/sci/ - Science & Math

127.0.0.1

8

1

1.61

>>1083562
If you're referring to Avogadro's number, it's 6.0221415*10^23
here's a constant:
φ(phi)=(1+5^(1/2))/2≈1.618033

Motherfucking Manning's n value

>>1083600

>x10^27
Amount of atoms in ten thousand mols?

pi + e, which by the way might be rational.

h

192.168.1.1

283.695

>>1083598
one of my favorites!

anyone for this one?
9.64853 x 10^4

e-8

255.255.255.0

>>1083610
6.0221415*10^23 ~ 6.022^27

2/3

>>1083667
The fuck?

ln(8)+log(8)+8

sin(root(ln(root(ln(8)))))

x for some constant x

lim (n to inf) (1+1/n)^n

9000

0.999...9

a

3 tsp = 1 tbsp
2 tbsp = 1 oz
8 oz = 1 cup
2 cups = 1 pint
2 pints = 1 quart
4 quart = 1 gallon
1 ft^3 = 7.48 gallons
3.8 litres = 1 gallon

0.0072973525376

>>1083702
Can an equation be a constant?

... I guess.

8

...999, which most idiots write as -1.

>>1083733
wut

35 quintillion arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow arrow googolplex

>>1083631
Why on earth would that be rational?

>>1083742
...999 + 1 = ...000
...999 + 1 = 0
...999 = -1

>>1083745
It's probably not, but no one can prove it.

>>1083745
If pi is a Hurwitz number, then e+pi and e*pi are definitely irrational. But this is not known.

graham's number. it'd take the every being on the planet (insects etc) the entire age of the universe reciting a number once every planck time just to get through the first time. i just made all that shit up but i bet it's probably not far from the truth.

>>1083767
Excuse my ignorance, but what's a Hurwitz number?

>>1083812
A number with a continued fraction whose terms are the values of one or more polynomials evaluated on consecutive integers and then interleaved. This property is preserved by Möbius transformations (Gosper 1972, p. 44).

>>1083848
Alright, thanks.

8

>>1083862
A continued fraction could be written
<span class="math">a + \frac{b}{c + \frac{d}{e + \cdots}}[/spoiler]
but if all the numerators are 1, then you just write something like
[1; 2 2] = <span class="math">1 + frac{1}{2 + \frac{1}{2}}[/spoiler] = 7/5
e has a very simple pattern
[; 1 2n 1 ...], n=0 to <span class="math">\infty[/spoiler]
pi is not known to have a pattern in its regular continued fraction (numerators are 1). If one is found like this, then e*pi, e+pi, e/pi, etc, are all irrational.

>>1083756
wut

8

>>1083902
wrong, the answer is 42.

8

8

1.6 x 10^-19
6.25 x 10^18

euler-mascheroni constant

OP here, i really wasn't expecting that this thread would go that far, thanks /sci/

8

>>1084257

sheeeeeeeeit

π
haters gonna hate

>>1084257


i lold

2

C

K=9x10^9

9.0x10^9

>>1083756

What the fuck am I reading?

>>1084257

Desmond is king of /sci/

>>1084325
Genius. Genius is what you're reading.

>>1084325
9 + 1 = 10, 99 + 1 = 100, 999 + 1 = 1000, etc. But if the number of 9's is infinite, and you add 1, you don't get a 1 anywhere in the sum -- it's just ...000, or 0. So ...999 must equal -1.

5776

>>1083733
Didn't expect to see 10-adic numbers on 4chan ever. Prime bases work better, though.

>>1084493
But props to you for awesomeness.

>>1084664
Where are you, Mr. 10-adic?

1amu = 1,661x10^-24g

Death; taxes.

4

>>1083672
I believe that is 6 log(2) + 8