/sci/ - Science & Math

>>10642921

>>10642927
f-fuck
where is this from

>>10642932
wi-cancer.info
jew shills and their 5G trannies will show up and call me or you a schizo

>>10642921
link me the paper that says it could be harmful, heard someone talking about this before and I think the most credit you can give it is "Maybe we don't know whether or not this radiation is harmful in the long run, but it probably isn't"

That being said if there is a paper or anything that explains why 5G is more harmful beyond hand waving arguments, I'd be happy to read it and have my mind changed / present to you why it's wrong.

>>10642938
i dont know if this is it but its in that appeal link
the [12] has a pdf file about non ionising stuff (that i havent read, cause i probably wouldnt understand it anyway)

that appeal has a LOT of information and citations you could probably dig through if you wanted https://www.5gspaceappeal.org/the-appeal/#fn9a

>>10642938
wi-cancer.info has literally hundreds of citations and links to scientific, peer-reviewed data that is not funded by the industry

keep in mind the industry does not fund studies that show microwaves cause damage

so how the hell can i protect against this
throw my wifi modem out? not gonna help, i have like 50 transmitters in my apartment complex, all the channels are completely packed

my phone? radio towers everywhere anyway, even if i dont use 3-4-5g its still going to be everywhere

how did it get so bad? kids were getting cancer leaving near radio towers or powerlines decades ago, why didnt we stop it?

>>10642944
>>10642942
Okay so I read some of the stuff and I get the gist of it.
(I didn't really read where they were published though)
Chickens are less likely to imprint when exposed to certain modulation frequencies etc etc

So if it really is damaging, why would it happen? I could understand if our politicians and CEOs etc were on different planet or something, but they are bathed in WiFi too.

Anything that affects people in power in a negative way is normally fought against by those people, and since those people have the means and influence to shut stuff down, they would.

So what, do I have to believe that the people in power aren't really in power and it's underground lizards or something? Or the wifi industry is all powerful?

I'm not trying to be dismissive, I'm being genuine. I won't dismiss the idea that it's harmful I'd just like to know how you answer these questions if you believe it is harmful.

>>10642952
im thinking cause people dont really know that its a problem?
and the lower end of the problem is that its going to take decades for harmful effects
but 5g is THAT much more damaging so it would be a lot more disastrous?

i think he talks in the video that a US congressman asked the 5g dudes about if they have done any research about 5g being harmless, and they said they didnt, and they only complying with FCC, and then he tried contacting FCC to ask them if THEY did any research, and they didnt reply
this is some big red flags to be honest

>>10642959
I suppose I can entertain that, same sort of thing happened with global warming I suppose, no one in 1879 was worried about all the coal burning.

But then why is there research being ignored? How does ignoring all that research not require some conspiracy against the human race?

>>10642967
cause i dont think enough people might be talking about it
and it might sound to others just enough like a flat earth conspiracy that they would just not look past that into the citations and the research

at the bottom of all this i just think that the companies will try to make money no matter the outcome and if they can get away with it they will
its not a conspiracy its just business
tobacco, alcohol, pollution, its all the same, isnt it? in the end could it all just end with putting a little sticker on the phone that says "using device may cause cancer" or something, and everything just staying the same

>>10642921
Don't be silly anon, if it weren't all sunshine and roses the government would put a stop to it!

>>10642952
the people in power get there by being unethical moronic psychopaths

https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal