[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 3.17 MB, 4128x3096, 1565580503218.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10881603 No.10881603[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Can you do HS level moroccan math ?

>> No.10881609
File: 102 KB, 601x508, 1512341657414.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10881609

>>10881603
>multiple choice
I don't even need to speak subhuman to know that's a joke.

>> No.10881624

>>10881609
Canadian style, wrong answers subtract points

>> No.10881627
File: 19 KB, 300x250, 381.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10881627

>>10881609
>français
>subhuman
>implying

>> No.10881632

>no one can do it

>> No.10881634

>>10881624
Immediately reveals an education system to be about briefly memorising something from a textbook, using it in an exam, and then forgetting it.

>>10881632
Do your own homework.

>> No.10881637

>>10881634
Nah we were never given a limit with a pigma before this
>homework
,This is summer vacation

>> No.10881787 [DELETED] 

An infinite product either converge towards 1, either diverge. So the answer is either a) or b).

We compose the expression by log to get a sum. We now study sum of log(1+delta^(2^k)). When k->+inf, this term is equivalent to delta^(2^k).

Sum of delta^(2^k) converges when n->+inf (geometric sum). Thus, by theorem of comparison, sum of log(1+delta^(2^k)) converges.

Thus, the product converges and converges towards 1. So answer A).

>> No.10881800
File: 2.34 MB, 2348x2561, IMG_20190812_084756.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10881800

It's C), imho.

I couldn't have done it in high school tho, because I'd have no easy way to know if this diverges or converges. You'd have to guess.

>> No.10881838

>>10881603
i'd guess c

>> No.10881852

>>10881637
>pigma
Is that how frog-speaking niggers call the upper-case Greek pi?

>> No.10881855

>>10881637
what is pigma?

>> No.10881919

>>10881603
We're not doing your homework

Sir t9owed a zebi

>> No.10881940

>>10881603

I don't speak froggy Italian

>> No.10881941

>>10881855
Google it

>> No.10882000

>>10881800
>using logarithms
Brainlet, multiply the product by 1 - delta.

>> No.10882012

>>10881855
Pigma balls lmaoo

>> No.10882025
File: 98 KB, 790x960, scandigirl08122.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10882025

>>10881603


what

highschool?

>> No.10882040
File: 61 KB, 812x1024, brainlet-circuits.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10882040

>>10881800

>product greater than 1, so not infinity


it's actually infinity.

hear that morocco guy?
now you can go back to beheading scandinavian tourists.

>> No.10882041
File: 655 KB, 2703x1850, 20190812_122730-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10882041

>>10882000 is right

>> No.10882043

>>10882041

>> No.10882045
File: 640 KB, 2896x1727, 20190812_122932-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10882045

>>10882041
Better pic

>> No.10882051

I don't even know what lim or this house-shaped symbol means
t. european computer scientsist

>> No.10882052

>>10882051
based!

>> No.10882056

>>10882041
I'm always ultimate brainlet when it comes to these. Like how the fuck can the products of all of 1+x^2^n as n trends towards infinity be summarized as a finite quantity seemingly smaller than the one we started with?? I 'understand' the mathematical proof but the logic is lost in me

>> No.10882057

>>10881603

Expecting kids in HS to understand this without memorization is retarded lmao