/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10918250
Remove social science studies and then tell me how bad it is

>>10918269
would need to remove most biomed studies especially cancer research, cell bio, economics, ai/machine learning, psyche, and neuroscience studies before it looks respectable desu

>>10918250
hypocrite that you are, for you trust the paper telling you that papers are mostly false

>>10918250
I never understood this, when they say most does that include psychology studies? Cause it may be that there are a few fields who are outliers that fuck up the statistics

>>10918250
This is probably a strict subset of the claim that most claims are false.

>>10918323
Unironically this.

That paper is probably false as well. This is the liar's paradox all over again.

>>10918250
Climate is primarily an observational field more akin to astronomy. There are no "experiments" per se, but analysis of the empirical facts which can be independently corroborated by other teams. Even if no analysis were done, basic facts like rising CO2 emissions and green house effect from such a molecule remains an undeniable observation.

Take your cherry picking, denialist agenda garbage and stick it back to >>>/pol/.

Social sciences and chinks/poos. Stick to hard sciences published by whites and jews.

>>10920964
And just like astronomy, literally every new observation proves all existing models wrong.

>>10920964
Empirical, plus physics-driven models that let you explore mechanistic explanations rather than just going "ah well, it is what it is", which you have to rely on with social studies and medicine. In cliname, you can at least take the model, run it again with whatever perturbation you think is going to explain whatever you observed .. and you get a positive or negative result, usually including some estimate on the uncertainty.

>>10918250
>climate science
This is a misnomer, since climate "scientists" do not use the scientific method.

>>10918250
Dumb ass look at Venus.

Green house effect, Carbon Dioxide.

More carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, hotter planet.

It’s elementary ass shit you agitprop.

>>10921577
stuff is centuries old

>>10918269
Still really bad, just check Retraction Watch. They had to implement a database to keep track of the retractions.

>>10918250
Modern climate models achieve pretty close predictions to observation.

>>10921636
Chinese Burglar Fallacy here.

>>10921641
>Parameterize with 100 years of data
>Get 1 year of accuracy before flying off the rails

>>10921972
>years are expended and no longer exist

Come on anon. We can recalculate after things stop panning out.

>>10921580
Literally last century, and already showing effects. And they said "in a few centuries".

>>10922546
They were only thinking of coal, too. Hydrocarbons hadn’t entered such widescale use then.