/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10899526
No, because there doesn't exist a homeomorphism from S2 to the plane.

You'll probably have to rewrite all physics for that

>>10899529
There is without a point, that's why you can make maps

>>10899526
No, because the Flat Earth Model is a prescriptive model rather than a descriptive one. FE takes any observation and tries to fit it into the notion that the Earth is flat. This even includes observations that falsify FE. This means that FE can't make any predictions of observable phenomena, because the observations which it bases it's prediction have been warped in one way or another. Here's a list of stuff that falsify FE.

>South Celestial pole don't real
>Sunsets and sunrises don't real
>Timezones don't real
>Ships sailing out disappearing bottom first don't real
> Eddystone Lighthouse don't real
>Australia don't real
>Eratosthenes don't real
>Hurricanes don't real
>Kelper Orbital Mechanics don't real
>Gravity don't real
>Earthquakes don't real
>Cosmic Microwave Background don't real
>Moon Landings don't real
>Maritime Navigation don't real
>Space don't real
>Alfred Russel Wallace don't real
>The Sun's near constant angular diameter don't real
>Gyroscopes don't real
>Euclidean geometery don't real
>Airlines don't real
>Perspective don't real
>Moon phases don't real
>Eclipses don't real
>Cartography don't real
>Galileo don't real
>Private space companies don't real
>Japan don't real
>Plate tectonics don't real
>Satellite TV don't real
>GPS don't real
>Soviet Union don't real
>Earth's magnetic field don't real
>Stellar parallax don't real
>Cassini don't real

>>10899540
>Cartography don't real
Maps are flat. Even globes are just printed on flat material. Glad we know which side you're on.

>>10899606
>what are map projections

>>10899610
They can't exist: >>10899529
Take your flat earth peddling bullshit elsewhere.

the sun, moon and polaris are one structure.
a hybrid atomic/planetary type system, where polaris is the nucleus and the sun and moon orbit it in a closed wave pattern (with the sun sweeping in and out like the wavelength of a particle, the solstices being the peaks and valleys of the wavelength).

>>10899526
no

>>10899526
No, obviously. You must invoke literal magic.

>>10899702
The outer universe is one where simulation technology has been invented, but because the surface is infinite in all directions, the maximum extent of a simulation is a sphere. Somewhere on Earth is a patch of flat land that corresponds to the real world.

>>10899526
sort of, but it's not definable as "flat".

>>10899715
lol you reposted my berzerkfag image. i thought it was proof he was a schizo... but maybe if newager ken wheeler youtube anons want to latch ken onto flat earth, i wouldn’t object

>>10899721
>but maybe if newager ken wheeler youtube anons want to latch ken onto flat earth,

>>10899715
>sort of, but it's not definable as "flat".

Thanks for the free advertising though.

>>10899526

>>10899723
berzerkfag, are you literally a flat earther? just wondering

>>10899728
>>10899723

>sort of, but it's not definable as "flat".

Why does nobody on this board knows how to read?

>>10899729
ohhh okay the ken wheeler model of earth is flat. eratosthenes BTFO!!!!

>>10899731
>ohhh okay the ken wheeler model of earth is flat.

Ken wheeler never modeled the earth you retard. He also said he wanted nothing to do with the flat earthers. You're like the resident barneyfag of this board only you can't identify the ponyfags.

>>10899735
oh okay so the berzerk model transcends ken’s teachings? wow! you must be ultra high IQ just like ken!

tell me the details of your flat earth model

>>10899754
>"Die you fucking barneyfag"

Also it's called the "Poincare disk model" and it has nothing to do with being flat.

>>10899768
>it’s called muh hurr-durr ancient model which doesn’t actually work for real physics

>>10899772
Just show me a straight line, then there will be an end to the horror.

>>10899785
>show me a perfectly straight line
>if you cant then HAHAHAHA PHYSICS DEBUNKED
>PERFECT THINGS NOT EXISTING IN REALITY DEBUNKS PHYSICS KEK ROFL HAHAHA

>>10899810

>>10899526
Many charlatans have tried, but none have succeeded. Granted, these folks aren't the brightest minds in the world. Still, you'd expect *something* that could be explained only in the flat world, but there is absolutely nothing. Not one thing. Worse, there are no (reasonable) explanations for why anything happens: *why* do the Sun and Moon go around in tighter and wider circles over the year? Why do we see mountain tops in the east remain lighted by sunlight even though we along the coast have seen the Sun set. Etc.
It's shysters and trolls all the way down.

>>10899535

But it does not correlate with reality.

>>10899810
This is the zenith of christcuck logic

>>10899526
Is it possible to leave alone this 500 year old outdated flat Earth theroy?

the firmament is the only logical theory of the earth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firmament

>>10899526
Sure, just take earth's flatness as an axiom and rework everything from that.

>>10899526
Nobody's done it yet. Enough people have tried that I think we can move on now.

>>10900502
The problem is that, so far, every model anybody has come up with is contradicted by observations. If the model is adjusted to allow for a particular observation, then the new model contradicts a new set of obsrvations.

If you disagree with that, share your model with us please.

>>10899540
Who the fuck is Kelper?