/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10931709
No

>>10931709
This is a place for science and math, not ethical questions. Ask a place that isn't filled with autistic psychopaths.

>>10931709
Offspring from interracial pairings are more likely to have mental illnesses
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29855805

Interracial marriages are less likely to be stable marriages
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4183451/

Bone marrow issues with mixed raced individuals
https://www.calhealthreport.org/2017/11/30/mixed-race-bone-marrow-donors-short-supply/

But whether or not that makes it "wrong" is subjective.

>>10931740
>>10931728
aren't latinos and south asians racemixed?.do they have higher cases of mental illness.

>>10931709
That’s an ethics question and as such irrelevant to science, so go away.

>>10931747
its relevant to biology.Just because you don't like talking about this subject doesn't make it irrelevant.

>>10931751
>its relevant to biology.

It is indeed a question relevant to biology but the question is whether or not something is “wrong”.
That’s an ethics/morality question, and as such, it is irrelevant to science. Go to the philosophy board.

Yeah, lets just let the government tell us what to do

>>10931757
>Let’s roll civil rights back by forty years xD

>>10931756
its both so better to ask it here.

>>10931759
>Better to ask an unscientific question on the science board

Is killing random people wrong? How do you go about performing experiments to prove whether or not killing random people is wrong? How do we use scientific methodology in general to discern “moral truths”?
How do we use science to determine which flavor of hot wings is the best?

YOU DONT.
ITS NOT A SCIENCE QUESTION

>>10931728
I like when people post statistics and evaluate them at face value. What you're doing here is spitting in the face of reality by posting this dogshit and implying that the world we live in isn't ridiculously sophisticated and can't just be represented by a bar graph.
There are a lot of reasons why race-mixed people would be predisposed to mental illness.
If you participate in and understand that racism exists, you should understand why someone who is a mix of two very segregated groups would have mental problems. If the two groups can barely get along in the first place, what makes you think either would take in someone who is race mixed? They're more likely to be ostracised by both.

>>10931740
>>Offspring from interracial pairings are more likely to have mental illnesses
>“Multiracial patients with rare blood diseases have an even harder time finding a bone marrow match,” Asklipiadis said, “and for matches to be successful, it’s important for donors and patients to share the same ethnic background.”

I don't know if you implied it on purpose since the first article you linked makes it seem like it's a genetic thing that exists only in a vacuum, but 5 paragraphs in and it already tells you why you're wrong. IF that's what you were trying to say. This is why you don't save articles you don't read from other people you want to believe are right.

Now if you're trying to say it's bad to have mixed race children because there aren't enough donors, then sure. But even then the things that cause for a bone marrow transplant are too rare to make it something to worry about.
>>Interracial marriages are less likely to be stable marriages
>After controlling for couple characteristics, the risk of divorce or separation among interracial couples was similar to the more-divorce-prone origin group.
Also
>Existing work tends to be dated and focused primarily on Black-White marriages.
You could make an argument against black and white but that's all and even ogsjgfds

>>10931766
I asked if racemixing is wrong?.if scientific research shows negative effects of it then indeed it is.I would have asked if smoking during pregnancy is wrong and you wouldn't be here acting like this.

>>10931709
yes, because it doesn't matter.
all the "pure" races you know of are themselves the result of racemixing.
idiots who think "races" should be preserved have ARBITRARILY determined that the current races are the ones worthy of preserving.
race-mixing is not like mixing paint, recessive traits thought to have been destroyed can reemerge in later offspring

>>10931740
mixed-"race" children are only more likely to have social issues because of the ignorance of other people, not because of any intrinsic issues with "race"-mixing

>>10931778
>I asked if racemixing is wrong?

Science doesn’t answer ethical questions, dumbass.

>if scientific research shows negative effects of it then indeed it is.

Non sequitur.

>I would have asked if smoking during pregnancy is wrong and you wouldn't be here acting like this.

Unverifiable assertion.

>>10931785
go away if you don't like this thread dumbass.No one is forcing you to be here.

>>10931784
those girls are still very closely related to each other the groups europeans are mixed of are all caucasian.

>>10931790
groups*

>>10931787
Okay you guys have fun in the off-topic race baiting thread

>>10931812
>off-topic
its really not

>>10931709
If they can mix then they are the same species.

>>10931709
preferably not at all or to a minimal amount to retain distinct genetic diversity
>>10931871
That's blatantly false as can be observed with tens of thousands of hybrids between different plant species
>>10931758
Rights are a meme

>another IQ thread

>>10931709
It's probably disadvantageous in the first generation for individuals who have adapted to radically different environments, but I think it tends to normalize thereafter.

>>10931742
We are not racemixed like those fucking Latinos. In India we have our own ancient races and we stick to them. The caste system is actually a racial hierarchy system.

>>10931793
>>10931790
Who cares. They’re still different races.

>>10932006
You are australoid+steppe+Iran neolithic,how are you not racemixed?

>>10932010
No,same race different subgroup.