/sci/ - Science & Math

>another IQ thread

>>10648788
>another another IQ thread post

This is the thread to end all the others , if you are not in those brackets you will not make it. I am most likely in the lower one as well.

>>10648782
Actually this post is actually relatively insightful as far as talent is concerned (not sure how well it applied to iq itself).
>Gifted people get to pursue their dreams without fear of being held back by the limits of their talent.
>Those entirely deprived of talent will likely never see near the summit, so depending on their attitude they can believe falsely in their competence and live satisfied, or be humbled by it all and pursue something more worthy of their time instead.
>Those who have a degree of talent, but not enough to succeed will be the ones trapped in the hell of their goals being nearly within reach, but never achievable. This can often manifest in dissatisfaction with either themselves or the lot theyve been thrown in life.

>>10648782
Posting on /pol/ has made me appreciate this pic.

>guy with supposedly 130+ iq can only interact with >100 iq retards
>thinks he is actually smart and has 130+

>>10648930
No, the thing is you can present a complex argument to a <100IQ and he'll say "aye", while the 120IQ will try to fight you so you have to waste your time explaining.

>>10649048
You've never tried to have a conversation about climate change with a <100IQ retard before have you?

>>10649055
Sub 100 iq is not retard

>>10649055
>people who understand climate science is too politicized to be taken seriously are assumed to be <100
thats pretty <100 of you

>>10649055
>caring about climate change
This is exactly what I mean.

>>10649059
>>10649063
>>10649065
>all this >100 IQ cope
yikes

>>10649079
I am happy to admit I am stupid , I posted this so all you guys circle jerking about your test scores can let go.

>>10648782
me on the left

>>10648782
True.

Retards and brainiacs are BROS for life.

>>10648782
120-130 iq is the worst.

Smart enough to appreciate many topics, but too slow to succeed in a lot of competitive environments.

130+ iqs will just see you as someone not as intellectually stimulating as their more successful coworkers, and >100 iqs will think you're full of it because you talk fancy but aren't a professor, CEO, or rich.

Best course of action is to accept a relatively simple life and use your brain to make better decisions to work less so you have time to read books 130iqers wrote.

>>10649215
110 here, I pretty much just do this and appreciate that geniuses have made their knowledge available to me, even if I only understand 50% of it. I work my nine to five and am happy, because the alternative sucks.

>>10649215
Why the fuck would I read boring books like that, how is it gonna help me?

>>10648845
>talent

>>10649218
Im a " high iqer". Honestly this is what I meant would hope for out of people with lower Iqs. If they are passionate about some intellectually challenging topic, sure pursue it. But also remember being too good at something is also a burden, because you are obligated to dedicate yourself to it. In a way, having a lower iq offers more freedom to live a comfy life.

>>10648782
Yeah i'm at 145 and i'm a scientist

so i'm ok with this poorly crafted piece of propaganda

>>10649282
the talent of contributing 'quality kontent' to 4chan

this is why we can't have nice things

>>10648782