[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 484 KB, 1400x788, future-scenarios.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10787233 No.10787233 [Reply] [Original]

Is hypercomputation possible?

>> No.10787237

>>10787233
what in the actual fuck is that curve supposed to represent?

>> No.10787241

>>10787237
I don't know, I couldn't find a decent image for hypercomputation. So I found this one on Google image search, and it had a lot of buzzwords

>> No.10787242

>>10787237
It's 'transhumanist' pornography. Don't overthink it.

>> No.10787268

anyone?

>> No.10787278
File: 45 KB, 640x427, IMG_6740.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10787278

>>10787268
cats
bxoes

>> No.10787280

>>10787237
A curve

>> No.10787286

>>10787233
Yeah, gods.

>> No.10787288

>>10787233
>>10787268
80 years ago
>turing defines his machines in such a way that it can carry out any algorithm that a human or a machine can do
>proves that some things simply cannot be algorytmically computed
some time later
>some mathematicians/theoretical comp scientists run out of things to do
>oh let's suppose that we have an oracle which can say whether a given TM stops on a given input
>well fuck this has nothing to do with reality
>but we can write a few interesting consequences so let's put this into paper
today
>iS hyPeRcOmPuTaTioN pOsSiBle?

>> No.10787317
File: 58 KB, 582x226, turing rapsheet.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10787317

>>10787233
>>10787288
>worshiping a pedo
Call them what they are, Post machines.

>> No.10787321

>>10787317
Read tell me on post machines!

>> No.10787328
File: 38 KB, 657x527, detective apu.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10787328

>>10787288
Turing's original paper had oracle machines in it tho

>> No.10787390

>>10787317
Murray was nineteen, and could be several years younger and it not be “pedophilia”, so why are you lying?

>> No.10788520

>>10787242
What?

>> No.10788643

>>10787237
hang height of whoever mentions the respective term unironically

>> No.10788683

>>10787390
>why are you lying?
Ad hominem won't make Turing less of a pedo