generally view my dick going to into them as a highly desirable, positive outcome. There are guys in the world whose dicks going into them would be viewed as a positive outcome, and I want to migrate into that group. There is some lie that there is no group of men whose dicks are such that women view those dicks entering them as a positive outcome, but I am not one of the people convinced by that lie.

Moving to some 3rd world country where women say yes to me because I'm pushing around a wheelbarrow half-full of baht doesn't quite float up to the level of my sexual fantasies. If I move to another country, it's going to be about getting away from gangstalkers and making room for Vladimir to launch the nuclear strike without blowing me up, not about fucking their poor women in that country.

>>10946886
man.. that was my dream last night Jon, I was in some hotel on some school trip, I guess I was back in highschool or something, because I'm in my 30s but anyway, had plans to bang this one chick the next day, then this other girl, came up to me at a table I was sitting at and was like "Hey if your friend wasn't here would you fuck me?" and I was all like "I'd fuck you regardless of who's here" and she was like "Good here's my room key, I'll see you later" Then I was walking around a mall trying to find the entrance to the hotel, I think there was a movie I was trying to see at the time though, so I went to get some fast food, before the movie, did that and I needed a cigarette, I found some outdoor patio, but there was no smoking signs on all the benches and tables so I lit a smoke while standing and other patrons started yelling at me that it was no smoking, I explained I thought that was just for the seating, apologized and made my way outside, having my smoke I started thinking 'this day is going pretty well so far, two gorgeous women want me to inject them with my sperm' and then I woke up.

Why the hell is this thread still up? This isn't science or math, it's just garbage!

thread about publishing on aXiv
>not about science or math
OK

>>10947054
No, this is beautiful. I rarely come to /sci/ but I always hope for tooker now..
It's like watching a Trainwreck you just can't look away from how destructive it is.

>>10947181
>Can't look away from how destructive it is.
Amen. Come Lord Jesus.

Have any of you ever wondered what an Amazon Kindle Direct Publishing Sales Dashboard™ looks like when it is neither based nor red-pilled?

>>10947328
Maybe it's just too based Tooker.

>>10947054
Tooker threads are a combination of pure mathematics, physics, clinical psychology, economics, sexology, ...

>>10947443
Maybe it's just that you all fill your bookshelves with the books other people write and conspire together not to buy mine?

>>10947610
It's not a conspiracy. Why would we buy your book? And I mean this for real. Why would someone buy your book when
1) You are particularly unknown
2) The illustrations in the amazon page are vague/don't clearly show what the book may be about to hook fans of a particularl genre or style
3) No marketing except your rants

>>10947721
>1) You are particularly unknown
Yes, this is the main thrust of that conspiracy which I allege. Why is it, do you think, that I am "unknown?"

Also, please give an example of a book (or books) that you think have a good Amazon blurb. I am doing the Amazon marketing in which they say to expect about one sale per ten clicks, but I have 16 clicks and no sales, and I am re-evaluating my blurb.

Dark energy is just gravity leaking into our universe from other universes.

>>10940359
Why should the big bang conserve momentum? Quantum mechanics doesn't. Small momentum violation on the order of planks constant would have been greatly expanded by now

>>10947807
yup
https://www.theonion.com/astronomers-just-going-to-go-ahead-and-say-dark-matter-1819578005

>>10947819
>Quantum mechanics doesn't.
Please explain what you mean by this. IMO and up to the limit of my ignorance, QM does conserve momentum.

>>10947800
>but I have 16 clicks and no sale
I have your book right here on my shelf. What are you saying?

>>10947832
I'm saying that no one bought my book since the advertising campaign began in August.

>>10947842
Maybe the cover art isn't working? That's how most laypeople judge books.

>>10947850
Dude, I think my cover art is completely dank. You don't like it?

My cover art was cool enough to get 10,000,000,000+ tribute memes anyway.

>>10947862
>You don't like it?
It didn't stop me from buying your book. I just know for a fact cover art is often the only thing most people care about when shopping online.
It goes: COVER ART --> *click* --> PRODUCT DESCRIPTION

>>10947800
>Yes, this is the main thrust of that conspiracy which I allege. Why is it, do you think, that I am "unknown?"
You got me there Tooker. I forgot about THAT conspiracy.

Anyways, I don't know about good examples but I know the brainlets look at the cover and title to get a feel. I personally see your cover and title and don't really feel anything. I personally think that your cover is very amateur looking. That's actually the first thing I feel, like your book was made by a random amateur writer with no idea of what he was doing. And it looks shitty. You should work on that. Try working more on the composition of the art in general.

Just fyi >>10947881 isn't me. My only posts in this thread are: >>10947850 >>10947862 >>10947873

sorry I meant >>10947850 >>10947873 are me

>>10947889
Maybe you should go to reddit so that he can just see your username, you raging faggot.

>I personally see your cover and title and don't really feel anything.

>>10947901
That's a nice quote Tooker but the picture itself is just basic. Try to imagine that same picture with another quote. Do you feel that? Literally any retarded 16 year old girl quote could be on that background. I hope this proves my point that your cover does not evoke anything particularly interesting. You should look harder my man.

>>10947900
>you raging faggot
I noticed you'd given similar advice so I didn't want to impersonate you, dillweed

>>10947912
Man who fucking cares. Why do you use 4chan even?

You should also know that Tooker is God so he can just sense a different essence from your posts. I know this because Tooker always smells me. I've talked with him on hundreds of threads and somehow he always just smells me and starts telling me that he'll fucking kill me because he knows it is me, and unfortunately I did him wrong in the past.

>>10947916
bro are you mad?

idk, dude. I guess I must like the sky and the ocean a lot more than you.

>>10947921
That's fine and dandy my dude. I just don't think that fiction readers will be particularly inspired by something as vague as "the sky and the ocean". I just want to help you so that you'll pay your student loans Tooker. I know that if you become rich the first thing you'll do is be a responsible man and pay your loans. Right?

>>10947916
CONFESS

>>10947920
No, I just want to help Tooker. I honestly feel very badly for him. Tooker is like the perfect example of a victim of modern feminism. Tooker was actually, unironically, a brilliant academic well on his way to success, and then two girls falsely accused him of sexual harassment and the man got thrown on the streets. Ever since then his mental state just deteriorates.

/sci/ is a Tooker support board now.

>>10947937
I confess Tooker, I did you wrong in the past. But I repent.

>>10947926
If I sold 1M copies, then I would get about $2.4M after taxes. Would I use ~7% of that to pay off my loans? Before I pay those loans off, let's see if the government is going to pay the social security check they promised me before I decided to get the loans. I'm pretty sure the government's plan is to fuck me out of the money it owes me for paying into the SS fund.

>>10947942
>But I repent.
Does your repentance include contrition? Or is just you feeling bad for yourself?

What wrong did you do me? Why did you do it?

>>10947951
That's not cool Tooker. Even if the government doesn't pay you, you have to pay your debt. Come on man, don't you want the feeling of satisfaction that comes after knowing that you paid your creditors?

>>10947959
I feel remorseful and penitent, hence why I help you now.

>What wrong did you do me? Why did you do it?

I mocked you and insulted you back in the way way back threads. I shouldn't have. You are actually a victim of the system. You are right, the government did fuck you over. Feminism was a mistake, and you are just one more victim. I hope you recover. But never forget this pain, Tooker. Remember, you can always just buy a gun and go Elliot Rodger on the gender that hurt you.

>be some guy on the internet
>think Tooker would get more satisfied by giving the USA feds $200k than by giving them the finger

>>10947972
The government isn't your creditor, Tooker. Or is it? No man, there's no way. Who lend you the money?

>>10947968
>You are actually a victim of the system.
You've got that backwards. It only looks that way now because I baited them with my own life.

>>10947986
Yes, Tooker. I know, I know. I just want you to remember deep in your heart that it was women who did this to you. And that bullets can fix any problem.

>>10947976
When I say "the government," I include NGOs like the TBTF banks which are the actual entities which bought the debt I was selling in college.

>>10947999
Banks are not the government, Tooker. We are above the government. And we don't hate you like they do. That's why we funded you. We believed in you, and we still do. Will you pay us back? I'm sure a creditor who managed to pay 200k could easily come to us for a bigger loan. How much do you think you need to carry out your plans? 1M? 50M? 100M? That's pocket change for us. I'm sure we wouldn't mind handing you the means to your ends, Tooker. That's why we are here.

>>10947991
Before I could blame women for my problems, I would have to first concede that women, as a generalized stereotype, have some autonomous initiative by which they could collectively act against me. I concede no such thing. My opinion is that women will do whatever men will let them get away with, and whatever ment hey find attractive tell them to do. Saying, "It was the women! The women are the culprits!," would be about the most femist thing I could say, but let me assure you: I am no femist!

>>10948015
>How much do you think you need to carry out your plans?
Seems like you think I've forgiven you without you ever asking me to forgive you for anything.

>>10948027
Tooker, we never did anything bad to you. In fact, we funded you. And then the government decided to mess with you, our precious credit subject, and now you are unable to pay us back. How do you think I feel? I feel angry, Tooker. We are on your side, We just want our 200k back.

>>10948032
I just want the breath of life back from the carcasses of your children though.

>>10948035
Oy vey. We have changed our mind. You can keep your 200k, we'll take even more from you now, just not in US dollars.

>>10948043
ok, you can keep that I debt I sold you too.

>>10948049
Good. I've called Bezos, it's all settled. Any profits from your book sales will be sent to our accounts. Pleasure doing business with you, Mr. Tooker.

>>10948056
>Pleasure doing business with you
wrong again

>>10948067
What are you doing? Go back to selling your book, I have bills to pay.

>>10945373
you, uhh, sure about that, bud?

>>10948218
He has schizophrenia. For all we know he sees a beautiful mane in the mirror.

In this photo, I see a man who may have been balding several years but ago, but is no longer doing so. Do you think some mental illness is affecting my understanding of the present continuous tense?
>point of order!
>hear ye! hear ye!

>>10949063
I guess you're right, Tooker. You can't be balding if you're already bald

>>10949239
>I guess you're right, Tooker.
It escapes me how this is not you all's default assumption by now.