/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10859987
You have to be 18 to post here.

Is pure counciousness made out atoms?

>>10859987
Your consciousness is liquid.

>>10859987
What is the critical point of Pure Consciousness? Im trying to get my graphite pencil to transition to Pure Consciousness. What pressure did you use, OP?

>>10859987
>you will judge me
...as being an amateur, unoriginal philosophag

>>10859987
fucking retard. i bet youre that nigger that thinks breathing and rotation are spatial dimensions

>>10859987
Philosophy, not even once.

>>10859987
What about love? Love can move mountains. None of us exist without love.

Why isn't love a state of matter. Or at least its own chemical element?

>>10859987
ill judge you because you are a retard
consciousness

>>10859987
Pure consciousness = plasma?

>>10861544
>implying the qualia of love isn't a form of consciousness

>>10860559
No

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXX-_G_9kww
http://cogprints.org/6613/1/Dualism0409.pdf

>>10861613
>qualia

Now I know you're trolling. Pro scientist masquerading as /phil/fag

Well done

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBbFuudKAic

>>10861619
t. P-zombie

>>10861599
i guess

>it makes sense to me so it's correct
OP is a guaranteed christcuck

>>10861619
Fuck off bro, anybody who at this point hasn't realised that the hard problem isn't a silver bullet for materialism is flat out fucking delusional. Pretty much every other ontology has a valid response to the hard problem, materialism is the only one with zero explanatory power whatsoever concerning it. It's epistemically crippled and any neuroscientist, physicist and philosopher that's busy fucking around with the brain hoping a magical categorical shift in properties will take place is actively wasting money.

>>10861683
The hard problem IS a silver bullet for materialism

Neuralink will revolutionize our understanding of consciousness. Through the ability to merge consciousnesses, the fundamental nature of consciousness will be revealed the only way it can be--by truly seeing what it is LIKE to be a fundamental property of the universe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USKzAj1dOq4

In this analysis of Evangelion, and in particular, of "Instrumentality" (merger of consciousnesses) as it is called in the show, an interesting dialogue between Shinji and is mental interlocutors lays bare what will be probably the biggest obstacle to achieving instrumentality: the realization that when "you" are everyone, you are all alone in the entire universe. In this, Evangelion is an anti-instrumentality show. Meanwhile, I would like to make a pro-instrumentality case by countering that when you (we) become the overconsciousness, we will no longer have human social needs, because we will no longer be human. Plenty of animals are independent and have minimal social needs. We are simply being blinded by a simple biological drive that won't have any place in a world where consciousness is unified.

>>10861719
Lmao shut the fuck up.

>>10861672
>>10861683
>god
>materialism
>>10861719
I'm >>10861719
not either one of those, never have been. Always have been a materialist atheist. Only recently have I become an agnostic on both. I.e. I think they are too difficult for me to say anything them (in the case of god, that's impossible to know for anyone) so I just don't talk about it anymore. Instead I approach the problem from reverse, by trying to talk about what I think I CAN talk about from all the various experimental and observational evidence that has cropped up over the years of my thinking about it. That's where this >>10861719 statement comes from. Not from Christfuckery, not from idealism, just what SEEMS to be true. It's a very modest statement, by the way. There is so very little we can say for sure about any of this still.

>>10859987
no you retard, the intellect is immaterial

>>10859987
This post makes me want to beat your consciousness with a solid until your liquids are completely exposed to gasses.
:D