/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10937461
This is nothing compared to our population in 2500

There is no hope.
The economy is set up so that we must keep producing and consuming lest it all crashes.

>>10937461
Europe and America are self balance, Only Africa and Asia grow insane, means billons will dead in Africa and Asia.

>>10937489
Cope. You’re just jealous you can’t compete with us in thirty years, I’ll be enjoying from the backseat

Accelerate it.

>>10937489
>Only Africa and Asia grow insane
those fuckers need to stop breeding. period.
why is it so hard to not pop out babies every 9 months?
they cant afford to feed them, or cloth them, or house them, or properly care for or provide for them.
and every new child is just another burden on the entire system so there only cucking themselves by overburdening their already limited and over tapped resources

don't get me wrong , sometimes i love kids. but africa, in particular, needs to be sterilized

>>10937513
Stop trying to pull everyone down with you

>>10937461
that chart is fuckign scary. what a nightmare

>>10937461
>2050
>long run
our path is alredy locked down and at the end lays complete collapse of our civilization and severe destruction of earths ecosystem
basically what >>10937468 says

>>10937516
are you literally retarded?

ayyy ppl gon' fuck like rabbits and there isn't anything that could be done

t. celibate

>>10937523
If some people fuck and the fucking is heritable how can you fucking stop the fucking?

>>10937547
what is Birth Control?
Contraception

but people are dirty and dumb, so this is why africa needs sterilized

>>10937554
Birth controll has been available since Mesopotamia. Still most of human history has had a population living in a malthusian trap.

>>10937554
simple, condom

>>10937870
>condoms

EXCEPT THE PROBLEM AFRICANS DON'T SEEM TO USE THEM

SEX TO THEM IS BASICALLY RAPE AND SPREADING AIDS WITHOUT A THOUGHT OR CONCERN FOR ANYTHING

>>10937461
All you need to do is wait until the Germans snap. Once they do, Europe will build a wall and all the Africans will start drowning in the seas. Question is: Will it happen in time?

>>10937513
Coz it feels good to fuck in the front hole

>>10937489
Weihan is that you buddy?

>>10937554
>Grrr Africa is not allowed to grow their population even though Europe and America and Asia do because reasons

Retarded racist

>>10937461
Not these threads again. The fertility rate in every single part of the world is dropping as countries become developed, and the UN predicts it is very possible humanity will never reach a population of 10 billion (which I think is kind of sad to think about). If anything it is a dying planet

Why is the change on the Y axis caused by 200 million deaths due to Black Death smaller than the value of the population size of 190 million in "the year 0"?

>>10939573
Africa is not allowed to grow because they are growing their population into a way larger total than Europe and America, and because they are stupid on average (IQ 70-80).

>>10939592
Latest 2019 UN population projection shows 11 billion by 2100

>>10939592
Yup. Africans will stop overbreeding ANY DAY NOW.

>>10939592
>This lie brought to you by your friendly neighborhood development/banking corporation - living an opulent, decadent lifestyle, powered by Earth destroying construction activities and population growth since the industrial revolution.

>UN finally steps the fuck up
>forming babby is no longer allowed until there has been a background check
>how is the couple's economy, education, job situation, genetics, etc
>if illegal babby is formed the government will take it away and raise it
>will serve its country until army duty is over by age of 20
>people with high IQ, athletes and people with top tier genetics will get a free pass
>rich people can buy a pass as well

>>10940666
that'll never happen.
The UN represents the interests of those that profit off consumerism and population growth. They don't care if the consumers are literally retarded, as long as they can eat, shit, and drive a lambo

>>10937509
LE EPIC COPE MAYMAYX DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

>>10940683
LE EPIC LE MAYMAY XDDD MAYMAY XDDD

>>10937461
>in the year 0
L0Lno fgt pls

>>10940666
>>rich people can buy a pass as well
Satan, pls.

>>10937518
Uh, it's literally flat near 0 for most of the graph because OP didn't normalize the scaling.

>>10937461
>growth
>linear scale

>>10937461
More humans means we can pave more roads and cover more things in chrome. What year will we have an entire planet covered in chrome? I need to know for... reasons.

>>10937513
They're in a stage where more babies = more income due to multiple economic factors. Eventually their economy will stabilize at some population number and slow down a lot.

>>10940568
Africa is supposed to replace you and your race

>>10940572
They have lower estimates than that as well but all of them range in the 9 to 11 billions. Groups like IIASA also predict stalling in as early as 2060 at somewhere around 9 billions

>>10940612
The annual population growth is decreasing and eventually even Africa will peak. Also, consider that the UN doesn't factor in advacements in education and urbanisation into its predictions, which is probably why they failed to predict extreme plunges in fertility rates in countries like Iran and Bangladesh where they went from a rate of 8 to sub replacement level in just 20 years. So yes, they will

>>10940644
t. same IQ as an african. lmao @ your life seriously

>>10942673
Bangladesh is below replacement?

>>10942673
>estimates and projections
Can we get some estimates and projections from the past so we can put it in the context of them never being right before we go on and rely on these estimates and projections?

>>10942673
>>10942687
Daily reminder that they were talking about a population growth decline in the 80's and there should be only 6 billion people today according to those projections.

>>10942687
The more revised they are, the more accurate they are

>>10942696
You mean the closer they are in time scale the more "accurate" they are because there's less time differential for them to be offset? Move up 50 years and those "accurate predictions" might as well be as inaccurate as the 1980's one.

thanks for playing though

>>10942700
Except that’s wrong because have machine learning models

>>10942701
This is some seriously bigbrain response.