/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10703150
Never heard of it

>>10703150
>baby precalculus+matrix algebra+calculus book

>>10703150
Looks like a typical book that covers calculus I-III. I'm however not acquainted with it. I prefer russian/german math books.
>>10703967
You probably haven't advance beyond elementary calculus either

>>10704052
what russian/german books would you suggest?

>>10705129
Дeмидoвич B.П Cбopник зaдaч и yпpaжнeний пo мaтeмaтичecкoмy aнaлизy

Problems in Mathematical Analysis by Demidovich

>>10705129
Linear Algebra by Georgiy Shilow
Lehrbuch der Analysis by Harro Heuser. I'm however not aware that there is an English translation of this.

Never heard of that one. Generally the books assigned for mathematical methods for physics or engineering course are Arfken, Boas, Riley, and maybe Hassani for slightly more difficulty. It's good to have as a sort of reference when learning and I think you can also learn depending on the structure and content of the book (Riley is best for learning as opposed to just being a reference afaik); however, you should consider including pure math, or at least spend some time on the basics and proofs - if you're serious about learning maths you NEED to use topic-specific books for maths students which go into more depth and have more """rigor""". Check out the sci wikia: https://4chan-science.fandom.com/wiki/Mathematics

>>10703150
Just use Paul's Online Math Notes for Calc I thru DiffEQs. Once you get higher than that, you can find a lot of textbooks that assume the reader is self-teaching.

>>10703150

>>10706139
How new jesus christ.

>>10706183
Yet people still don't understand

>>10706139
An opinion disguised as fact. Kewl.

>>10706139
You have to be over the age of 18 to post here

>>10706099
>rigor
Meme term used to justify badly written books.

"If you can't understand my messy shitty writings it's because you lack rigor!"

>>10706392
Kek