[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 152 KB, 555x394, F14276F4-80D7-4BB1-97B5-C07A21BDAB15.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10934206 No.10934206 [Reply] [Original]

Theoretically, is there a point that the Universe revolves around?

>> No.10934218

>>10934206
Uranus.

>> No.10934221

>>10934218
HA

GOT IEM

>> No.10934227
File: 1.27 MB, 360x254, tenor.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10934227

>>10934218

>> No.10934229

>>10934206
No, but look into dark flow, there is a point beyond the observable universe that everything in the universe seems to be moving toward.

>> No.10934247

>>10934206
You could say that the universe rotates around the fastest spinning object within the universe, because spinning the universe around an object is the same as spinning an object within the universe.

>> No.10934252

>>10934206
>Theoretically, is there a point that the Universe revolves around?
gradients
the entire universe is like a flat surface and then mass makes depressions which are gravity and more mass comes to fill those depressions making them deeper
so if there's a giant piece of mass making a big ass depression everything will eventually go towards it and big crunch

>> No.10934256

>>10934252
Lmao, what is this, the fucking 80’s?

You still believe in the Big Crunch?

>> No.10934289

>>10934247
Based and universal reference frame pilled

>> No.10934295

>>10934229
The universe is expanding in all directions tho?

>> No.10934308

>>10934206
I don't think the universe is revolving. Why would it? What would set that in motion?

Tho it makes sense the location of the big bang is where it's all centered and growing from. Tho it's stretching at different speeds in different directions, so I'm not sure how one could measure accurately an imaginary focal point to base a universal coordinate system off of.

>> No.10934344

>>10934295
Great Attractor nigga

>> No.10934358

>>10934344
A fairy tale? That is the best you got?

>> No.10934360

>>10934206
There is, but it is a point in time rather than in space.

>> No.10934380

>>10934360
So what is it’s spacial coordinates?

>> No.10934689

>>10934380
0,0,0,0

>> No.10934694

>>10934256
Big Crunch is real. I'll be validated for continuing my support of the theory once a bigger telescope is built.

>> No.10935417

>>10934689
Fascinating

>> No.10935435

>>10934206
Even if you're a true believer in religion it doesn't have a purpose.

>> No.10935441

>>10934206
the point is in 4d space.
think about a 2d universe taking place on a sphere, and the sphere is spinning. the center of rotation is in the 3d center.
for our uinverse, its in the 4d center.

>> No.10935639
File: 1.08 MB, 864x368, 1549055794978.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10935639

>>10934694
>Big Crunch is real

>> No.10936306

>>10935639
It is

>> No.10936310
File: 38 KB, 600x315, 1563803099760.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10936310

>>10936306

>> No.10936313

>>10934206
It´s not impossible. If matter started in one point condensed in singularity and momentum was conserved...

>> No.10936683
File: 129 KB, 1000x432, smug retarder.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10936683

>>10936310
>>10935639
>it cant be real, bill nye said so

>> No.10936873

>>10934694
Wow, so the power of your argument lies in the future. History will prove you right. Powerful...

>>10934206
The heaviest object in the universe

>> No.10936874

>>10936683
It can’t be “real” because the universe’s expansion is accelerating, and not being slowed down.

>> No.10936903

No, law of conservation of angular momentum. Even if you believe it was initially revolving, the accelerating expansion would quickly nullify the revolution by the law. Also if it is revolving, it could be detectable, and hasnt been observed.